Στο Σεξουαλικό Εγκέφαλο εξετάζονται οι μηχανισμοί του εγκεφάλου που δημιουργούν τη σεξουαλική συμμπεριφορά, ο ρόλος του εγκεφάλου στα ερωτικά συναισθήματα, τα στοιχεί που καθορίζουν το σεξουαλικό προσανατολισμό και γιατί ο άνθρωπος είναι ένα σεξουαλιο ζώο ακόμη οι διαφορές αυτών των μηχανισμών ανάμεσα στους α΄νδρες και στις γυναίκες, το πώς αναπτύσονται αυτές οι διαφορές και το ερώτημα τι καθορίζει το σεξουαλικό προσανατολισμό ενός ατόμου?-- γονίδια, προγεννητικά γεγονότα, οικογενειακό περιβάλλον ή πρώιμες σεξουαλικές εμπειρίες? Επίσης εξετάζεται η βιολογία της σεξουαλικής ανάπτυξης, η ταυτότητα φύλου, ο σεξουαλικός προσανατολισμός, οι βιολογικοί μηχανισμοί της σεξουαλικής συνομιλίας και οι μηχανισμοί που πιθανόν ενέχονται στο να γίνει ένα άτομο φυσιολογικό, γκέι ή αμφίφυλο.
Ο Σεξουαλικός Εγκέφαλος είναι ένα βιβλίο γραμμένο με μια αίσθηση χιούμορ, στο οποίο τεκμηριώνεται η άποψη ότι η σεξουαλική συμπεριφορά και τα ερωτικά συναισήματα του ανθρώπου κατανοούνται καλύτερα με βάση την ανάπτυξη, τη δομή και τη λειτουργία κυκλωμάτων του εγκεφάλου που τα δημιουργούν.
... Το βιβλίο, γραμμένο με κομψότητα, ακόμη και με ευφύια, συνδιάζει τα πρόσφατα ευρήματα από την εξελικτική βιολογία, την ενδοκρινολογία, τη μοριακή γενετική και τη γνωστική ψυχολογία σε μια λαμπρή απολαυστική σύνθεση...
Dr. Simon LeVay is a writer and lecturer with a background in neuroscience. He is best known for his research on the brain and sexuality, but has also spent many years studying the visual system. He has written or co-authored several books on sexuality, and coauthored books on such diverse topics as earthquakes and volcanoes, extraterrestrial life, and Parkinson's disease. He has even written a novel. Dr. Simon LeVay lives in West Hollywood, California.
This was published fifteen years ago, and I read it ten years ago. It's by the scientist who did the study however long ago that found that gay men had differently sized hypothalymuses than straight men. This book is great - an argument for homosexuality's being nature, not nurture, using animal studies as support - the animal studies are fascinating.
This book, while interesting, was a bit dry and not quite as accessible as a pop science book ought to be. LeVay managed to keep it from sounding completely like a text book by dropping in a few quips here and there, but on the whole this book wasn't as enjoyable a read as Queer Science, his later book that discussed the history of scientific inquiry into homosexuality. Regardless, this book was quite interesting and is a must read for those with an interest in the subject, though I would suggest that possessing at least a basic familiarity with brain physiology and genetics will keep a reader from floundering on the modest amount of technical lingo.
Clear writing on a muddy subject, modest in claims, and powerful in its commitment to question simple theories. I need to follow up on this research to learn how much further it’s advanced, but the big takeaway is an education on how the main tools of sexuality - external genitalia, internal genitalia, and various neighborhoods of the brain - each develop at different times, by different means, under varying conditions. Hence you can send a thousand people down the same salad bar, and end up with a thousand different salads. Life is rich and amazing.
It really pisses me off when someone documents a lot of good research such as contained in this book, and yet presents it with an extremely unscientific and ideologically biased interpretation. That's what you get in this book.
Interesting book to those with a medical background but probably dry as heck to others. LeVay discusses studies looking at the effects of hormones on the differentiation if the body during pregnancy and after birth as well as later in life. He also discusses scientific examinations of possible differences that could explanation the differences between gay and straight individuals, looking at the size of brain structures as well as theorizing on the hormonal influences versus environmental factors. I found it interesting but doubt would be to most readers.
My ratings of books on Goodreads are solely a crude ranking of their utility to me, and not an evaluation of literary merit, entertainment value, social importance, humor, insightfulness, scientific accuracy, creative vigor, suspensefulness of plot, depth of characters, vitality of theme, excitement of climax, satisfaction of ending, or any other combination of dimensions of value which we are expected to boil down through some fabulous alchemy into a single digit.