From the NBC News correspondent and New York Times bestselling author of Separated, a gripping and revelatory account of the devastating 2025 Los Angeles fires, which he covered on the ground as an LA native.
On the morning of January 7, 2025, a message pinged the phone of Jacob Soboroff, a national correspondent for NBC News. “Big Palisades fire. We are evacuating,” his brother texted within minutes of the blaze engulfing the hillside behind the home where he and his pregnant wife were living. “Really bad.” An attached photo showed a huge black plume rising from behind the house, an umbrella of smoke towering over everything they owned. Jacob rushed to the office of the bureau chief.
“I should go. I grew up in the Palisades.”
Soon he was on the front line of the Palisades fire—his first live report of what would turn out to be weeks covering unimaginable destruction, from the Palisades to Altadena. In the days to come, Soboroff appeared across the networks of NBC News as Los Angeles was ablaze, met with displaced residents and workers, and pressed Governor Gavin Newsom in an interview on Meet the Press. But no story Soboroff has covered at home or abroad—the trauma of family separation at the border, the displacement of the war in Ukraine, the collapse of order in Haiti—could have prepared him for reporting live as the hallmarks of his childhood were engulfed in flames around him while his hometown burned to the ground.
But for Soboroff, questions remained after the fires were what had he just witnessed? How could it have happened? Is it inevitable something like it will happen again? This set Soboroff off on months of reporting – with firefighters, fire victims, political leaders, academics, earth scientists, wildlife biologists, meteorologists and more – that made him keenly aware of how the misfortune of seeing his past carbonize was also a form of time travel into the dystopian world his children will inhabit. This is because the 2025 LA fires were not an isolated tragedy, but rather they are a harbinger--"the fire of the future," in the words of one senior emergency-management official.
Firestorm is the story of the costliest natural disaster in American history, the people it affected and the deeply personal connection to one journalist covering it. It is a love letter to Los Angeles, a yearning to understand the fires, and why America’s new age of disaster we are living through portends that – without a reckoning of how Los Angeles burned – there is more yet, and worse, to come.
I was mixed here. This book has a bit of an identity crisis. Is it memoir or reporting? It’s at its best as memoir. Less clear when it’s reporting. I think it needed more time and stronger editorial pass to pull it all together. Soboroffs emotion, love of LA, and curiosity about people all come through super well. The politics stuff is less focused.
While the book was interesting in a reporting on the ground way, the political commentary and the way the author glorified Newsome and Biden and took every opportunity to make a diss at Trump, felt extremely out of place if the goal of the book was to tell about the events of the few days he was on the ground. I could tell what the tone of the book would be when the author introduced himself as an MSNBC reporter and told about his previous book (gag). Anyway, it’s clear this book was commissioned to begin the propagandized history to be recorded of the fires in California in 2025.
The book is mostly a personal memoir of the Pacific Palisade fires of January 2025. It was absolutely devastating as such, but also shows how the new age of misinformation made things worse. The book gets an extra star for shedding a light on this and the other devastations for environmental policies and on human safety caused by the Trump administration.
January 2025 saw something like fourteen wildfires in total in the state of California. Some of these fires burned for approximately thirty days! Two of the fires were talked about more than the others, the Eaton Fire and the Palisades Fire. The destruction and devastation caused by these fires ranks high on the list of the most destructive fires that California has ever seen. One of the fires was deliberately set by an arsonist, and subsequent fires were a result of rekindling of that fire with contributing factors like drought and the Santa Ana Winds.
These fires raised many questions about the need for improved infrastructure and resources and also raised questions about the competency of the federal government. DT is known for his late-night rants on social media where he screams in caps lock about things he has no idea about. His echo chamber of followers repost and repeat, all of them talking out the side of their necks and trying their best to call everyone names and create conspiracy theories. The lack of useful federal government plans, assistance, and input is alarming. In recent months, it has grown more alarming. There were a lot of allegations out about the fighting of these fires (of which the "leaders" of this country know nothing about), the water (which simply could not keep up with the amount of things burning and spraying into hurricane force winds), the fire engines (which did need routine maintenance and upgrades), the grounding of air support (hurricane force winds) and other things. Someone who is not a follower of a cult or invested in a political party can use their common sense to see that there were certainly issues and challenges in fighting fourteen fires for a month straight. Not everything is a conspiracy. People really need to cut the shit. People lost homes, businesses, and lives.
