I’ve chosen not to review this with any particular star amount on Goodreads because the last thing I would ever want to do is discourage a new author, and I don’t believe this is deserving of a negative rating. I would also like to express that I did not go into this book with the intention of disliking it. I genuinely found the premise interesting. Many people are already losing their sense of self due to AI and I was intrigued by the idea of a book that helps people regain their humanity and remember what makes them so incredible in the first place.
Unfortunately, I did not agree with much of the book. Despite being called ‘Human Again’, there is a great deal of erasure of soul. The author mentions that AI cannot think, and there are sections speaking about the importance of human experiences – e.g travel, taste, and our ‘weirdness’ (in the author’s words) – but this sentiment does not seem consistent throughout the book and is always spoiled by mentions of how you can use these experiences to help refine AI’s suggestions. This continues nearing the end of the book also, as the author suggests that improving what AI gives you takes skill and does not ‘eliminate effort’. This, to me, misses the entire point of why human experiences are as valuable as they are: discovery. We are constantly learning new things about ourselves and the way in which we think, every time we try. I truly do not see why someone would want to refine a machine’s ideas as opposed to creating something of their own and growing from it. We leave so much of ourselves in our work and in what we do. I have rewritten several sentences in this review in order to express myself better, and I’ve learned how I use certain words and phrases in doing so. Everything I have ever read, every conversation I have ever had, has helped shape my opinions and ideas. If I gave an AI a list of my thoughts, it would be able to write this review in a few short seconds, but it would ultimately change the heart of those thoughts in the process. I could read through what AI has given me and add personal touches, but it would never be enough. Every word I am choosing is intentional, whether I realise it or not. AI cannot be shaped by its experiences because it doesn’t have them. It can only take from what is publicly available online, which I do consider to be plagiarism, despite what the writer may think. More than that, if an AI can immediately spit out the answers, what is the point in doing anything at all? What is the point of being alive if not to learn and grow and discover new information and ideas you hadn’t previously considered, over time? There is something distinctly human about finding yourself in a confusing and difficult world. We are bettering ourselves every day just by being conscious and having unique thoughts, and that is wonderful.
At multiple points throughout the book, the author suggests the use of AI to analyse movements, particularly in reference to sports or other physical activities. One example given is using AI to analyse golf swings so that the AI can correct your movements so that you don’t have to try as much or as many times to get it right. To me, this ignores what makes success feel so rewarding – the trying, the failing, the figuring things out for yourself. I don’t want a robot to tell me exactly how to make a perfect golf swing; I want to keep attempting until I actually find the best angle and the right amount of pressure, because that is what will make me feel pride in my abilities. I don’t want a soulless piece of technology directing my body when it comes to any kind of sport because perfection is not passion, and passion is what makes an activity worth it. I think the best example I can give you is the film, ‘The Life of Chuck’. For those who haven’t watched the movie, there is a scene in which Chuck - played by Tom Hiddleston - begins dancing to a drum beat on his way to work. Yes, an AI could have analysed Tom Hiddleston’s movements and told him how to make them look absolutely flawless. But the reason that scene is so incredible is because it’s not perfect. It’s spontaneous and beautiful and real, and an AI cannot make that happen. It is pure devotion and effort. It is feeling so motivated to create something special that Tom Hiddleston quite literally burned holes in his shoes due to dancing. It is humanity, plain and simple.
The suggested AI uses also get quite concerning at points. For example, the author outlines how AI can be used in the context of therapy to generate personalised dialogues and scenarios. This is a serious privacy concern, and I truly do not understand why this is framed as a benefit of AI. Patient details are confidential and an AI should not have access to them. There have already been cases of AIs suggesting methods of self-harm and suicide to those who have opened up to it, and this is not something to be taken lightly. AI has caused people to lose touch with reality. It has groomed them into believing impossible ideas, because an AI is trained to tell you exactly what you want to hear. The author highlights that interactions with AI can leave individuals with a feeling of self-satisfaction, and that is exactly why AI can be so dangerous. It will not prioritise your safety over your ego. AI should not be used in therapy. AI should also not be used as a friend, lest you want to exist in an echo chamber.
The author describes using AI for small tasks as being akin to using electricity for a desk lamp and nothing else. Based on everything outlined in this book, I’m inclined to disagree. Using AI for something very small – like to find synonyms, a use the writer admits to – seems to be the equivalent of giving in to the temptation to smoke a cigarette for the first time. Once you’ve had a taste, you start to use AI for more and more tasks that it doesn’t need to be used for. It’s like taking another and another cigarette until you’re up to smoking a full pack a day. Yet that isn’t quite enough for you now that you know how much it helps. You start to use AI for bigger tasks and you stop working hard and stop thinking for yourself. Suddenly, you’re addicted. AI being used to this extent is harmful to the individual and harmful to the environment. It is not a light in the darkness; it is a fire that can do nothing but consume.
The future outlined in ‘Human Again’ is incredibly bleak, and it is one I refuse to accept. Resistance to AI is not, as the author claims, self-sabotage. AI may have uses in the field of medicine (which is briefly referenced nearing the book’s conclusion), but its presence in regular life is questionable at the very best. Ultimately, the way we can maintain our humanity in future is not by embracing AI. Maintaining humanity is achieved by choosing to keep discovering even when you’re told there’s nothing left to. Maintaining humanity is choosing to keep doing, because every activity is a lesson and a way to remind yourself that you’re doing something incredible. You’re responding to that email you’ve been putting off for ages instead of asking a robot to write it for you, because you know you’ll be proud of yourself for getting through it. You’re reading over that long research article instead of asking an AI to summarise it because you know that every word of it is valuable, and you know you’ll end up finding an interesting idea you hadn’t thought about along the way. You’re putting in the effort to go and search for a damn thesaurus so you can read and remember the synonyms instead of just copying and pasting an AI response. This is what living is, and it’s the hardest and most rewarding thing you can ever do.
Thank you for reading my review.