What do you think?
Rate this book
Where It All Went Wrong: The case against John Howard
On the thirtieth anniversary of John Howard coming to power, a searing analysis of the untouchable prime the story of how the ‘great economic manager’ sold away our future.
John Howard is often revered as one of the great Australian prime ministers (1996–2007): economically prudent, politically astute, ‘relaxed and comfortable’ with Australia’s identity, venerated by the Liberal Party and grudgingly admired by the Left.
Why then – just twenty years later after his government ended – are we in such a mess?
Amy Remeikis is one of our most astute and convincing political commentators, and here she argues for a complete revision of how we see Howard’s tenure, for the first time holding him to account against the future he created. Of our modern crises, most are caused by his policies. Housing crisis? Guilty. Work insecurity? Guilty. Giving away gas? Guilty. Climate denial? Guilty. Rise of the far right? Guilty. American lapdog in foreign relations? Guilty. Jingoistic tracksuits and flag-wrapping? Guilty and convicted.
Far from being ‘great economic managers’, the Howard government bought Boomer votes with franking credits and negative gearing, sacrificing the generations now inheriting the nation. They sold out their children and grandchildren for mining billionaires, investment properties and annual cruises.
Amy Remeikis is the highly informed voice of these dispossessed generations. In showing us where it all went wrong, she illuminates the path to a better future.
John Howard is often revered as one of the great Australian prime ministers (1996–2007): economically prudent, politically astute, ‘relaxed and comfortable’ with Australia’s identity, venerated by the Liberal Party and grudgingly admired by the Left.
Why then – just twenty years later after his government ended – are we in such a mess?
Amy Remeikis is one of our most astute and convincing political commentators, and here she argues for a complete revision of how we see Howard’s tenure, for the first time holding him to account against the future he created. Of our modern crises, most are caused by his policies. Housing crisis? Guilty. Work insecurity? Guilty. Giving away gas? Guilty. Climate denial? Guilty. Rise of the far right? Guilty. American lapdog in foreign relations? Guilty. Jingoistic tracksuits and flag-wrapping? Guilty and convicted.
Far from being ‘great economic managers’, the Howard government bought Boomer votes with franking credits and negative gearing, sacrificing the generations now inheriting the nation. They sold out their children and grandchildren for mining billionaires, investment properties and annual cruises.
Amy Remeikis is the highly informed voice of these dispossessed generations. In showing us where it all went wrong, she illuminates the path to a better future.
200 pages, Kindle Edition
Published February 24, 2026
About the author
Amy Remeikis
8 books28 followersAmy Remeikis is a political journalist, author and commentator who covered Parliament for the Guardian Australia and regularly appears on ABC radio and TV and The Project on Channel Ten. She is Chief Political Strategist at The Australia Institute.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 66 reviews
March 6, 2026
I am an American who didn't even know who John Howard was going into this. However, I will read any and everything Amy Remeikis writes and I recommend others do the same. This is well-researched, engaging, and enraging. For those that are saying it leans "too" angry - I recommend her upcoming book Screw Nice.
March 4, 2026
This book challenges the legacy of John Howard, who is considered by many to be 'Australia's Greatest Prime Minister'. It breaks down many of his 'achievements' and explains that they are either complete myths, or worse, are actually the genesis of so many of our problems today.
Let's start with the obvious one, that he and the LNP are 'superior economic managers'. Keating has described the 'double rainbow' Howard and Costello were smacked on the arse with, being global economic growth, and the property/mining boom happening at the same time. These economic factors were happening anyway regardless of who was in the drivers seat, so to give credit for economic growth to Howard is nonsensical. In fact, Australia UNDERPERFORMED against OECD growth rates during Howards era. This tells us he actually squandered the opportunity by choosing to line the pockets large businesses and the wealthy, rather than reinvesting in the country.
Speaking of - his introduction of the Capital Gains Tax discount has royally screwed the housing market. This coupled with free reign for investors to hoard properties using negative gearing to offset losses means generations (plural) will never own a house. The CGT discount remains to this day is probably the most damning thing Howard did.
There is a lot more. As CEO of culture wars and master of the dog whistle, under Howard there was a huge increase in the fetishisation of the flag, Australia Day, and Anzac Day. Remeikis points out the hypocrisy of Howard's suggestion that we as a nation should not take responsibility for our past sins, yet we are allowed to bask in the glory of our 'good' history.
Remeikis covers it all, migration, privatisation, industrial relations, our relationship with the US. The worst parts of each were instigated or accelerated by the Howard government.
I do try to think of myself as a pragmatic voter than can see all sides but honestly the more you think about it, the more difficult it is to identify anything positive the Coalition has contributed to Australian society over the last 40 years. Medicare, superannuation, floating the AUD was all Labor. Every 'achievement' of the coalition is either attributable to macro / global economic factors that would have occurred even if my dog was PM, or was a short term sugar hit that has come back to bite us.
Howard's legacy is creating a situation that has 1) forced the Coalition to implode on itself, and 2) forced Labor to become a centrist (at best) party. This is a grand success for elites and the wealthy, and nightmare for literally everyone else.
Chat are we cooked.
8/10 --> 4 stars.
