What do you think?
Rate this book
Wired Differently: A psychological profile written by its subject
82 pages, Paperback
Published October 28, 2025
4 people are currently reading
48 people want to read
About the author
Anonymous
791k books3,395 followersBooks can be attributed to "Anonymous" for several reasons:
* They are officially published under that name
* They are traditional stories not attributed to a specific author
* They are religious texts not generally attributed to a specific author
Books whose authorship is merely uncertain should be attributed to Unknown.
See also: Anonymous
* They are officially published under that name
* They are traditional stories not attributed to a specific author
* They are religious texts not generally attributed to a specific author
Books whose authorship is merely uncertain should be attributed to Unknown.
See also: Anonymous
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
January 20, 2026
I find it hard to judge diary as any other book. Cause it’s personal, it wasn’t meant to be shared (in most cases). Just like with Sylvia Plath. But this one is kind of a diary but its author writes it with full and well knowledge that it’ll get published, that’s the intention, for it to get published. And if it wasn’t meant to be, I wouldn’t have judged the way the sentences and paragraphs are structured. And it’s bad. Waaayy too many paragraphs. You don’t need to start a sentence in a new paragraph when it’s about what you’ve just wrote, it just falsely elongates the book (along with big font) but what do I know. I haven’t published any books, maybe that’s just because of the editor, publisher etc.
It is interesting as it is although it contains an enormous amount of banality. Still, it was a quick, easy and pleasant read. BUT: the author says they were diagnosed. When? At what point in life? What age approximately? In the first part of the book we learn that others didn’t find anything strange/different/something raising an alarm in their behavior. Then why did you get diagnosed? What pushed you to go to someone who could and did diagnose you? What those conversations with said person were like? All those little stories we are given are fine, but I’d say they’re lacking something.
‘They’re [texts on antisocial personality disorder] always written about people like me, never by people like me’. People who wrote said texts studied people with the disorder, did you study yourself? Not just as ‘shallow’ as self-reflecting but detaching yourself FROM yourself and studying yourself detached. I guess there’s no wrong or right way to write a book like that. But putting ‘a psychological profile written by its subject’ is a little too far fetched.
Definitely not what I’ve expected this book to be. I think it’d be interesting if they added their standpoint from the conversations that lead to the diagnosis. Of this diagnosis we now as little as nothing except that it was bestowed. How one gets diagnosed? As a result of conversations with therapist, is one way. If that was the case here: why not also include your view of those conversations and compare them with the standpoint of the therapist? If you were the patient you are granted the full medical documentation from each and every one of the visits at wish. Does a documentation like that include the notes that a therapist makes during session? On that matter I know far too little, but can only wonder and imagine. And the book is anonymous, it wouldn’t trace back to you, or maybe sharing something like that would strip one too many masks?
On the matter of anonymity: on one hand I get why the author would decide to publish it anonymously, on the other it seems like cowardice to me. Whether the book does good or bad, whether the book IS good or bad: ‘I wash my hands off of it’.
And why does it feel ‘generic’ in a way? Either the author spend too much time playing, ‘chatting’ with AI or they used the help of AI. Or maybe I’m mistaken.
It is interesting as it is although it contains an enormous amount of banality. Still, it was a quick, easy and pleasant read. BUT: the author says they were diagnosed. When? At what point in life? What age approximately? In the first part of the book we learn that others didn’t find anything strange/different/something raising an alarm in their behavior. Then why did you get diagnosed? What pushed you to go to someone who could and did diagnose you? What those conversations with said person were like? All those little stories we are given are fine, but I’d say they’re lacking something.
‘They’re [texts on antisocial personality disorder] always written about people like me, never by people like me’. People who wrote said texts studied people with the disorder, did you study yourself? Not just as ‘shallow’ as self-reflecting but detaching yourself FROM yourself and studying yourself detached. I guess there’s no wrong or right way to write a book like that. But putting ‘a psychological profile written by its subject’ is a little too far fetched.
Definitely not what I’ve expected this book to be. I think it’d be interesting if they added their standpoint from the conversations that lead to the diagnosis. Of this diagnosis we now as little as nothing except that it was bestowed. How one gets diagnosed? As a result of conversations with therapist, is one way. If that was the case here: why not also include your view of those conversations and compare them with the standpoint of the therapist? If you were the patient you are granted the full medical documentation from each and every one of the visits at wish. Does a documentation like that include the notes that a therapist makes during session? On that matter I know far too little, but can only wonder and imagine. And the book is anonymous, it wouldn’t trace back to you, or maybe sharing something like that would strip one too many masks?
On the matter of anonymity: on one hand I get why the author would decide to publish it anonymously, on the other it seems like cowardice to me. Whether the book does good or bad, whether the book IS good or bad: ‘I wash my hands off of it’.
And why does it feel ‘generic’ in a way? Either the author spend too much time playing, ‘chatting’ with AI or they used the help of AI. Or maybe I’m mistaken.
February 6, 2026
So… without any major spoilers, I think this just might be my new favourite non-fiction. It’s real, it’s raw and it clicks. It makes sense and my logical brain is firing synapses at an alarmingly pleasurable rate. I will keep this book and reread it as I grow. I’m curious to see how it shapes my life
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews