What do you think?
Rate this book
Remigration
A bold and meticulously argued blueprint for solving Europe’s immigration crisis, and how nations can reclaim their identity in an age of demographic upheaval.
Across Europe, decades of uncontrolled immigration from the developing world have plunged the continent into an era of political and cultural upheaval. The causes and consequences of this crisis have been endlessly debated—by voices on both the left and the right—but few have seriously considered what a politically realistic and morally defensible solution might look like.
In Remigration, Austrian writer and activist Martin Sellner presents a clear and unsparing account of how Europe reached this point and what must be done to recover its balance. Far from the caricature of an extremist right-wing demagogue, Sellner writes with restraint and analytic precision. He argues that the continent’s paralysis stems from a “politics of guilt” that made national self-preservation morally suspect and demographic self-replacement inevitable.
Sellner’s proposal, while controversial, is both humane and meticulously The voluntary return of large numbers of unassimilated migrants to their countries of origin, combined with a renaissance of civic confidence at home, opens the path forward for a healthy Europe. Drawing on existing European and international models, he outlines how such a policy could be implemented peacefully and pragmatically.
Remigration offers a warning from Europe’s experience and a mirror for America’s own immigration dilemmas. As the United States faces unprecedented border pressures, Sellner’s analysis raises the question that defines our What constitutes the contemporary nation, and do its people have a right to remain themselves?
Across Europe, decades of uncontrolled immigration from the developing world have plunged the continent into an era of political and cultural upheaval. The causes and consequences of this crisis have been endlessly debated—by voices on both the left and the right—but few have seriously considered what a politically realistic and morally defensible solution might look like.
In Remigration, Austrian writer and activist Martin Sellner presents a clear and unsparing account of how Europe reached this point and what must be done to recover its balance. Far from the caricature of an extremist right-wing demagogue, Sellner writes with restraint and analytic precision. He argues that the continent’s paralysis stems from a “politics of guilt” that made national self-preservation morally suspect and demographic self-replacement inevitable.
Sellner’s proposal, while controversial, is both humane and meticulously The voluntary return of large numbers of unassimilated migrants to their countries of origin, combined with a renaissance of civic confidence at home, opens the path forward for a healthy Europe. Drawing on existing European and international models, he outlines how such a policy could be implemented peacefully and pragmatically.
Remigration offers a warning from Europe’s experience and a mirror for America’s own immigration dilemmas. As the United States faces unprecedented border pressures, Sellner’s analysis raises the question that defines our What constitutes the contemporary nation, and do its people have a right to remain themselves?
168 pages, Kindle Edition
First published February 1, 2024
About the author
Martin Sellner
10 books22 followersMartin Sellner is an Austrian Neue Rechte activist, leader of the Identitäre Bewegung Österreichs (IBÖ, Identitarian Movement of Austria), and a part of the alt-right movement.
In 2008, he helped leading Austrian Neo-Nazis hinder liberal demonstrations and made pilgrimages to memorial services for Wehrmacht soldiers.
In March 2018, he was denied entry and deported from the United Kingdom.
In 2008, he helped leading Austrian Neo-Nazis hinder liberal demonstrations and made pilgrimages to memorial services for Wehrmacht soldiers.
In March 2018, he was denied entry and deported from the United Kingdom.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 9 of 9 reviews
October 22, 2025
"Remigration" ist für Martin Sellner nicht bloß ein politischer Vorschlag, sondern eine grundlegende Entscheidung über den Erhalt der eigenen nationalen Identität. In seinem Buch „Remigration: Ein Vorschlag“ entwickelt er ein umfassendes Konzept zu einem der derzeit kontroversesten Themen Deutschlands.
Sellner erläutert darin seine Vorstellungen zur praktischen Umsetzung einer Remigrationspolitik und setzt sich ausführlich mit gängigen Gegenargumenten auseinander, die er aus seiner Sicht zu entkräften versucht.
Mit rund 180 Anmerkungen und Quellen ist das Buch sorgfältig dokumentiert und bietet Lesern die Möglichkeit, viele der angesprochenen Themen eigenständig weiter zu recherchieren. Insgesamt präsentiert es sich als programmatisches Werk, das sowohl politische Befürworter als auch Kritiker zu einer intensiven Auseinandersetzung mit dem Thema Migration anregt.