Let's start with the obvious one, that he and the LNP are 'superior economic managers'. Keating has described the 'double rainbow' Howard and Costello were smacked on the arse with, being global economic growth, and the property/mining boom happening at the same time. These economic factors were happening anyway regardless of who was in the drivers seat, so to give credit for economic growth to Howard is nonsensical. In fact, Australia UNDERPERFORMED against OECD growth rates during Howards era. This tells us he actually squandered the opportunity by choosing to line the pockets large businesses and the wealthy, rather than reinvesting in the country.
Speaking of - his introduction of the Capital Gains Tax discount has royally screwed the housing market. This coupled with free reign for investors to hoard properties using negative gearing to offset losses means generations (plural) will never own a house. The CGT discount remains to this day is probably the most damning thing Howard did.
There is a lot more. As CEO of culture wars and master of the dog whistle, under Howard there was a huge increase in the fetishisation of the flag, Australia Day, and Anzac Day. Remeikis points out the hypocrisy of Howard's suggestion that we as a nation should not take responsibility for our past sins, yet we are allowed to bask in the glory of our 'good' history.
Remeikis covers it all, migration, privatisation, industrial relations, our relationship with the US. The worst parts of each were instigated or accelerated by the Howard government.
I do try to think of myself as a pragmatic voter than can see all sides but honestly the more you think about it, the more difficult it is to identify anything positive the Coalition has contributed to Australian society over the last 40 years. Medicare, superannuation, floating the AUD was all Labor. Every 'achievement' of the coalition is either attributable to macro / global economic factors that would have occurred even if my dog was PM, or was a short term sugar hit that has come back to bite us.
Howard's legacy is creating a situation that has 1) forced the Coalition to implode on itself, and 2) forced Labor to become a centrist (at best) party. This is a grand success for elites and the wealthy, and nightmare for literally everyone else.
Chat are we cooked.
8/10 --> 4 stars.
Review of advance copy
As someone in their early 40s, a self-described "Social Democrat," I agree with most of the book's broad arguments, albeit less stridently than Remeikis.
The book reads like a very well-written polemic, which may be its intent. Regardless, it should have aimed higher.
I understand that this book is intended for someone younger than me, who didn't come of age in the Howard era. However, the book requires sophisticated political knowledge, and those interested in reading it would likely already have a position on the Howard Government. Consequently, the book will not change anyone's opinion on the subject.
This book is also an argument for why the retrospective of a government, particularly one lasting 11 years, cannot be the size of a novella.
While the book does a sufficient job of placing Howard's legacy in the context of modern Australia, it does a poor job of placing its ideology and policy objectives in historical context. The book would be better served if it spent a few chapters at the beginning assessing how Howard was influenced by the governments of Thatcher and Reagan, the reforms of "Rogernomics" in New Zealand, and, yes, even the Hawke and Keating Governments.
This context is particularly lacking when the book describes the trajectory of social policy in Australia. It was the economic rationalist policies of Hawke and Keating that entrenched the free market in this country, and set the stage for Remeikis's criticisms of the decay in housing, childcare, health, education, and employment.
Of course, Howard continued to open these floodgates, adding even more water. As Remeikis writes, Howard also put his own ideological spin on Australian culture, shaping it and stamping his view of it on the historical record.
The book is at its best when discussing economic policy. The strength of that chapter summarises the work of earlier writers such as George Megalogenis and Paul Kelly, arguing that Howard's economic record is one of good fortune, rather than of good management, thanks to the efforts of his predecessors. The chapter stresses that Howard was in the right place at the right time. It's a point that could have been made more explicitly across the entire book.
There is no doubt that Howard remains the dominant figure who has shaped this generation. However, his influence was cemented through his political acumen rather than continuing policy reforms that had already begun across the globe. You can see flashes of a good book at times, but to do a proper job, its length needed to be doubled, or at the very least increased by a third. Context matters, especially when assessing a government one generation removed, which won four consecutive elections. For this reason, Remeikis only skims the surface of John Howard’s influence on Australian society.
The book reads like a very well-written polemic, which may be its intent. Regardless, it should have aimed higher.
I understand that this book is intended for someone younger than me, who didn't come of age in the Howard era. However, the book requires sophisticated political knowledge, and those interested in reading it would likely already have a position on the Howard Government. Consequently, the book will not change anyone's opinion on the subject.
This book is also an argument for why the retrospective of a government, particularly one lasting 11 years, cannot be the size of a novella.
While the book does a sufficient job of placing Howard's legacy in the context of modern Australia, it does a poor job of placing its ideology and policy objectives in historical context. The book would be better served if it spent a few chapters at the beginning assessing how Howard was influenced by the governments of Thatcher and Reagan, the reforms of "Rogernomics" in New Zealand, and, yes, even the Hawke and Keating Governments.
This context is particularly lacking when the book describes the trajectory of social policy in Australia. It was the economic rationalist policies of Hawke and Keating that entrenched the free market in this country, and set the stage for Remeikis's criticisms of the decay in housing, childcare, health, education, and employment.
Of course, Howard continued to open these floodgates, adding even more water. As Remeikis writes, Howard also put his own ideological spin on Australian culture, shaping it and stamping his view of it on the historical record.
