What do you think?
Rate this book
Submerged Forests
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
Hardcover
Published January 1, 1913
1 person is currently reading
42 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
July 29, 2024
We can dig up the land to see what’s beneath it. But how do we know what’s under the water? Sorry guys. It’s geology and that’s about as interesting I could make it.
I did find the concept interesting though. It’s not like core samples in the water are that easy to obtain. This was originally published in 1913 before we had the technology we now take for granted. They had to take an opportunisitic approach and gather information whenever a new dock was put in the harbour. Then they managed to see what was around 100m below the water level.
It was of great interest to geologists, archaeologists and botanists. Normally working separately, this study incorporated all three disciplines. The main question at the time was, ‘was the sea level higher back then or did the land submerge?’. The botanists looked at the vegetation layers of peat. The archaeologists the human relics within layers (swords, flint, bronze), and the geologists the layers of strata and mechanisms driving the main question.
This research took place in Great Britain and surrounds, such as the Thames valley, the east coast, Dogger Bank (what a cool name by the way), the Irish Sea, Bristol Channel, the English Channel, Cornwall and the Atlantic coast. A casual interest in river/ocean bathymetry may interest some potential readers.
The book was written by an expert at the time, and deliberately done in a non-scientific-like fashion, by making the subject matter understandable. The language was quite amusing. I imagined an expert handing in their notice and being told the replacement won’t start until after they’ve left and could they just write a brief update on what they know. Some topics were brushed over with unapologetic irrelevance clauses along the lines of, “this topic deserves a book of it’s own so you will have to read it yourself or trust what I say.” That was paraphrased. Those exclusions were so good actually. You can get mired in the unimportant and it was good of him to smash through the most relevant information. Having said that, there have no doubt been scientific breakthroughs since this was published so if the up-to-date information is what you’re looking for, then perhaps go elsewhere. Although apparently this piece of research is still regarded well.
I did find the concept interesting though. It’s not like core samples in the water are that easy to obtain. This was originally published in 1913 before we had the technology we now take for granted. They had to take an opportunisitic approach and gather information whenever a new dock was put in the harbour. Then they managed to see what was around 100m below the water level.
It was of great interest to geologists, archaeologists and botanists. Normally working separately, this study incorporated all three disciplines. The main question at the time was, ‘was the sea level higher back then or did the land submerge?’. The botanists looked at the vegetation layers of peat. The archaeologists the human relics within layers (swords, flint, bronze), and the geologists the layers of strata and mechanisms driving the main question.
This research took place in Great Britain and surrounds, such as the Thames valley, the east coast, Dogger Bank (what a cool name by the way), the Irish Sea, Bristol Channel, the English Channel, Cornwall and the Atlantic coast. A casual interest in river/ocean bathymetry may interest some potential readers.
The book was written by an expert at the time, and deliberately done in a non-scientific-like fashion, by making the subject matter understandable. The language was quite amusing. I imagined an expert handing in their notice and being told the replacement won’t start until after they’ve left and could they just write a brief update on what they know. Some topics were brushed over with unapologetic irrelevance clauses along the lines of, “this topic deserves a book of it’s own so you will have to read it yourself or trust what I say.” That was paraphrased. Those exclusions were so good actually. You can get mired in the unimportant and it was good of him to smash through the most relevant information. Having said that, there have no doubt been scientific breakthroughs since this was published so if the up-to-date information is what you’re looking for, then perhaps go elsewhere. Although apparently this piece of research is still regarded well.
Displaying 1 of 1 review