It's more 2.5 stars than 3, but because the subject is so riveting, I've rounded up.
As someone wise answered the question: "what's the best Led Zep bio?" with: "it hasn't been written yet!", I'll just have to take whatever is out there to satisfy some momentary urges.
Yorke's writing isn't bad, his proofreader/editor, however, has hopefully been fired.
But I have a bit of a problem with enthusiasts and admirers writing (definitive) biographies. Firstly, they are far from being definitive. And, then, they're utterly unable to be objective. And objectivity in writing (and Yorke was a journalist!) is good to round up the accounts, along with any of the essential constructive criticism. Come on, I'm - I wouldn't outright call myself a fan, but - a Zep enthusiast, and I know they're an amazing creative quartet that got together to churn out some of the most iconic sounds that have come to symbolise the 70s, but repeatedly proclaiming that is not what makes the story.
In my great regard and respect for the band, I am also happy to accept that everyone is far from perfect, and the lads probably are as well - in fact, as humanly as possible - so no need to paint them as golden gods that can do no wrong..
A lot of Yorke's material does seem to be first-hand, and some quotes were from face-to-face interviews, although for whatever reason - maybe he was closest to Page.. or Page was the most accessible or willing to be interviewed (by Yorke) - they're very Page-centric. So much so that he repeatedly refers to him as 'Pagey', while Jonesy just so remains John Paul Jones throughout the book. He's quite the character, would have loved to have gotten more insight on him!
I purposely chose this one because the reviews of Richard Cole's and Mick Wall's books were appalling. I don't need to fill in informational gaps on members of Zep, I would just like to read some good storylines. So, which should I take up next?