The book is at its best when discussing economic policy. The strength of that chapter summarises the work of earlier writers such as George Megalogenis and Paul Kelly, arguing that Howard's economic record is one of good fortune, rather than of good management, thanks to the efforts of his predecessors. The chapter stresses that Howard was in the right place at the right time. It's a point that could have been made more explicitly across the entire book.
There is no doubt that Howard remains the dominant figure who has shaped this generation. However, his influence was cemented through his political acumen rather than continuing policy reforms that had already begun across the globe. You can see flashes of a good book at times, but to do a proper job, its length needed to be doubled, or at the very least increased by a third. Context matters, especially when assessing a government one generation removed, which won four consecutive elections. For this reason, Remeikis only skims the surface of John Howard’s influence on Australian society.
May 26, 2026
I read this in paperback. All twelve chapters are five stars. I had to take a breather between some chapters. A great reference book. A sweet irony, cutting down the legs of Menzies' desk.
"When he became prime minister, . . . upended tradition, . . . removing the specially designed furniture from the prime minister's suite and insisting Robert Menzies's desk be hauled from Old Parliament House and installed in Howard's official office. In a perfect metaphor for how Howard ruled, they didn't care enough about preserving history to ensure it remained untouched. Menzies's desk was for a much taller man and therefore had to be cut down to fit Howard's shorter frame. But for Howard it was the principle."
"When he became prime minister, . . . upended tradition, . . . removing the specially designed furniture from the prime minister's suite and insisting Robert Menzies's desk be hauled from Old Parliament House and installed in Howard's official office. In a perfect metaphor for how Howard ruled, they didn't care enough about preserving history to ensure it remained untouched. Menzies's desk was for a much taller man and therefore had to be cut down to fit Howard's shorter frame. But for Howard it was the principle."
April 5, 2026
3.8/5
Growing up during the 00s, I heard a lot about (and still do) about how well respected a Prime Minister John Howard was. Being too little to understand, and only picking up disjointed snippets of politics coverage on national TV about indigenous rights, or the war "on terror", or carbon emissions trading, this went unquestioned. In more recent times, I've come to know an anti-Howard narrative, framed in the context of Australia's housing woes.
Seeing Amy Remeikis' book on Howard had been released, I was super curious to learn more about what kind of policies Howard put in place, and what kind of person he actually had been as Prime Minister. What I took away from this book is that much of the political & legislative cowardice in the governments succeeding Howard's, can be better described as an unwillingness to challenge Howard's version of Australia: one that neglected Indigenous people, asylum seekers, migrants, the unemployed, the otherwise downtrodden, but gave handouts to corporate interests, employers, and cut accessibility and quality of education. One shudders to think what would have happened if Howard was able to "stab [Medicare] in the guts" like he wanted to. Howard really represented the worst of fearmongering and neoliberalism, seeking to benefit primarily white, middle and upper-class Australia, and screwed over everyone else, while creating the myth that he was batting for the "ordinary" Australian. Remeikis highlights that Howard's effectiveness came from his conviction, and his reasonable facade; he knew which "notes to play" politically.
Remeikis draws a parallel from Margaret Thatcher's assertion that her greatest achievement was "Tony Blair", to today's Labor Party, suggesting that they are indeed Howard's greatest achievement. I have to agree - given the thumping mandate given to Labor in the last federal election, it's mindblowing how impotent the current Labor government have been in the way of reverting Howardian changes that led to our housing crisis, the decline of quality & accessibility in higher education, and the defanging of unions in the country, to name a few things. Legislative cowardice aside, they can't even depart from the Howard-era sycophancy for the United States, being the first to back their and Israel's unprovoked war against Iran (justified with the very creative, as yet unheard of "they're about to get WMDs" line).
Amy Remeikis is armed with data, and each chapter is filled with notes pointing to Howard himself, or journalists at the time, or other publicly available data. Despite that in some instances I found myself lacking context or enough info:
In addition to this, Amy Remeikis' (rightful) frustration really comes through in the form of dripping sarcasm in this book. While I share her frustration at the situations she describes, personally the sarcasm sometimes got in the way of understanding the substance of her argument and the facts she was presenting.
Overall I think this was a really good overview of Howard's policies, and fleshed out a lot of gaps I had in my knowledge about that topic. I would've appreciated a little more deep analysis on how and why parts of his policies persist today, but I can see it would've made for a more laborious (pun intended) read. Instead of a deep, extensive analysis, I would describe this as a primer on the case against Howard, and a good starting point to understand more. Highly recommend this to anyone who's interested in the provenance of modern Australia's struggles.
Growing up during the 00s, I heard a lot about (and still do) about how well respected a Prime Minister John Howard was. Being too little to understand, and only picking up disjointed snippets of politics coverage on national TV about indigenous rights, or the war "on terror", or carbon emissions trading, this went unquestioned. In more recent times, I've come to know an anti-Howard narrative, framed in the context of Australia's housing woes.