I forgot that I pre-ordered this book on Audible. I got the notification today and listened to it while I was at work. It was about a six hour long listen. The narration was good. The content was a mixture of enthralling, factual, educational, and enraging. I had just finished a book about Qanon this morning that I will be reviewing next, and I have to say the misinformation and disinformation spewed forth by DT and his minions was more tiresome than usual. I found some of his comments especially grating and offensive, as I grew up in a family of firemen and first responders. (It is equally grating that they support this man and have subscribed to this conspiratorial way of thinking when this group shits on their profession, but I DIGRESS.) I thought the author of this book was well spoken and I appreciated the reporting of facts instead of heading down a conspiracy rabbit hole.
This is a well written and absorbing book about the horrific fires that devastated Los Angeles in January 2025. Jacob Soboroff was an NBC/MSNBC correspondent who grew up in the Pacific Palisades area of Los Angeles. (He’s currently with MS NOW) I remember watching his compelling reports as the fires started and spread. He absolutely humanized what was happening to the city he loved. This is also the story of the fire departments that were tasked with the Herculean and Sisyphean job of fighting and containing these fires, how the gale force winds spread them and the devastation they caused.
The epilogue is a must read (as is the whole book) as it recounts the political ramifications of trying to get aid in the new DJT era, the environmental causes of the fires and how current policies are impacting prevention and recovery: from dismantling government agencies that are tasked with monitoring and providing aid to areas hit by environmental disasters to the mass deportation of day laborers who are vital to the cleanup and rebuilding of Los Angeles. (Whew! That was one long sentence!)
There is an interesting story in the book of how Stephen Miller’s wife Katie reached out to Jacob to ask him to check on SM’s parents’ home to see if it was still there (like he didn’t have enough to do!) Jacob did, reported back to her along with photos, and then she ghosted him. Later, KM posted on social media her skepticism that the fires were caused y climate change. Not helpful, but so on brand for the Millers.
I strongly recommend that you follow Jacob Soboroff on IG, where you can see videos of the reporting he did live during the fires. At one point in the book he said he was doing all this with a migraine, and if you are a migraine sufferer, you can appreciate how much harder this made his job and how heroic this was.
When Firestorm was first announced, it promised something rare: a major disaster narrative written by someone who lived it, who reported it in real time, and who came of age in the very place that burned. Jacob Soboroff’s dual vantage point — as both an experienced journalist and a native Angeleno — theoretically positioned him to craft a powerful and intimate document of the Great Los Angeles Fires of January 2025. Unfortunately, over the course of just under 300 pages, the book’s central tension — its struggle between reportage and personal narrative — never resolves, leaving Firestorm with an unsettling and unfulfilling identity crisis.
At its core, Firestorm is an account of the Palisades and Eaton fires, two conflagrations that consumed tens of thousands of acres, destroyed thousands of homes, and displaced entire communities. Soboroff places readers on the ground from the start, recounting the moment he first learned of the blaze through his brother’s text and immediately pivoting from his regular reporting to cover one of the worst domestic fires in modern California history firsthand.
In its strongest moments, Soboroff’s book conveys the chaos, fear, and human scale of the disaster in vivid terms. He relives the surreal experience of watching his own childhood neighborhood — even the house he was born in — succumb to flame, and bridges that with the experiences of firefighters, evacuated residents, and emergency officials in a way that only someone present in the moment could. His depictions are grounded in concrete detail, and readers feel the anxiety of crumbling infrastructure and wind-driven fire as if watching from the burning hillside itself.
Yet it is precisely this mix — deeply personal experience next to moment-by-moment journalist’s workflow — that creates the book’s central problem. Firestorm never quite decides what it wants to be.
Is it a piece of serious investigative writing about climate-driven disaster and systemic failure? Not really. Despite threads that touch on factors like the federal disaster response, misinformation in political discourse, and long-term wildfire projections, these elements are often superficial, underanalyzed, or treated as secondary to the narrative’s immediate events. Large structural questions — about climate change, land policy, infrastructure resilience, and socioeconomic inequities — are introduced but rarely followed with the depth or context necessary to make the book substantively insightful.
