5 stars for the first two pieces alone - both incredible items of journalism. First a Gonzo-esque deep dive into the experiences of psychoactive drug use during therapy, which was fascinating and very personal. Then a more investigative piece about an inappropriate relationship between therapist and patient - how was it justified in each person's mind? how did it go on for so long?
Other pieces also interesting - all the fiction worth a read, and several interviews about psychoanalysis providing a more sober backdrop.
This edition of Granta is a mixed bag of short pieces of writing only a few of which are connected with its theme of 'Therapy', which itself is restricted to psychoanalysis, as if this were the sole modality of counselling. The two short stories which do deal with therapy appear to be satirising the poses and inventions of the analyst, as if any contrived explanation of the client's problem is effective in providing a solution. I did enjoy the very articulate transcripts of interviews with Juliet Mitchell about her project to reconcile the feminist movement with Freud, and also with Jonathan Lear about the connexions between psychoanalysis and ancient Greek philosophy (I was touched to find that, not only did we graduate in Cambridge in the same year, but he became a Fellow of my College a few years later, where he formed a friendship with the college's History tutor whom I knew - both sadly recently deceased). I found Sheila Heti's account of her experimentation with drug therapy fascinating (and was disturbed by her description of her experience of taking DMT, which I found exactly like my own hitherto unexplained terrifying nightmares as a young teenager, as if DMT, which naturally floods the body at birth and death, might also be triggered by the stresses of puberty). Dushko Cordova's article on fragrances, whilst nothing to do with therapy, even with aromatherapy, I found very interesting and informative. Robert Hass's poems, as you would expect from a former American poet laureate, were very moving. But, the biggest surprise for me was Benjamin Kunkel'sshort story, "Whatever Creek Meadows." I almost didn't read it, so repelled was I by its opening of verbal diarrhoea, and left it till last. I found his story hugely entertaining and believable, and have even realised his style of writing was both appropriate for the character of the narrator, and even a form of free-association beloved of psychoanalysts.
The highlights for me were Good Medicine, Transference in the Afternoon, Whatever Creek Meadows, and Second Hand Smoke. I also enjoyed Robert Hass' poems.
I enjoyed this volume of Granta more than the most recent volumes. Sheila Heti’s DMT and MDMA experiences seemed so carefully planned and informative. Jesse Baron’s piece about the mad transference and countr-transference that did or did not happen, but is still being settled in court is one of those stories you hear when you think you’ve heard it all. Dushko Petrovich Córdova writes on perfumes and the world of perfume connoisseurs which I don’t ever imagine existed. His writing made me want to seek out his “observations about the visuals of the second Trump administration” that is bio I the back says were recently published in “n+1”. The fiction, by Benjamin Kunkel and Anne Serre, especially, was entertaining. I loved Mosuk Nolte’s photography and was happy to read Guadalupe Nettel introduce it. Rinko Kawauchi’s photography was a beautiful study of light. I didn’t know these photographic works before. I have some familiarity with Louise Bourgeois, but her Psychoanalytic Writings add another dimension. I enjoyed the interviews, mostly therapists talking about their work.It was insightful. Finally, I loved the poetry, Natalie Shapiro, Olive Franklin, Victor Heringer, and especially, Robert Hass.
The editors introduction is what made the biggest impression on me, it describes my own view on the profession of therapy rather well. Very impressive on the editors part.
Good medicine by Sheila Heti is perhaps the most middle class, oblique and hedonistic example of bohemian navel gazing i have ever read. It has the intellectual & meaningful content of a light morning fog.
The issue strengthens my sense of curiousness as to why it is, that so many therapists, particularly the behavioural or freudian ones, have such an affinity for marxism as an ideology.
I chortled reading of an interviewee's father suffering during Mccarthyism because he "accidentally" attended a communist party meeting. I would have liked to have witnessed that.
A decent issue, its strengths being the introduction, the photography and the interviews, interspersed with some mind rotting waffle.
i found all the poetry and photography to be quite arresting in this issue. additionally, sheila heti’s opening piece of laidback and introspective new journalism was a nice start. none of the fiction particular floored me, but they all succeeded in intriguing me enough that i’d probably pick up a novel or story collection by any of their authors, one day. far too much space dedicated to psychoanalytical ramblings in this for more liking - the topic of ‘therapy’ has several more interesting sides to explore. why not an interview with a music therapist or a piece examining the relation between therapy and neurodivergence (not just mental illness), for example. anyhow, not that much of a complaint as the psychoanalysts were quite eloquent, and juliet mitchell’s interview offered an interesting angle and insight to offset the sameness of the others. looking forward to the next issue!
I've had a Granta subscription for nearly 30 years, and this latest edition rates up there with some of my favorites. The writings etc. are not all brilliant or engaging, but the prose/poetry and photography in this issues won me over as some of the best that I've seen in Granta. That combined with most of the writing being so much more engaging than I had anticipated given the theme of the issue moved the issue into the 5-star range for me. I read this in mid-Feb 2026 since that was when the issue arrived routinely in the mail. Goodreads made an error listing a later publication date apparently.
Ich fand die Ausgabe nur so mittel: Die Einleitung des Herausgebers las sich wieder, als fände er das ganze Thema doof, die Auswahl der Texte ließ erst in Gesamtschau erkennen, dass es nicht um Psychotherapie insgesamt ging, sondern um ganz klassische Freud’sche Psychoanalyse und ihren Stand heute (die ich für recht überholt und veraltet gehalten hatte). Vereinzelte Texte und eine Fotoserie drehten sich dann aber doch wieder um Gesprächstherapie im Allgemeinen.
Some of the strongest hitters are earliest on - Sheila Heti's experience with ketamine therapy was super interesting (and endearingly Canadian). Kunkel is a pleasure as always, and "Transference in the Afternoon" is just classic good magazine journalism. I don't always go in for the poetry in Granta but the Robert Hass and Victor Heiringer were both nice
Sheila Heti’s piece was so engaging, I felt like I was high at the end. Secondhand Smoke by Dushko Petrovich Córdova was also awesome … Jeremy Fragrance in Granta, who would’ve thought. Louise Bourgeois’ Psychoanalytic writings were also super compelling.
By smartly framing (and challenging) the therapeutic experience around narrative identity, this volume exploring psychological counseling becomes a fascinating exploration of storytelling in essays, interviews, photograph, and poetry.
Was excited for this til it became clear it was almost all about Freudian stuff. Could've been so much more interesting if it was tied to actual data-backed approaches. The piece on fragrance was spectacular, though!
My first Granta! Liked it a lot. Interview with Lear was great and Barron's "Transference In The Afternoon" was interesting. Overall nice mix of mediums and styles. Looking forward to the next.
Good Medicine - Sheila Heti Transference in the Afternoon - Jesse Barron Her Enemy’s Phrase - Missouri Williams Inhabiting Light - Rinko Kawauchi (photography)
As others have noted, the two initial nonfiction pieces were the most absorbing and memorable of the bunch, but even outside those two, overall the collection felt evocative and effective. It’s always interesting to see how people make sense of the different elements of the therapy practice and the space (literal and figurative) it creates, and poke fun at the many associated tropes.