Seeing Amy Remeikis' book on Howard had been released, I was super curious to learn more about what kind of policies Howard put in place, and what kind of person he actually had been as Prime Minister. What I took away from this book is that much of the political & legislative cowardice in the governments succeeding Howard's, can be better described as an unwillingness to challenge Howard's version of Australia: one that neglected Indigenous people, asylum seekers, migrants, the unemployed, the otherwise downtrodden, but gave handouts to corporate interests, employers, and cut accessibility and quality of education. One shudders to think what would have happened if Howard was able to "stab [Medicare] in the guts" like he wanted to. Howard really represented the worst of fearmongering and neoliberalism, seeking to benefit primarily white, middle and upper-class Australia, and screwed over everyone else, while creating the myth that he was batting for the "ordinary" Australian. Remeikis highlights that Howard's effectiveness came from his conviction, and his reasonable facade; he knew which "notes to play" politically.
Remeikis draws a parallel from Margaret Thatcher's assertion that her greatest achievement was "Tony Blair", to today's Labor Party, suggesting that they are indeed Howard's greatest achievement. I have to agree - given the thumping mandate given to Labor in the last federal election, it's mindblowing how impotent the current Labor government have been in the way of reverting Howardian changes that led to our housing crisis, the decline of quality & accessibility in higher education, and the defanging of unions in the country, to name a few things. Legislative cowardice aside, they can't even depart from the Howard-era sycophancy for the United States, being the first to back their and Israel's unprovoked war against Iran (justified with the very creative, as yet unheard of "they're about to get WMDs" line).
Amy Remeikis is armed with data, and each chapter is filled with notes pointing to Howard himself, or journalists at the time, or other publicly available data. Despite that in some instances I found myself lacking context or enough info:
"Family reunion visa entries shrank from 80 per cent in 1998 to roughly 20 per cent by 2013."Found myself scratching my head at this wondering "A percentage of what? All visas offered? That doesn't sound right."
In addition to this, Amy Remeikis' (rightful) frustration really comes through in the form of dripping sarcasm in this book. While I share her frustration at the situations she describes, personally the sarcasm sometimes got in the way of understanding the substance of her argument and the facts she was presenting.
Overall I think this was a really good overview of Howard's policies, and fleshed out a lot of gaps I had in my knowledge about that topic. I would've appreciated a little more deep analysis on how and why parts of his policies persist today, but I can see it would've made for a more laborious (pun intended) read. Instead of a deep, extensive analysis, I would describe this as a primer on the case against Howard, and a good starting point to understand more. Highly recommend this to anyone who's interested in the provenance of modern Australia's struggles.
June 18, 2026
If you want to learn how neo-liberalism and conservatism ruined Australia, this book is for you. If you want to know how both of those things came packaged in the person named John Howard, a man who single-handedly destroyed the country, this book is also for you!
Scathing, accurate, astute and witty. Really enjoyed this analysis of Howard and his legacy. We do not hate him enough. This book is split up into different sections, including housing, immigration, social welfare etc etc and goes through each of his policies in the respective areas that make the country worse off today. It’s actually incredibly harrowing to read about how one man managed to stay in power so long and wreak havoc on so many of the good policies set up by governments before. And don’t get me started on the privatisations.
Highly recommend for understanding why the current political landscape in Aus is the way it is.
Scathing, accurate, astute and witty. Really enjoyed this analysis of Howard and his legacy. We do not hate him enough. This book is split up into different sections, including housing, immigration, social welfare etc etc and goes through each of his policies in the respective areas that make the country worse off today. It’s actually incredibly harrowing to read about how one man managed to stay in power so long and wreak havoc on so many of the good policies set up by governments before. And don’t get me started on the privatisations.
Highly recommend for understanding why the current political landscape in Aus is the way it is.
April 26, 2026
A little superficial. Would have liked more historical context, global comparisons and detailed analysis.
March 9, 2026
Great book that reminds us that we really don't hate John Howard anywhere enough and he deserves so much more.
May 3, 2026
For the past two decades the Liberal Party of Australia, by incrementally rewriting history, have gradually transformed the Prime Ministership of John Howard (1996-2007) into a supposed mythical golden age in Australia. Simultaneously over that same period, Australia has been spiralling into social, cultural, and economic decline as a direct result of the deliberate legacy policies and cultural shifts wrought by John Howard. In ‘Where It All Went Wrong: The Case Against John Howard’, journalist Amy Remekis holds Howard to account for our myriad of modern crises: the current housing crisis; culture wars; hateful societal division; wealth inequality; the cost of living crisis; immigration and indigenous racism; spiralling national debt; climate change inaction and power costs; prohibitive education costs; declining educational standards; prohibitive childcare costs; and the gradual privatisation of our health system. The author factually and convincingly shows that Howard, through his extreme conservatism and philosophy of economic rationalism set the nation up to fail. In fact, the author suggests there are also many other additional crises which she chooses not to explore (which begs the question, why?) Frustratingly, in this Trumpian age where truth matters so little and the electorate is disengaged, this important and confronting book will probably only be read by those who already are aware of the utter destruction caused by John Howard and his government, whereas this book should actually be essential reading for all Australians.