Is it a memoir about Soboroff’s personal experience of reporting and loss? Again, only in fragments. The moments of self-reflection are powerful — the loss of place, the collision between childhood memory and adult reality — but they are scattered and sometimes overwhelmed by procedural reporting: where he drove, which media outlets he appeared on, and snippets of his messages during live coverage. This oscillation means the emotional narrative never quite deepens into the sustained introspection that defines strong memoir.
Indie reviewers and readers have echoed this sense of indecision. Many note that the book feels like a long magazine article expanded into a book instead of a fully realized standalone work. They cite the presence of verbatim transcripts of on-air reports and group chats — interesting in the moment, but not sufficient to support a standalone narrative of 270+ pages — as padding that distracts from deeper thematic threads.
As one Goodreads reader put it, “It was unclear whether this was intended as memoir or reportage… and the editorial choices failed to make either feel fully realized.” Others mention that the book seems too short — not enough to provide the comprehensive analysis one expects from disaster literature, and yet too long for a memoir that largely retraces familiar emotional territory.
The result is a narrative that feels on the fence, like a book torn between ambition and form. Had Soboroff committed to one of those poles — rigorous investigative climate reporting rooted in broader systems, or a more intimate memoir free from the constraints of disaster chronology — Firestorm might have been a truly compelling work. Instead, it circles the territory of both without fully inhabiting either.
That said, the book does have merits. Soboroff’s voice is earnest and affecting, and his firsthand presence lends an immediacy that many disaster books can lack. For readers who lived through the January 2025 fires or who follow Soboroff’s reporting, there’s significant emotional resonance here. But for readers seeking profound insight into wildfire science, policy implications, or a fully formed personal journey, Firestorm often feels too thin or too diffused to satisfy.
In the end, Firestorm is neither a definitive account of America’s New Age of Disaster nor a deeply introspective memoir. It sits on the fence between journalism and personal narrative — and because of that, it’s a compelling but ultimately incomplete portrait of one of the most devastating wildfires in recent memory.
The book goes through the events of the 2025 LA fires, and is framed around the view point of a reporter from the community being burnt down, along with some other side povs (e.g., firemen, a couple who happened to be out of town during the events, and the governor).
The story does bounce around a lot between being a third person overview of the events and then a zoom in of the actions and emotions of a single individual. It also ends somewhat abruptly and at points it did get a bit repetitive, but overall it was a great listen.
I think it is also a book that might be difficult in the beginning for people not from CA to understand some of the roads or towns that aren’t well known to those in other parts of the country (or world). Which is ofc classic Californian behavior. But the ending is very well written. It presents a robust argument that this event is a templete for future natural disasters in the next few decades (unless we do something, talk to you Donny J Dipshit). Also on that note, this book really paints G. Newsom in a positive light and makes D. Trump and E. Musk look like idiots/jackasses….which checks out.
Audiobook: slow start for someone that doesn’t understand the local geography. Picked up nicely. Very informative account of the fire and aftermath from a reporter on the ground. Mostly reporting but with a personal touch?
This book has so much potential, but it is clear it was rushed through the publication process to release it at the one year anniversary of the devastating fires. It would have benefited from at least one more round of drafting/editing. As is, I am not sure what the book is supposed to be. Is it a memoir? Is it reporting? I think it shines in parts that read more like a memoir. The author’s love for his hometown is evident and I would have enjoyed this more if he stayed in that space.
A journalistic recounting of the disastrous Palisades and Altadena fires of 2025 that strings together the news events from a variety of sources during the 24 days of the conflagration.
I appreciate the chronological approach to the disaster but didn't connect with this story as much as Alastair Gee and Dan Aguiano's Fire in Paradise despite the fact these fires (particularly the Eaton fire) occurred in my beloved San Gabriel Valley.
I was not impressed. Although the info about the fires was good, you have read page after page of the author puffing up his reporting of the fires and all the important people he knows. This book was not a book about the fires. It is a book about a reporter, who just happens to report on the fires.
I think this book may have been written too soon to fulfill its promise.
I had hoped for a book that begins to tackle the many contributors to this disaster - climate change, development patterns & infrastructure in fire-prone areas, insurance, disaster readiness & relief, and yes, even water policy in Southern California. To be fair, the author makes brief mention to all of these topics, and they are topics that are nuanced and expansive - but that is exactly why it would have taken longer than a few months to do them any justice.