Für mich ist es ein sehr detailliertes und wichtiges Werk, das dazu anregt, sich intensiv mit dem Thema auseinanderzusetzen und die eigene Perspektive dazu zu entwickeln oder zu vertiefen.
Sellner erläutert darin seine Vorstellungen zur praktischen Umsetzung einer Remigrationspolitik und setzt sich ausführlich mit gängigen Gegenargumenten auseinander, die er aus seiner Sicht zu entkräften versucht.
Mit rund 180 Anmerkungen und Quellen ist das Buch sorgfältig dokumentiert und bietet Lesern die Möglichkeit, viele der angesprochenen Themen eigenständig weiter zu recherchieren. Insgesamt präsentiert es sich als programmatisches Werk, das sowohl politische Befürworter als auch Kritiker zu einer intensiven Auseinandersetzung mit dem Thema Migration anregt.
Für mich ist es ein sehr detailliertes und wichtiges Werk, das dazu anregt, sich intensiv mit dem Thema auseinanderzusetzen und die eigene Perspektive dazu zu entwickeln oder zu vertiefen.
January 30, 2024
Martin Sellner aims to outline a political strategy for Europe’s future with Remigration. Yet what presents itself as an analysis quickly reveals itself as ideologically charged wishful thinking devoid of any real political substance. Instead of a thoughtful engagement with migration and society, Sellner delivers a collection of polemics, selective anecdotes, and historical distortions. The result is a book that not only fails argumentatively but also disturbingly exposes how little its author understands—or wants to understand—about the complexity of modern societies.
Sellner claims that “remigration” is a viable solution to social challenges. Yet even a cursory look at his reasoning exposes the absurdity of this idea. Who exactly is supposed to be “remigrated”? To where? According to what criteria? Who decides? What economic, social, and foreign policy consequences would such a plan entail? Sellner offers no serious answers to these fundamental questions—likely because none exist without resorting to massive human rights violations or political impossibilities. Instead, he retreats into vague insinuations, hoping his audience won’t ask too many questions.
Rather than relying on serious sociological or economic studies, Sellner juggles out-of-context statistics and alarmist claims. His historical arguments are, at best, selectively chosen and, at worst, outright distorted. Migration has been a constant factor in human history and, in many cases, a driver of economic and cultural progress—a fact Sellner conveniently ignores. The few numbers he does present serve not for analysis but for dramatization. Serious political science or economic perspectives are entirely absent, presumably because they would contradict his thesis.
Sellner’s approach follows a familiar pattern of right-wing populist rhetoric: he constructs threats, defines a clear enemy, and presents an apparently simple solution to an allegedly existential problem. This method may be effective in political campaigning, but as a serious contribution to debate, it is worthless. Political theory requires more than alarmism and resentment—it demands empirical grounding, nuance, and a connection to reality. Sellner’s book offers none of these.
Even more alarming than its intellectual shortcomings is the sheer detachment from reality underlying the entire concept. “Remigration” could only be enforced through massive state violence or not at all—a harsh truth Sellner evades with rhetorical contortions. In his portrayal, “remigration” is a kind of magical reset button that solves all societal problems without creating new ones. There is no evidence that his proposal would have any positive social or economic effects—quite the opposite. Yet such details seem of no interest to the author.
Remigration is not a serious political analysis but an agitational pamphlet that relies more on rhetorical wishful thinking than on reality. It is a book for those who prefer their world simple rather than complex and are willing to ignore facts in favor of ideology. Anyone genuinely interested in migration policy, social cohesion, or Europe’s future should turn to scholarly works. Sellner’s book, on the other hand, belongs in the category of intellectual failures—or, depending on one’s perspective, political fairy tales.
Sellner claims that “remigration” is a viable solution to social challenges. Yet even a cursory look at his reasoning exposes the absurdity of this idea. Who exactly is supposed to be “remigrated”? To where? According to what criteria? Who decides? What economic, social, and foreign policy consequences would such a plan entail? Sellner offers no serious answers to these fundamental questions—likely because none exist without resorting to massive human rights violations or political impossibilities. Instead, he retreats into vague insinuations, hoping his audience won’t ask too many questions.