June 23, 2026
good morning to everyone except john howard
March 1, 2026
Remeikis doesn’t just revisit the legacy of John Howard. She systematically addresses the issues that Australia faces today and the role that Howard played in their architecture. Housing crisis, culture wars, racial tension, immigration scapegoating, work insecurity, climate inaction, and more. This book is uncompromising. Succinct analysis rather than wistfully looking back on ‘the good ole days’.
What I loved most?
✨ The way Remeikis balances rigorous research with readable prose. It is accessible but not dumbed down.
✨ Her unflinching willingness to challenge the “untouchable” narratives around Howard’s legacy.
✨ How this book made me reflect differently on Australia’s political trajectory.
If you care about Australian politics, history, or social justice, add this one to your shelf. It’s compelling, provocative, and so relevant to today’s debates.
What I loved most?
✨ The way Remeikis balances rigorous research with readable prose. It is accessible but not dumbed down.
✨ Her unflinching willingness to challenge the “untouchable” narratives around Howard’s legacy.
✨ How this book made me reflect differently on Australia’s political trajectory.
If you care about Australian politics, history, or social justice, add this one to your shelf. It’s compelling, provocative, and so relevant to today’s debates.
March 26, 2026
I always believed that the genius of John Howard was that he convinced every day Australian’s that he was on their side when the opposite was true.
Amy’s deep dive into the dark corners of John Howard’s time as Prime Minister is mind blowing 🤯
There doesn’t seem to be anything left unscathed- current issues such as childcare, aged care, housing, lack of action on environmental issues, lack of social cohesion, racism, rise of far right extremism……..all the worse for Howard’s policies.
Amy’s deep dive into the dark corners of John Howard’s time as Prime Minister is mind blowing 🤯
There doesn’t seem to be anything left unscathed- current issues such as childcare, aged care, housing, lack of action on environmental issues, lack of social cohesion, racism, rise of far right extremism……..all the worse for Howard’s policies.
April 20, 2026
WOW I HATE HIM
April 7, 2026
I went to high school with a kid named Bradman, who I hated. His parents must have hated him even more to be hitching him to Howard nationalism for the rest of his life.
May 17, 2026
Want to give it four stars but a superficial analysis of the Howard era. Needs more data and less polemical ranting about the consequences and failings of that era.
April 16, 2026
Where It All Went Wrong is an informative but confronting examination of the many structures in modern Australia that can be traced back to decisions made during the Howard era, spanning areas including housing, foreign policy, welfare, industrial relations, and broader political culture.
Whilst the book was undeniably well-researched and informative, it was not always an enjoyable read, leaning more toward political indictment than unbiased and reflective analysis. However, it does provide a compelling analysis of the lasting influence of Howard's worldview, offering a perspective that encourages readers to think more critically of a relatively stable period of political history in recent times.
Whilst the book was undeniably well-researched and informative, it was not always an enjoyable read, leaning more toward political indictment than unbiased and reflective analysis. However, it does provide a compelling analysis of the lasting influence of Howard's worldview, offering a perspective that encourages readers to think more critically of a relatively stable period of political history in recent times.
April 4, 2026
A breazy read, introducing a new generation to former Prime Minister John Howard's many shortcomings. Chapters on the economy, housing, and immigration are particularly excellent.
But an overview it is - often asserting its points more than arguing, and seemingly based almost solely on secondary sources. And if "?utm_source=chatgpt.com" means anything to you, you'll share my disappointment with one of the footnotes!
That said, as someone who lived through Howard, my impression is I'm not the target audience for this book - and as a summary across his most noxious contributions to Australia it is wholly effective.
But an overview it is - often asserting its points more than arguing, and seemingly based almost solely on secondary sources. And if "?utm_source=chatgpt.com" means anything to you, you'll share my disappointment with one of the footnotes!
That said, as someone who lived through Howard, my impression is I'm not the target audience for this book - and as a summary across his most noxious contributions to Australia it is wholly effective.
April 11, 2026
Attack the outcomes and you attack the man. This is a powerful dismantling of the legend that is John Howard, a man who created a mythology about Australia that is still maintained and believed today. The pains of the past still felt today and that future leaders will be apologising for.
Amy presents a need for someone to step up and be the nation changing leader that Howard was. Whether that will ever happen, I doubt it.
Great stuff.
Amy presents a need for someone to step up and be the nation changing leader that Howard was. Whether that will ever happen, I doubt it.
Great stuff.
July 11, 2026
I had to keep putting this book down every so often because it just made me so angry, remembering all the things Howard did and the legacy he left for us - his mark is on every problem our country has now. Ugh enraging.
May 29, 2026
Massive fan of a good old fashioned, well researched political rinsing. Immediately started reading again once I finished with the highlighter and sticky notes.
June 6, 2026
Thank you, Amy, for reminding me I’ve been a hater from a young age. Ruddock, Reith, Costello, Vanstone, Brough, Hockey. Names I had all but forgotten, brought back to the forefront of my mind. My husband enjoyed my many expletive filled exclamations while I devoured this book. And to the craven, gutless, impotent, modern Labor Party, take a fucking hint.
