This book was not as good as the previous one I read, The Essentials of Prayer by Bounds. But it did make some good points, and there definitely were a few places that I took issue with.
The idea that we should pray today fro today's needs cannot be lost on anyone, yet it is. A main thrust of Bounds is the idea that prayer is superior in priority to most other Christian work, and, in fact, is absolutely prerequisite to most - if not all - Christian work. Habitual, diligent prayer is what he calls it.
Again, prayer is to be thoughtful, an engagement of the intellect - not a mindless, emotional ranting as is so often seen today. Not simply a mosh posh of quips and interjections as is so often the case. It is serious, somber, methodical work. Bounds says, "A lack of ardour in prayer, is the sure sign of a lack of depth and of intensity of desire; and the absences of intense desire is a sure sign of God's absence from the heart!"
I think Bounds hits the nail right on the head: "two thins are intolerable to Him [God] - insincerity and lukewarmness." We are truly the Laodicean church.
Another great quote: "Beautiful theories are marred by ugly lives."
Now, in chapter 9, it talks at length about the law and keeping the law. Apparently, Bounds is under the impression that God would not ask us to do something that was impossible for us to do - have redemption through the law. But, because we choose not to be redeemed by the law, God does so out of grace, through Christ.
I also found in this book a perfect description of me: "God is neither tyrannical or severe." Maybe God is not, but most certainly am.
In Chapter 13 we dip into an area that I find in complete accord with, sort of. Bounds asserts that praying people are bible-reading people. That God speaks to us through the bible, and we speak to God through prayer. With this I would agree. But I am a man of little prayers - both quantitatively and qualitatively.
But, in no way does prayer or bible reading cause me to visit the house of God. At least, not the house of God we have today - or, the house of gods. More amply, the houses of men. For churches are no more a divine place of worship than the grave, and they are full of wickedness within and without.
Bounds claims that, "no man loves the Bible who does not love to pray." But I contend this is not true. I love the bible. I love studying the bible. I love researching the bible and discovering what the authors were trying to say. Yet, for the most part, I remain prayer-less. I have no propensity for long oration in prayer, nor do I [and more importantly] have the desire to devote time to intercession on behalf of others. I have no love for the saints of God, and this is, to me, most disturbing. But, I will say, I do like the hope that Bounds inspires. He says, "no two things are more essential to a spirit-filled life than bible-reading and secret prayer."
This is the kind of vocation I seek to develop, to occupy my time on earth with: bible-reading/studying and secret prayer. I don't want a job in the clergy. I don't want to build a church. In fact, I don't to involve myself at all with the people of the church or the people of the world. I want to be isolated, live is solitude, and therefore, how fitting is it that my obligation would be prayer. How more fitting is it for me to be drawn to the theology of the desert fathers, to heed the woods, "Go into your cell and close the door; your cell will teach you everything." This is what I am hopeful for in my retirement, to have a 4' x 7' cell in the middle of the woods. To live a life of solitude and contemplation. To live with my stories and be creative and alive in bliss. To commune with my God. To read and study his word.
Chapter 14, I believe, is incorrect. Bounds seems to think that a church building is somehow "set apart", that it is "no common place" and is "where God meets with his people." I can't disagree more. A church building is utterly a design of man, for his purposes, and is no less secular than the warehouse or the night club. It is only by the infilling of a building by the CHURCH [the individual members that make up the body of Christ] that sets it apart, and only for the time that it is infilled. It is actually the people who are infilled, not the place, for it does not change.
Bounds makes the statement, "as God has made special promise to meet his people there, it is their duty to go there, and for that specific end." My concern here is, where in the bible does God give us a special promise to meet his people in a church building?
I do, though, agree with Bound's assessment that prayer should come before preaching in the Church, it should be the main focus of the church meeting. Unfortunately, it is the most absent portion of our expression as Christians in this day and age. We are, in this respect, a prayer-less people.