Rather than relying on serious sociological or economic studies, Sellner juggles out-of-context statistics and alarmist claims. His historical arguments are, at best, selectively chosen and, at worst, outright distorted. Migration has been a constant factor in human history and, in many cases, a driver of economic and cultural progress—a fact Sellner conveniently ignores. The few numbers he does present serve not for analysis but for dramatization. Serious political science or economic perspectives are entirely absent, presumably because they would contradict his thesis.
Sellner’s approach follows a familiar pattern of right-wing populist rhetoric: he constructs threats, defines a clear enemy, and presents an apparently simple solution to an allegedly existential problem. This method may be effective in political campaigning, but as a serious contribution to debate, it is worthless. Political theory requires more than alarmism and resentment—it demands empirical grounding, nuance, and a connection to reality. Sellner’s book offers none of these.
Even more alarming than its intellectual shortcomings is the sheer detachment from reality underlying the entire concept. “Remigration” could only be enforced through massive state violence or not at all—a harsh truth Sellner evades with rhetorical contortions. In his portrayal, “remigration” is a kind of magical reset button that solves all societal problems without creating new ones. There is no evidence that his proposal would have any positive social or economic effects—quite the opposite. Yet such details seem of no interest to the author.
Remigration is not a serious political analysis but an agitational pamphlet that relies more on rhetorical wishful thinking than on reality. It is a book for those who prefer their world simple rather than complex and are willing to ignore facts in favor of ideology. Anyone genuinely interested in migration policy, social cohesion, or Europe’s future should turn to scholarly works. Sellner’s book, on the other hand, belongs in the category of intellectual failures—or, depending on one’s perspective, political fairy tales.
January 11, 2026
Excelente livro, com a particularidade de ter em poucas páginas o conteúdo suficiente para um entendimento geral do que seria uma politica de remigração a existir no futuro. A concepção do livro está muito bem conseguida atingindo todos os temas fulcrais, seja no plano económico ao moral, dos métodos às categorizações.
Inclui também exemplos históricos de remigração, alguns bem recentes e uma nota final do autor. O conceito de cidade-modelo é uma ideia excelente e as divisão em três categorias imigrantes para facilitação do escrutínio é também uma ideia bem conseguida.
Exemplos de politicas de integração e imigração usados por Israel e o Bahrain são importantes para percebermos que a politica é uma ferramenta moldável, que serve o interesse comum e não um conjunto de ideias imutáveis quase como se fosse uma escritura sagrada.
Inclui também exemplos históricos de remigração, alguns bem recentes e uma nota final do autor. O conceito de cidade-modelo é uma ideia excelente e as divisão em três categorias imigrantes para facilitação do escrutínio é também uma ideia bem conseguida.
Exemplos de politicas de integração e imigração usados por Israel e o Bahrain são importantes para percebermos que a politica é uma ferramenta moldável, que serve o interesse comum e não um conjunto de ideias imutáveis quase como se fosse uma escritura sagrada.
July 6, 2026
Einzig interessant an dem Buch ist, wie Sellner (bereits vor 2 Jahren) immer wieder die Anknüpfung an die offiziellen Ziele der Behörden und Parteien gelingt. Zudem sollte es ein weiteres Beispiel dafür sein, dass man mit dem "Nutzen"-Argument hinsichtlich Migration nicht mitmachen sollte, da es schon eine falsche Betrachtung ist, die den Standpunkt teilt, den es gerade zu kritisieren gilt.
Schwach ist am Buch insbesondere, dass Sellner kaum mal versucht, den Quatsch der nationalen Homogenität ("relative ethnokulturelle Kongruenz") grundlegend zu begründen, sondern diese immer nur als Setzung vorkommt. Der Begründungsversuch erschöpft sich in der Behauptung, das Volk sei als wirkmächtige Gemeinschaft "empirisch nachweisbar" - womit die Kongruenz nicht begründet, sondern in den Existenznachweis hineingesetzt wird. Dass deren (vermeintliches) Fehlen dann mit Notwendigkeit aus sich heraus zu den beschriebenen Problemen führt, muss man halt ideologisch glauben oder nicht. Alles wird aus der Notwendigkeit der Homogenität abgeleitet, die Krisensymptome (Kriminalitätsstatistiken etc.) erscheinen umgekehrt als Folge ihres Fehlens und begründen so das Erfordernis der Homogenität - ein einziger Zirkel.