July 4, 2026
as a left leaning lady i agree with everything in the book
March 19, 2026
This book confirms much of what I already knew and deeply believed, so, preaching to the choir, but it was delicious
March 11, 2026
An excellent examination of the long-lasting effects of the Howard Coalition government on contemporary Australia. Remeikis strongly presents the case of how the Howard government is responsible for stifling progressive action in Australia from a range of areas including society and culture, foreign affairs and economic policy.
May 21, 2026
I enjoyed reading this. Even as a staunch critic of John Howard, I felt Amy was a bit zealous in attributing all of the woes in contemporary Australia to him personally. Was entertaining though.
March 16, 2026
I agree with the central premise of the book but feel the case could have been made more comprehensively and completely.
May 2, 2026
Ooo Amy you big mad and I love it because I’m big mad too.
All the things I’ve been shouting for years nicely organised into a very easily digested book.
I am so tired of the “well he got rid of the guns”. Yeah cool. If Keating or Beazley or Fraser or Hewson had been PM at the time they would have too. It was timing not the person. Other than that he gutted the country. And we’re still living it.
“And so let’s us finally thirty years later, tell the truth on Howard: He gutted the nation’s soul.”
Someone give this to Albo, Wong, chalmers et al and tell them to get out of the shadows and grow a spine before it’s too late.
All the things I’ve been shouting for years nicely organised into a very easily digested book.
I am so tired of the “well he got rid of the guns”. Yeah cool. If Keating or Beazley or Fraser or Hewson had been PM at the time they would have too. It was timing not the person. Other than that he gutted the country. And we’re still living it.
“And so let’s us finally thirty years later, tell the truth on Howard: He gutted the nation’s soul.”
Someone give this to Albo, Wong, chalmers et al and tell them to get out of the shadows and grow a spine before it’s too late.
February 27, 2026
for a book that holds an almost identical view on howard to myself, i'm surprised by how difficult i found this to read. this is a very, very angry book, and while that anger is justified and entirely understandable, it's hard to read in long stretches without needing to take a break and do something a bit less depressing.
this is probably in part due to the medium i read the book in - an audiobook. the book was read by remeikis herself and, well, she probably should have gotten someone else to do it. not that she has a bad voice or that it's inherently inappropriate to read your own book, but the book is clearly a deeply personal one and her anger comes across very strongly. this might be energising to another reader, i found it made reading a bit of a chore. beyond this, the actual recording of the audiobook changes tone DRAMATICALLY between chapters, with remeikis speaking in a relatively heated tone at the end of one chapter and then sounding almost sedated in comparison when the next one comes around. combined with a few odd mispronunciations of words, it feels like the direction for the audiobook was not particularly good. i recognise that this is a fairly minor criticism but it did add to the overall difficulty in reading the book
luckily you aren't dealing with those issues for too long, because the book itself is quite short. this isn't a good thing. remeikis mentions at the end that there are many other things she could have covered; it's hard to see why she didn't. if you're essentially firing this book at howard's position in australian political history, why not use every piece of ammunition you've got? the stuff that's there is good and is quite frustrating to relive (especially because i read howards biography this year and being reminded what a turd he is is a fresh wound), why not keep going?
the real saving grace of the book is that, of course, remeikis is entirely correct. every point she makes is backed up with examples, there is a wealth of them, and they paint a dramatically unappealing picture of howard. the content itself is damning and it's essentially just listing his actions and the subsequent consequences. it's well structured and serves as a good primer on howard's more egregious decisions. they work well to express the book's core thesis that howard is essentially seen as being almost apolitical these days, given his success in reframing his personal beliefs as being the default state that any changes need to be considered against. it would take a particularly intransigent reader to come away from this book taking any other position
it does feel like the book is aimed at a certain reader, in fact almost a specific person. this is a 200 page letter to anthony albanese telling him to please, please, PLEASE do something about any of the myriad problems that howard has left and which labor has left essentially untouched. if the broad strokes of the book are that howard used his unprecedented power to reshape the country in his image, then the flip side of that coin is that it would be fucking sick if albo would try and do something similar with labor values. the anger that undergirds the entire book isn't just for howard, you can sense a frustrated labor believer in the subtext, wondering aloud in increasingly frustrated terms why labor seems incapable of doing anything to dismantle howard's legacy. again, it's hard to disagree
this is a good book, and probably a better one if you actually read a physical copy rather than the audiobook. while it could be longer, the points it raises are valid and well argued - wanting more of a book is hardly a scathing criticism. the anger that runs throughout it is justified, and while it is sometimes a slightly uncomfortable read it's one that is likely going to become the standard for discussion of howard and his legacy. definitely recommend if you're considering reading it, if you're interested in australian politics you're probably going to be hearing about it anyway
this is probably in part due to the medium i read the book in - an audiobook. the book was read by remeikis herself and, well, she probably should have gotten someone else to do it. not that she has a bad voice or that it's inherently inappropriate to read your own book, but the book is clearly a deeply personal one and her anger comes across very strongly. this might be energising to another reader, i found it made reading a bit of a chore. beyond this, the actual recording of the audiobook changes tone DRAMATICALLY between chapters, with remeikis speaking in a relatively heated tone at the end of one chapter and then sounding almost sedated in comparison when the next one comes around. combined with a few odd mispronunciations of words, it feels like the direction for the audiobook was not particularly good. i recognise that this is a fairly minor criticism but it did add to the overall difficulty in reading the book
luckily you aren't dealing with those issues for too long, because the book itself is quite short. this isn't a good thing. remeikis mentions at the end that there are many other things she could have covered; it's hard to see why she didn't. if you're essentially firing this book at howard's position in australian political history, why not use every piece of ammunition you've got? the stuff that's there is good and is quite frustrating to relive (especially because i read howards biography this year and being reminded what a turd he is is a fresh wound), why not keep going?
