What do you think?
Rate this book


448 pages, Hardcover
First published March 7, 2026
Wolves, bears, the wild beasts of all kinds: those that frighten us, thrill us, go bump in the night. It's what's missing, they say, from the tight-leashed land: those lamplight eyes in the dark.
Without them, without that element of fear, however faint or unformed, our relationship with the land is incomplete.
'If wildlife is removed,' the environmental historian Roderick Nash has argued, 'although everything else remains visibly the same, the intensity of the sense of wilderness is diminished!’
In other words: the fear is a part of it.
all of which is to say: the wilderness cannot be mapped, but maps, have, nevertheless, been drawn.as she did in her fantsastic islands of abandonment, scottish writer cal flyn once more blends exquisite prose, a patient and unyielding curiosity, and a poet-philosopher's open-minded perspective to less-trod landscapes. this time visiting wilderness areas all around the globe (desert, jungle, mountain, forest, antarctic, oceanic, et al.), flyn examines different conceptions of what wilderness itself even means and the ways in which they currently exist in some of the world's remotest places. the savage landscape is utterly engrossing and flyn an amazing, thoughtful guide to the sublimity and wonder of nature, as well as the compelling questions around stewardship, conservation, and ever-encroaching rapacity.
true savages don't come dressed in skins or bearing spears. they wear fatigues, dress uniforms, blazers, dinner jackets. they carry briefcases, request progress reports, draw up plans of attack. they walk among us. in their inability to recognise the humanity of others, they reveal how their own must be lacking.
Wolves, bears, the wild beasts of all kinds: those that frighten us, thrill us, go bump in the night. It's what's missing, they say, from the tight-leashed land: those lamplight eyes in the dark.
Without them, without that element of fear, however faint or unformed, our relationship with the land is incomplete.
'If wildlife is removed,' the environmental historian Roderick Nash has argued, 'although everything else remains visibly the same, the intensity of the sense of wilderness is diminished!’
In other words: the fear is a part of it.