What this book is instead is a drawn out account the author’s movements and reporting while covering the fires. When I say drawn out, I mean full verbatim transcripts of his on-air coverage, texts in various group chats, which roads he took to get places, and on and on. Most of it felt like if you asked a student to double or triple the word count on what is otherwise a compelling retelling of reporting during a disaster.
He does weave accounts from a handful of firefighters, residents, business owners, and his own experience as someone that grew up in the Palisades- but even these failed to capture the full human emotional impact that I know the author experienced and was trying to convey, and that I’ve seen in other coverage. If he had made telling these human stories the focus of the book rather than a supplement to a blow-by-blow of his reporting movements, I think it would have had a greater impact.
As a native Angeleno, I was riveted to this book as I was riveted to the television last January, watching my beloved city burn down. Jacob Soboroff is a reporter for NBC News who was assigned to report on the fires in Los Angeles. In addition, he grew up in Pacific Palisades, and watching and reporting on the incineration of his childhood home, neighborhood, and memories made his reporting raw and emotional, with a lot of information about people, places, and history that others without his background could not have provided. This book provides both an encapsulation and expansion of that reporting, emotions and all, with a lot of additional information about the fires, people impacted by them, the science of fire management, and the politics of Los Angeles and the US that are inextricably linked to the response and narrative about the fire. I loved this book in part because like the author I was familiar with all the places he described and many of the people. I share his sadness at the destruction of our city and the issues that are impairing discovery of facts related to the fire’s outbreak and the rebuilding effort. This book is an excellent work of journalism and a memoir There is more to come, however, as the investigation into the fire’s causes continues, as does the rebuilding effort which currently appears to be hampered by the broken Los Angeles permitting and building process that officials promised to fix. I was hoping for some reporting on how Rick Caruso saved portions of Palisades Village and how the Getty Villa escaped the flames. I suspect both were due to private firefighting forces- another chapter on deployment of those types of resources would have been interesting, particularly as Soboroff did explore in part the ongoing story of Los Angeles as a contrast between rich and poor coexisting in what most of the time is paradise- until disaster strikes. Still a really great book that earns 5 stars from me because its topic is so personal.
Very informative regarding the tragic La fires but so much more from the politics of our country and the importance of science and resources needed to help prevent and manage such horrific disasters. This also shared the human element and the hope of those who lived there and lost their communities and the strength needed to rebuild..
So we have been on vacation and my very best friend and her college roommate were here. That roommate reported to the LA firestorm on loan from the US Forest Service on January 10 one year ago. She fought the fire and worked it with a team for 2 weeks. Then she was fired by the Trump administration in February 2025 after five years of service and after fighting fires for 7 seasons including college. This was the book she brought and shared. Her stories with this terrific book make tragedy real. If you have any doubt what happened and why I suggest you make time for this book.
Worthless, disappointing read. Narrow antidotal take on fire, very difficult to follow narrative. Add in climate change nonsense and anti-Trump screed. Paints Newsome as some heroic figure. Just odd, off kilter book.
I really enjoyed this book and learning about what happened but the political commentary felt unnecessary and lost credibility, as it felt like the author was trying really hard to glorify Newsome and discount Trump; it felt out of place and cheapened what would have been a more compelling memoir. The last couple chapters were the worst and there was no accountability for the political left when there were misses on both sides. Don't start with a Memoir and end with your political agenda.
What makes Firestorm compelling isn’t just its careful accounting of events, statistics, or the grim day-by-day progression, but the emotional clarity that underpins the reporting. Soboroff’s connection to Pacific Palisades - and the loss of his childhood home and community - gives the book a depth and gravity that elevates it beyond standard disaster journalism. The grief is present, but so is restraint, which makes the impact stronger.
Thank you to NetGalley and Mariner Books for the ARC.
this book was confused as to what it wanted to be. is it supposed to be a memoir or a story about the LA fires? in the end it's neither, a lot of the memoir is verbatim retellings of what the reporter said on air. it just felt like filler.
Choked up more than once devouring this exceptional first-person and reported narrative about the devastating LA fires. Jacob Soboroff grew up in Pacific Palisades and his love for our shared home of Los Angeles is a deep and beautiful streak running through this propulsive book. A remarkable work. Highly recommend.