the real saving grace of the book is that, of course, remeikis is entirely correct. every point she makes is backed up with examples, there is a wealth of them, and they paint a dramatically unappealing picture of howard. the content itself is damning and it's essentially just listing his actions and the subsequent consequences. it's well structured and serves as a good primer on howard's more egregious decisions. they work well to express the book's core thesis that howard is essentially seen as being almost apolitical these days, given his success in reframing his personal beliefs as being the default state that any changes need to be considered against. it would take a particularly intransigent reader to come away from this book taking any other position
it does feel like the book is aimed at a certain reader, in fact almost a specific person. this is a 200 page letter to anthony albanese telling him to please, please, PLEASE do something about any of the myriad problems that howard has left and which labor has left essentially untouched. if the broad strokes of the book are that howard used his unprecedented power to reshape the country in his image, then the flip side of that coin is that it would be fucking sick if albo would try and do something similar with labor values. the anger that undergirds the entire book isn't just for howard, you can sense a frustrated labor believer in the subtext, wondering aloud in increasingly frustrated terms why labor seems incapable of doing anything to dismantle howard's legacy. again, it's hard to disagree
this is a good book, and probably a better one if you actually read a physical copy rather than the audiobook. while it could be longer, the points it raises are valid and well argued - wanting more of a book is hardly a scathing criticism. the anger that runs throughout it is justified, and while it is sometimes a slightly uncomfortable read it's one that is likely going to become the standard for discussion of howard and his legacy. definitely recommend if you're considering reading it, if you're interested in australian politics you're probably going to be hearing about it anyway
June 28, 2026
When I saw this book in the bookshop I leapt on it, because I’ve long believed that John Howard’s regime started the rot which our country has since slid into. There was a lot of good information in it, which I appreciated, and I will keep for future reference. She has done much good research.
In particular, I found the chapter on the Liberal party very interesting, as it unpicked the damage he did to that party, and hence to our democracy.
However, I was disappointed in a few things.
The book needed a good edit, and showed signs of being written as a journalist’s piece, without concern for the standards of book writing.
She jumps around between verb tenses at times, from past to present within a few paragraphs, which is confusing and unnecessary. I have no idea why she did this.
She ripped out all the “that’s”, journalese style, which impedes readability.
The book has an overblown adolescent and sarcastic tone which is annoying at times. This detracted from the book’s professionalism, and made it come across as a revenge piece.
Then on page 191, she completely left out SA in a list of states and territories and their Liberal parties, yet included ACT and Tasmania! She even said “That leaves Tasmania”… at the end, after omitting to mention SA!
I was disappointed that there were no chapters on the environment and the ABC, although she does mention the latter briefly at the end. These topics both deserved an in depth analysis.
Another glaring omission for me was the lack of impartial analysis of the way Howard ramped up economic immigration, while using his vilification of asylum seekers to distract the public from the impact of our increased population growth. He has explicitly mentioned this as a tactic in interviews. The result has been a dramatic increase in our population which was not scheduled to occur before then, in fact our population was supposed to peak at 23 million by now. Instead, it is at 28 million and continually increasing, with no sign of stabilisation or plans for a final figure in sight. Yet Howard made it taboo on the left to discuss the level of immigration, by making them anxious about accusations of racism.
Amy does not seem to understand this, because it appears she is part of the left that is in denial of the environmental and socioeconomic problems caused by our rapid population growth. Yet The Australia Institute, of which she is a part, clearly made the connection a decade or so ago. Amy even denies that our high immigration rate has affected our housing crisis, when there is plenty of evidence that it has. You only have to read a few property industry briefings for this to become clear.
She also doesn’t discuss how Howard damaged the power of the left and its ability to push for progressive economic policies, instead distracting it into culture wars on racism and LGBTQI issues. This is part of the neoliberal trend to push the left into issues of identity politics rather than progressive economic policies.
Soon in short, a useful book, but it could have had more depth and been professionally edited to make it stronger.
In particular, I found the chapter on the Liberal party very interesting, as it unpicked the damage he did to that party, and hence to our democracy.
However, I was disappointed in a few things.
The book needed a good edit, and showed signs of being written as a journalist’s piece, without concern for the standards of book writing.
She jumps around between verb tenses at times, from past to present within a few paragraphs, which is confusing and unnecessary. I have no idea why she did this.
She ripped out all the “that’s”, journalese style, which impedes readability.
The book has an overblown adolescent and sarcastic tone which is annoying at times. This detracted from the book’s professionalism, and made it come across as a revenge piece.
Then on page 191, she completely left out SA in a list of states and territories and their Liberal parties, yet included ACT and Tasmania! She even said “That leaves Tasmania”… at the end, after omitting to mention SA!
