Thanks to Netgalley & Putnam for the ARC!
Lizzie Buehler’s The Obsessed is a book that is too real for its own good, so measured in its depiction of lived experience that it fails to have much of a perspective.
Over the past few years, there’s been a glut of autofiction that overestimates the relevance of academia. If I misinterpret a literary theorist, I won't have to have an opinion. The average reader won't know any better. Even so, I often enjoy how authors slyly interrogate the absurdity of the institution and their place in it, using novelistic form to heighten every competing voice. Whether The Obsessed truly fits the genre is up for debate, but its passive protagonist sounds a whole lot like Lizzie Buehler: She attends an Ivy League. She studies comparative lit. She’s a translator. That last point in particular feels crucial to making sense of why this book doesn’t click.
Broadly speaking, translations favor word-for-word literalism or more contextualized interpretation, and The Obsessed feels defined by the former. While this is original work, it feels so committed to “fact” that it loses any sense of truth. It’s just a bunch of events happening to someone who doesn't have the interiority to engage with them. Every time the narrator invokes an academic touchstone like Wittgenstein or Byung-Chul Han, it’s with the performative familiarity of a graduate student. The problem with the novel being in first person is that it becomes almost impossible to parse whether Astrid is a boring character or Buehler is a boring writer. If there was more tonal definition, it might feel like there’s some substance behind the superficiality, but Buehler’s writing is detached to the point of apathy. Without a sense of authorial opinion, the book’s title feels ironic, but there’s no evidence of reflection that would motivate irony.
I mean, the book’s culminating revelation is itself a cliché: “I was more in love with my narratives about *character names* than with the people themselves.”
Overall, The Obsessed is a frustrating read because there are moments where it feels like Buehler is capable of more. There’s a character referred to only as “MIT Boy,” and across a series of text exchanges and a short story, his voice emerges with such a gratingly wooden specificity that one wonders why the other characters don’t get the same treatment. They need the same level of caricature to make sense on the page. It feels equally telling and unfortunate that the only other interesting conversation—between the protagonist and her favorite author—is lifted almost wholesale from an email that Elif Batuman sent to Lizzie Buehler. The only moment of genuine perspective in the book essentially occurs outside of it.
It’s hard to say whether the novel’s issue is in depicting mundanity or failing to interpret it, but either way, there’s not really enough here to pique one’s interest. Early in the story, the protagonist suggests that there are too many unnecessary books in the world. The Obsessed is a regrettably compelling argument in her favor.