(2 stars)
TLDR: This book didn’t work for me but I hope there will be others readers who enjoy it. I personally found the characters flat and this book didn’t have the discussion about performative activism I had hoped for given its blurb. It was a quick read and I liked the first quarter well enough but disliked, and was very disappointed by, the direction it went in the end.
--
I was very excited at the start of this book. The characters seemed very exaggerated in a satirical way and, based on this and the blurb of the book, I was looking forward to the critique this book would make of these characters. The blurb also gave me the impression that the critique would come from a place of compassion and focused on finding the humanity behind the caricatures that the characters felt like at the start. Unfortunately, this never happened. For example, I wanted to hear more about how Rhoda felt about having rich parents and effectively being a landlord while protesting against privilege in other people. Although we get some passive-aggressive comments between the characters about this, these ideas are never fully discussed or developed further. The blurb made it seem that all of these characters would have some sort of reckoning with each other and themselves that causes them all to be more authentic with one another, but this did not happen, in my opinion. I felt like these characters all started and ended the book almost exactly the same. I do think being able to discuss feelings and boundaries etc. with your friends in an open and honest way is very important, but every sentence these characters said felt fake, rehearsed, and taken straight from an Instagram therapy advice. And despite all this supposed “open-ness” I felt the characters were constantly lying and manipulating one another. Again, I was very on board with this at the start when I thought this book was trying to interrogate how people can feel increasingly pressured to say the correct thing to friends, but this interrogation never came.
By the end, and as the book ran out of pages to have the nuanced discussion I was hoping for, I was expecting a big fall out between the flat mates that would result in them going their separate ways and realising that their performances for each other throughout the book were harming everyone involved. I felt like all of the characters were painfully fake to one another and the book presented their relationships at the end as extremely positive?
I understand that Billy, the main character, had many abusive relationships in her past and I wished for her to find people where she could be herself, finally have opinions, and feel secure, but I definitely do not think that Rhoda and Sid are people who give her this in any way (nor do I think she could give them the kindness or friendship they deserve either! Billy is constantly thinking about how annoying Rhoda and Sid are. I don’t think these characters living together is good for any of them).
Because the blurb of this book makes the comparison with ‘Evenings and Weekends’ by Oisin McEna, I would like to compare the two briefly (for context, I really enjoyed ‘Evenings and Weekends’). I see the similarities, but where ‘Evenings and Weekends’ offers a nuanced and interesting dive into many characters which are not necessarily “likeable”, ‘Hard Place’ just took the idea of unlikeable characters to the extreme and didn’t feel at all nuanced in their portrayal.
I don’t know. Maybe I missed something here. I hope that is the case and that other people will find and enjoy this book as I am always pleased to see books with queer rep being published and read.
My thanks to NetGalley and the publisher for the eARC.