I was disappointed that there were no chapters on the environment and the ABC, although she does mention the latter briefly at the end. These topics both deserved an in depth analysis.
Another glaring omission for me was the lack of impartial analysis of the way Howard ramped up economic immigration, while using his vilification of asylum seekers to distract the public from the impact of our increased population growth. He has explicitly mentioned this as a tactic in interviews. The result has been a dramatic increase in our population which was not scheduled to occur before then, in fact our population was supposed to peak at 23 million by now. Instead, it is at 28 million and continually increasing, with no sign of stabilisation or plans for a final figure in sight. Yet Howard made it taboo on the left to discuss the level of immigration, by making them anxious about accusations of racism.
Amy does not seem to understand this, because it appears she is part of the left that is in denial of the environmental and socioeconomic problems caused by our rapid population growth. Yet The Australia Institute, of which she is a part, clearly made the connection a decade or so ago. Amy even denies that our high immigration rate has affected our housing crisis, when there is plenty of evidence that it has. You only have to read a few property industry briefings for this to become clear.
She also doesn’t discuss how Howard damaged the power of the left and its ability to push for progressive economic policies, instead distracting it into culture wars on racism and LGBTQI issues. This is part of the neoliberal trend to push the left into issues of identity politics rather than progressive economic policies.
Soon in short, a useful book, but it could have had more depth and been professionally edited to make it stronger.
March 13, 2026
I am quite depressed as I write this review. The conflict in Iran is getting worse and the long-term consequences are just so frightening. With “leaders” like Trump, Netanyahu, Putin, Jinping, Modi, Milei (Argentina) el Sisi (Egypt), Orban (Hungary) Kim Jon Un (Nth Korea), Erdogan (Turkey), Maduro (Venezuela), Jair Messias Bolsonaro (Brazil), Duterte (Philippines) Keir Starmer, Nigel Farage. I ask myself what future does the planet have? At best they seem ineffectual, at worst they are downright evil. Where are the leaders who want to live in peace, make their country profitable, equitable and improving for all its citizens?
John Howard does not fit comfortably in this list. He is not a “bad” person, but rather a skilled politician with stamina and an ideology that is now part of many western democracies of today. Howard did to Australia what Ronald Reagen did to the US. Paul Keating famously said in 1996, "When you change the government, you change the country." John Howard's Coalition government sure did that.
Amy Remeikis runs a critical eye over the Howard Government with particular focus on the man himself. Remekis is highly critical of Howard but she is methodical and exact in her research and her opinions. For the reader who is supportive of Howard they will find the book’s tone confronting. Remeikis’s position is clear, and the analysis is unapologetically critical.
Remeikis covers all of Howard’s policies: taxation, health, education migration, privatisation, industrial relations, our relationship with the US.
A supplementary argument that Remeikis presents is the effect that Howard has had on subsequent Labor governments, and in particular the present one.
This publication is exceptionally relevant today considering the state of the Liberal Party in 2026. The 2019 election result delayed the inevitable decline of the Party as Australia as a nation changed. The Party not only failed to attract voters from the young, women, migrants, the environmentally aware, the LGBTQIA+ community and supporters many of its actions alienated them.
For those interested in how Australian economy and society has been shaped over the last few decades this book is an essential read.
Recently Howard has demonstrated that perennial problem of ex-PMs – relevancy deprivation. After the Bondi massacre the Liberal Party dragged him out to make the damning comment that it wasn’t guns but antisemitism that caused the massacre. He looked old and frail. The personification of a cranky old man.
Sadly I do not see any quality leadership in Australia or elsewhere in the world.
John Howard does not fit comfortably in this list. He is not a “bad” person, but rather a skilled politician with stamina and an ideology that is now part of many western democracies of today. Howard did to Australia what Ronald Reagen did to the US. Paul Keating famously said in 1996, "When you change the government, you change the country." John Howard's Coalition government sure did that.
Amy Remeikis runs a critical eye over the Howard Government with particular focus on the man himself. Remekis is highly critical of Howard but she is methodical and exact in her research and her opinions. For the reader who is supportive of Howard they will find the book’s tone confronting. Remeikis’s position is clear, and the analysis is unapologetically critical.
Remeikis covers all of Howard’s policies: taxation, health, education migration, privatisation, industrial relations, our relationship with the US.
A supplementary argument that Remeikis presents is the effect that Howard has had on subsequent Labor governments, and in particular the present one.
This publication is exceptionally relevant today considering the state of the Liberal Party in 2026. The 2019 election result delayed the inevitable decline of the Party as Australia as a nation changed. The Party not only failed to attract voters from the young, women, migrants, the environmentally aware, the LGBTQIA+ community and supporters many of its actions alienated them.
For those interested in how Australian economy and society has been shaped over the last few decades this book is an essential read.
Recently Howard has demonstrated that perennial problem of ex-PMs – relevancy deprivation. After the Bondi massacre the Liberal Party dragged him out to make the damning comment that it wasn’t guns but antisemitism that caused the massacre. He looked old and frail. The personification of a cranky old man.
Sadly I do not see any quality leadership in Australia or elsewhere in the world.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 66 reviews