Not long ago, if you were ill, you’d see a doctor. Now, you go online.
Want to track your blood sugar? Your heart rate? Your sleep? You can. Need to focus? Want to lose weight fast? Everything is a click away.
But who, if anyone, is regulating this?
As NHS waiting times grow ever longer and patients in the US are priced out of medical care altogether, online health hacks have become indispensable. From mental wellbeing influencers promoting untested therapies, to entrepreneurs peddling their own alternative remedies, the advice seems to really make sense.
These self-styled experts glow with good health and they guarantee results but they don’t know us or our medical history. They don't owe us a duty of care. And they're rarely either qualified or impartial. So why do we trust them?
Really interesting, I’m afraid people who need to read it probably won’t.
I like how nuanced it is. Social media is not all bad, it can give people community or answers to people who feel failed by medicine. That being said social media is not where you will find the most accurate information. Most people are here to sell something (let’s be real), social media is also the place where actual science goes to die and personal anecdotes thrive.
It’s terrible (and I love that the author acknowledges that) that people who are being failed by the medical establishment are targets of people trying to make money. Social media and the art of influencing makes it so easy.
DNF at 100 pages. Just couldn’t get into it, often found it unnecessarily detailed on some studies that felt tangentially relevant, and then their linking explanation to the topic at hand was limited. Shame as I really wanted to enjoy this as it’s a fascinating topic!