1.5 🌟 Essentially DNFed.. had the epilogue left. It was hard to stay interested because I couldn’t decide what the tone was going for. I was hoping more behind the scenes of the fire. Near the end when it turned political, I cringed to keep listening and eventually had to call it quits.
I’ve read a lot of books about various disasters, including hurricanes, tornados, tsunamis, and the paradise fire, so maybe that is why I started this book a little confused as to why he kept mentioning himself, his homes, his neighborhood, his synagogue. It didn’t feel like it fit. But as the book went on it was clear it was more of a telling of his own experience with the fire and the reporting on it than a timeline and telling of the details and the events of the fire. It was still an interesting read and worth picking up, but I guess I was expecting more of fire book and less of a memoir.
Thanks to Netgalley and Mariner Books for sharing this ARC. I seem to have a fascination with fire stories, whether it’s a voyeuristic trait I have or general interest in natural disasters, I’m not sure, but I’ve read quite a few similarly themed books. Given that, this upcoming book on the 2025 California fires had something special. Beyond just a recitation of the facts and numbers and play by play of how the days unfolded, there was a true heart to the author’s approach. Because he is from Pacific Palisades, the real emotion of losing his childhood home and town really came through. I found myself choked up with emotion at times and could easily imagine my own sadness and shock in a similar situation. So I found this a cut above the usual, and would recommend it.
Despite many predictions to the contrary, Los Angeles enjoyed a series of rainstorms in the latter part of 2025. As of February 2026, all of Southern California has been de-listed as areas of concern on the United States drought monitor. For a moment, earlier in the year, all of California was likewise for the first time for the better part of this century.
And a lot of us thought about just how different things had been at the very beginning of 2025 when we all lived through some of the most harrowing days in the history of Los Angeles.
For Jacob Soboroff, it was not just work; it was very personal, to which he bears witness in Firestorm: The Great Los Angeles Fires and America’s New Age of Disaster (galley received as part of early review program). He grew up and his family still lived in Pacific Palisades. He frequented many of the businesses in Altadena.
And, working for NBC News, he would end up reporting on the scene as his old neighborhood was completely devastated by the Palisades Fire.
This work represents the author’s memoir of the experience of the two weeks in January in which the Palisades Fire and the Eaton fire, among a few other fires, sparked and raged, reducing significant portions of Pacific Palisades and Altadena to ash. The author simultaneously traces the stories of his own travels and news reporting; President Biden’s presence and emergency disaster declaration; Governor Gavin Newsom’s presence and responses; and President-elect Trump’s social media posts throughout the whole affair. The author, having interviewed firefighters and home and business owners, interspersed their stories into the narrative at appropriate points as well.
This was a surreal read for me since I lived in Los Angeles during the fires. I could see them on the horizon and even drove past the Palisades Fire while traveling on Interstate 405 one day. I, personally, did not lose anything in the fires, but I have friends and know of others who lost everything. There was a heaviness over the whole city during that time. I have read a few books in this genre, but it is a very different experience to read about one that was not only something you heard about on the news.
The author well points out how climate change will make these kinds of things more likely and more difficult over time, and warns about how the current administration’s shifts in policy will not well meet this moment. You may not live in Los Angeles, and wildfire may seem like a remote danger for you. But something else might well happen far closer than would make you comfortable, and what would you hope the government and nonprofits would be prepared and ready to do when that moment comes?
Having grown up in SoCal in one of the small foothill cities mentioned in this book but not affected by these fires, I found the subject matter of these devastating fires most interesting. Having left not only SoCal but the United States 32 years ago (thank god) I watched coverage of the conflagrations over the course of the disaster. I saw the cars abandoned in the Palisades being pushed out of the way by bulldozers so that first responders could get in. I heard interviews with people desperate for information about their homes because for days, weeks even, they were not allowed to return. So something that was a big question for me is why the press was allowed to roam free in the area, right into neighbourhoods with buildings on fire? The author was only one reporter but how many others like him were driving around looking for that dramatic backdrop or photo-op, taking selfies or videos to send to friends and family members while checking on their homes? Seems to me that staging areas should be set up for the press to broadcast from and otherwise prevent them from randomly cruising around potentially interfering with emergency crews! There were a lot of take-aways from this book but that was a BIG one. The author's knowledge of the area affected by the Palisades fire brought the events a personal aspect that was compelling but there were a number of unnecessary reputations, possibly due to lack of editing or the author not realizing it was redundant. #1… mentioning that his sister-in-law was pregnant at the time was irrelevant the first time but I lost how many times it was mentioned or the earlier or subsequent births of family members. #2…Mentioning and/or comparing other fires was great information but people diving into the Pacific in Lahaina on Maui was mentioned at least three times. These were small annoyances and overall the content was detailed and informative. Since I was a child growing up in the last house on a street at the base of the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains and riding horseback up into those hills, the area has become a sea of multi-million dollar homes spreading farther and farther up into the canyons creating more and more congestion in the "wildland-urban interface". For years I have said that the population growth and sprawl of development in previously wild areas is a recipe for disaster. It seems no place is safe in the Southland anymore which makes me doubly glad that I no longer need to worry about that. Having said that, fires, even highly destructive urban ones are on the rise in places where the term "wildfire" was never even part of the regional vocabulary. 3½ stars from me.
