** I am doing a re-read of the James Bond books, including the classic Ian Fleming, followed by John Gardner, Raymond Benson, and the other estate approved editions. My goal is to read and review each one in chronological order (as much as possible) with as much honesty and reflection that I can give. **
Background / Notes – This is the second James Bond novel authorized by the Ian Fleming estate and written by Anthony Horowitz. Horowitz was given some original source material by the Fleming estate - an outline for a TV series that was never made – to use in the book. It was published in 2018 as a prequel to Fleming’s first Bond novel, “Casino Royale” and it is where I will begin my re-read.
Plotline – Two words: “Prequel Bond.” The book starts off back in 1950 when James Bond, an agent in the British Secret Service, has not yet earned his double-O (permission to kill) status. This is the story of how James was developing into the Bond that Ian Fleming introduced to the world to in his classic “Casino Royale” novel. The prequel starts off with the current 007 agent turning up dead – shot three times and left floating in the waters of the French Rivera. M, the head of the British Secret service, decides it’s time to promote Commander Bond, and sends the new 007 to the south of France to find out what happened to his predecessor.
Bond’s mission takes him to several exotic locales, including Stockholm, Nice, Monte Carlo, French Riviera, and even Southern California.
Bond is introduced to several new and mysterious characters who interact and challenge him, including Sixtine, a sultry fatal and former British secret agent during the war and now an independent entrepreneur; Scipio, a grotesque Corsican gangster with even more grotesque tastes; Irwin Wolfe, an arrogant American industrialist who has invented a new way to film movies; and Reade Griffith, a CIA agent with his own agenda (and not related to Fleming’s established Felix Leiter).
Favorite Lines – “You make love like a schoolboy. I’m sure you’ve had plenty of girls, James, but you’ve never had a woman and you’ve still got a lot to learn.” Sixtine to James Bond (p.169). “You will not know what I am going to do, whether I will provide you with pleasure… or pain.” Scipio to James Bond (p.227).
Thoughts and Reflections – There are a several reasons I absolutely love about this book. And it seems a bit strange to start off re-reading all of the James Bond books without starting with the master and creator himself, Ian Fleming. Still, in my opinion, Horowitz does a lot of good things well.
First, with this being a prequel, Horowitz presents a younger version of James, where he is physically strong, but still learning and developing into the experienced and savvy agent that he will one day become. This James made mistakes during the mission, some of them costly and deadly. Still, he was an authentic human that was learning to use his brain rather than just rely on instincts. As much as I want my Bond to do things that seem impossible, they still need to be based in a realistic world.
Second, Horowitz creates a cast of characters that as close to the ones in Flemings books that I have seen in a quite a while. They aren’t cartoonish or have silly names. Each of them had a background, uniqueness of character, and especially Sixtine – she captured a special place in my heart. James and she share an evening when she shares the story of her life during the war and the decisions she’s made that really define her strength and resiliency. She is not just pretty woman who falls into James arms because he walks into the room. Rather she challenges and strengthens him.
Third, Horowitz creates a strong plot and pacing to match. Writing a Bond novel must be one of the toughest challenges a writer can face. Stepping into an established world where expectations are high and the ways to fail are many, seems like an unbelievable task to willingly take on. However, I was very surprised at how well Horowitz delivered on this absolutely key element. The setting in is in the early fifties, before the modern-day technology that exists today, but he keeps the plot focused, moving, and tied together throughout the story. Except for a few clichés that spring up through-out the book, the moments of intense action are balanced by interaction and dialogue that take you back to the vision that Fleming created. I don’t want to give too much away, but there are several scenes where Bond is faced with the results of his actions and coming to terms with them were critical to his character development. One scene especially involving heroin was especially well written and presented in such a raw and personal way that the memories will be ingrained in my mind for quite a while.
Overall – First of all, let me be absolutely clear. Ian Fleming is the king when it comes to James Bond and everyone pales in comparison. That’s a given. However, of all the writers stepping into Fleming’s world, Horowitz does a worthy job in his second outing. The good things heavily outweigh the few cliched clunkers. My advice is, if you like your James Bond authentic, gritty, and realistic, give this one a try. It will be worth it.
Next Book – “Casino Royale.”