What do you think?
Rate this book
Behind the Gospels: Understanding the Oral Tradition
New Testament scholars often talk about “oral tradition” as a means by which material about Jesus reached the writers of the Gospels; but despite the recent flowering of interest in oral tradition, the study of memory, and the role of eye-witnesses, the latest scholarly advances have yet to fully penetrate the mainstream of academic Gospels scholarship, let alone the wider public. There is no convenient book-length treatment that can be used by students, or indeed by anyone else wishing to be informed about this crucial topic. Behind the Gospels fills this gap, both by offering a general theoretical discussion of the nature of oral tradition and the formation of ancient texts, and by providing a critical survey of the field, from classical form-criticism down to the present day.
226 pages, Kindle Edition
First published May 16, 2013
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews
August 10, 2026
Eric Eve concisely but throughout provides a survey of contemporary oral tradition models behind the Synoptics. While he doesn't shy from sharing his scholarly perspective on the theories, he goes to great lengths to accurately portray each in a good light, and most of his critiques are backed by other contemporary gospel scholars. Outside of synthesizing other theories, he also contributes a brief survey of Markan material's relationship to shared Pauline and Josephan material, relating his findings to different models of oral tradition development. Overall a great intro to a critical topic in Synoptic development.
January 11, 2017
Really helpful survey of the current scholarship around oral tradition and the Gospels. Eve discusses in detail the development of ideas around how oral traditions shaped the writing of the Gospels, from the early form critics through to recent attempts to refocus on eye witness testimony, through the likes of Richard Bauckham (whose 'Jesus and the Eyewitnesses' gets a very mixed review).
In his conclusions Eve pumps for a very sensible middle way between those who would assert that most of what is in the Gospels is as close to verbatim testimony as is possible and those who claim that it's mostly a product of the Evangelists' imaginations and/or particular social contexts. Much depends on the presuppositions we bring to the texts.
An additional point that I found useful was the assertion mentioned in several places that the Gospels cannot be usefully dissected in such a way as to separate the historical core from later additions and redactive measures. This attempt to access 'the real Jesus' may have sustained many author's careers, but is unlikely to ever purposive satisfactory results, due to the reductive process involved.
In his conclusions Eve pumps for a very sensible middle way between those who would assert that most of what is in the Gospels is as close to verbatim testimony as is possible and those who claim that it's mostly a product of the Evangelists' imaginations and/or particular social contexts. Much depends on the presuppositions we bring to the texts.
An additional point that I found useful was the assertion mentioned in several places that the Gospels cannot be usefully dissected in such a way as to separate the historical core from later additions and redactive measures. This attempt to access 'the real Jesus' may have sustained many author's careers, but is unlikely to ever purposive satisfactory results, due to the reductive process involved.
June 3, 2026
Hard to rate. This book explores the nature of the "Jesus Tradition" between His death and resurrection and the committing of this - and His prior ministry - to writing. Eve takes the near-consensus view that Mark was the first Gospel, which scholars date to around 70 AD. The author is not one to make hasty judgements: most of his assertions are hedged about by qualifications - which for me is a positive. It does mean though that the end of the book (a Conclusion that seems to conclude very little) might seem something of an anti-climax.
The closest we have to a definitive closing statement is that "The oral tradition was not a stream flowing into the Gospel texts only to be frozen there; rather it was part of the biosphere in which the Gospels took shape and in which they were first used and performed. To the extent that the Gospels are oral-derived texts, ... ‘Voices from the Past’, they may originally have been intended to resonate with the ongoing oral tradition and social memory of the communities that employed them."
The bulk of the book is a critique of various academic attempts to define the tradition that informed Paul's epistles and the later Gospels, with Eve leaning (as the above quote suggests) toward a "social memory" model, of remembered tradition shaped, stabilized, and re-performed within communities. This approach shakes up the bag containing orality, written records, eye-witness accounts and memory, suggesting we begin to regard the relationship between these various ways of passing on the tradition as being more fluid than many of the academics discussed in the book were willing to allow. There is much of value here if you don't expect some great revelation.
The closest we have to a definitive closing statement is that "The oral tradition was not a stream flowing into the Gospel texts only to be frozen there; rather it was part of the biosphere in which the Gospels took shape and in which they were first used and performed. To the extent that the Gospels are oral-derived texts, ... ‘Voices from the Past’, they may originally have been intended to resonate with the ongoing oral tradition and social memory of the communities that employed them."
The bulk of the book is a critique of various academic attempts to define the tradition that informed Paul's epistles and the later Gospels, with Eve leaning (as the above quote suggests) toward a "social memory" model, of remembered tradition shaped, stabilized, and re-performed within communities. This approach shakes up the bag containing orality, written records, eye-witness accounts and memory, suggesting we begin to regard the relationship between these various ways of passing on the tradition as being more fluid than many of the academics discussed in the book were willing to allow. There is much of value here if you don't expect some great revelation.
November 7, 2024
Walking through the history of understandings of how the Gospels came to be created, Mr. Eve offers a balanced analysis of each historical model/understanding. Each model is treated fairly, with adequate pros and cons articulated. Despite its academic nature, Behind the Gospels is accessible, though not wholly engaging. Mr. Eve tries his best to find the good in each model, and he does a good job of connecting each model to its successor. This positive approach is refreshing and helps the reader see the good in each model. As a result, Behind the Gospels is an interesting albeit somewhat dry read that is helpful for understanding how the Gospels may have been formed by the original authors.
His conclusion, that we likely will never know exactly how the Gospels came to be, is a bit disheartening and feels like a letdown, but it is realistic. After reading the book, I came to a greater understanding of why it is difficult to know the origin of the Gospels, and I learned a lot about social memory, memory in general, oral retellings, and eyewitness accounts. Though not the most exciting read, it is balanced, informative, and well-researched.
His conclusion, that we likely will never know exactly how the Gospels came to be, is a bit disheartening and feels like a letdown, but it is realistic. After reading the book, I came to a greater understanding of why it is difficult to know the origin of the Gospels, and I learned a lot about social memory, memory in general, oral retellings, and eyewitness accounts. Though not the most exciting read, it is balanced, informative, and well-researched.
April 23, 2019
Great summaries of scholarship
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5 reviews