As someone who deeply loves California, I looked forward to this book about the January 2025 Los Angeles Fires. I no longer live there, but my professional and personal lives are still tied to the Golden State.
This book was not a disappointment. Jacob Soboroff grew up in Los Angeles—specifically the Pacific Palisades community, and he knows the city very well. To watch his hometown burn down while having to report on it clearly took a large amount of fortitude and professionalism. He sees how government—local, state, and federal—helped and failed its constituents simultaneously, and reports on it with a gimlet eye. While the bulk of his, and the nation’s, coverage is about the affluent Pacific Palisades community, he does not ignore the diverse working-class community of Altadena.
It’s hard to know what this book was intended to be—an elegy for a lost home? A love letter to the LAFD? An expose on the fecklessness and cruelty of the current administration? A warning about what future disasters will look like? In some ways, it’s all of these. The epilogue, which is in some ways the best part of the book, is clear that we’ve entered a “New Age of Disaster” here in the United States.
But, it really isn’t all that new. We’ve been well aware of the impact that climate change, our crumbling infrastructure, the inequality that’s baked into American life, and misinformation has had on our natural disasters for some time. Twenty years before, Hurricane Katrina exposed this self-same issue. If anything, what we saw in Los Angeles County simply has been made worse, and even worse still by the poor leadership of our current administration.
While the book is captivating and clearly well-written, it may have benefitted from some more time—either in editing or writing. My understanding is that release on or around the first anniversary of the fires was a top priority. As a result, it ends somewhat abruptly, particularly in light of the fact that the first half of the book is written in almost granular detail. It's a quick read, in part because Soboroff wrote a captivating book. I had to take breaks some times because it was emotionally hard to read.
It's early days yet in 2026, but this should be on the short list of Best Books of the Year.
Firestorm is Jacob Soboroff’s deeply personal attempt to make sense of the January 2025 Palisades and Eaton Fires - a disaster that scorched more than 50,000 acres in California. The scale of the devastation is hard to wrap your mind around, and Soboroff approaches it not only as a journalist, but as someone whose own family was forced to flee as flames overtook the neighborhood he grew up in.
That dual role, journalist and hometown witness, is Firestorm's most persistent flaw.
Soboroff’s writing is compelling. His recounting of the 100 mile per hour Santa Ana winds, the dry air turning whole communities into kindling, and the pace at which emergency response teams were overwhelmed is a page turner. But the memoir‑forward approach can also overshadow the story he’s trying to tell.
At times, I was disoriented by his recounts of his family group chats, or what he posted on Instagram and why he captioned them the way that he did. While undeniably human moments, it often felt more like a story about him than the community whose homes and livelihoods were reduced to ash. In a disaster of this magnitude, the focus can feel narrower than maybe it ought to be.
Another element that may enrage you is the rhetoric and misinformation of the incoming administration. The book quotes several "Truth" Social posts in full, which are historically useful but also incredibly frustrating to revisit - especially as the man who's "truthing" at all hours of the night is so hell-bent on spreading only lies and hate.
You don't hear me say this often, but the book's epilogue was its best part. It’s where Soboroff leans most fully into journalism rather than memoir, pulling together interviews with scientists, firefighters, policymakers, and residents to ask what these fires mean for Los Angeles’s future.
A powerful but imperfect account of one of the most catastrophic weather events of our times.