I wanted to be able to rate this higher, but honestly I spent most of the book trying to figure out how it was rated as highly as it was. I get people's response, now. The end packs a punch and is powerful, but I'm left wondering if the "end justifies the means." There was a lot of meandering to get to where it got. I like what Levi was trying to do but am not convinced it was executed as effectively as it could've been, and that was disappointing because of what it truly could've been. It felt like it has a strong foundation and potential but needed another round of solid edits.
1. For being so dialogue heavy, the dialogue all sounded the same. It also missed lots of opportunities for descriptive beats, making it feel even more lackluster.
2. I think in part because of that, the characters felt somewhat flat and lacking a voice. Even Theo, who everyone seems to love so much, really didn't feel fleshed out to me. Obviously part of that is the mystery behind him, but even aside from that, it felt like many of the characters were more caricatures.
3. I really didn't get the depth of character relationships that were supposedly developed. Like Theo and Tony were supposed to have become super tight, but all we see is them chatting a few times.
4. There's also redundant dialogue and exposition. A lot of telling when showing would be sufficient. I felt like the author didn't trust me to pick up on things, but would follow up a description with an explanation, like he had to make sure I got it.
5. The POV shifting between around between seemingly limited to omniscient also threw me off a bit. And I don't love the random insert of letters.
6. For most of the story it just didn't feel like anything was at stake. It was nice enough to read the accounts and the personal interest stories, but... there wasn't any threat or concern or worry.
7. Also, Theo didn't have any flaws, other than being mysterious. Like, he's just this nice guy with nothing he's up against, so no way to grow or change.
8. The wasn't a reasonable build-up or foreshadowing for the ending. You don't need to give away your climax, but your climax shouldn't come so far out of left field that it feels like it belongs in another book.
9. Without giving a spoiler - the 3rd incident in the climax really rubs me the wrong way, and not just for the "obvious" reasons. I'm not convinced it had to happen. I don't know why it had to happen. It doesn't feel reasonable, even in its own fictional world, that it happened. In other words, it feels forced for dramatic effect, and while that dramatic effect was powerful, I almost feel like it was a cheat to get that, and that makes me feel taken advantage of as a reader.
All that said, I'd probably read Levi again if he wrote more books (i.e. keep writing, please, as none of the aforementioned critiques are uncorrectable).
The story had an engaging, warm, and thought-provoking spirit that many books are lacking today.