Der einzige empirische Nachweis für den behaupteten notwendigen Zusammenhang eines gesellschaftlichen Zerfalls als Ableitung aus einer steigenden Diversität ist eine Meta Studie zu sozialem Vertrauen, deren Autoren die von ihnen gemessene Effektstärke selbst als "rather modest" einordnen und „apokalyptische" Bedrohungsszenarien als übertrieben zurückweisen (Dinesen et al. 2020, 450, 457 ff.). Der Schluss von einer Partialkorrelation von −0,0256 auf Faustrecht und Staatszerfall ist jedenfalls mutig. Die Notwendigkeit, mit der aus dem Fehlen ethnokultureller Homgenität die beschriebenen Zerfallserscheinungen folgen sollen, wird an keiner Stelle begründet, sondern durch selektives Zitieren simuliert.
Schwach ist am Buch insbesondere, dass Sellner kaum mal versucht, den Quatsch der nationalen Homogenität ("relative ethnokulturelle Kongruenz") grundlegend zu begründen, sondern diese immer nur als Setzung vorkommt. Der Begründungsversuch erschöpft sich in der Behauptung, das Volk sei als wirkmächtige Gemeinschaft "empirisch nachweisbar" - womit die Kongruenz nicht begründet, sondern in den Existenznachweis hineingesetzt wird. Dass deren (vermeintliches) Fehlen dann mit Notwendigkeit aus sich heraus zu den beschriebenen Problemen führt, muss man halt ideologisch glauben oder nicht. Alles wird aus der Notwendigkeit der Homogenität abgeleitet, die Krisensymptome (Kriminalitätsstatistiken etc.) erscheinen umgekehrt als Folge ihres Fehlens und begründen so das Erfordernis der Homogenität - ein einziger Zirkel.
Der einzige empirische Nachweis für den behaupteten notwendigen Zusammenhang eines gesellschaftlichen Zerfalls als Ableitung aus einer steigenden Diversität ist eine Meta Studie zu sozialem Vertrauen, deren Autoren die von ihnen gemessene Effektstärke selbst als "rather modest" einordnen und „apokalyptische" Bedrohungsszenarien als übertrieben zurückweisen (Dinesen et al. 2020, 450, 457 ff.). Der Schluss von einer Partialkorrelation von −0,0256 auf Faustrecht und Staatszerfall ist jedenfalls mutig. Die Notwendigkeit, mit der aus dem Fehlen ethnokultureller Homgenität die beschriebenen Zerfallserscheinungen folgen sollen, wird an keiner Stelle begründet, sondern durch selektives Zitieren simuliert.
June 21, 2026
Il termine “Remigrazione” a molte persone può far paura associandolo a concetti totalmente lontani da noi e dalla nostra realtà. Tutto questo si chiama, semplicemente, ignoranza. Sì perché queste persone ne ignorano il significato, ignorano i pericoli del mondo di oggi e vivono totalmente in una bolla ideologica anacronistica, costruita ad hoc da chi dalla sostituzione etnica ci si sta arricchendo in modo indegno. In questo libro, in questa proposta, non dico che si celi la panacea al più grande male dell’occidente moderno, ma sicuramente aiuta ad aprire gli occhi e a trovare soluzioni intelligenti e razionali nel pieno rispetto delle leggi e dell’umanità. È un manifesto della razionalità e della ragione in un mondo di disvalori e di anti-patriottismo dilagante. L’ultimo baluardo di difesa contro una trasformazione che a breve sarà definitiva e deleteria per tutto il vecchio continente e che potrebbe rendere reali le “visioni” della Fallaci.
Prima di parlare di Remigrazione e di “integrazione”, è indispensabile leggere questo scritto per poter commentare e, al limite, criticare con cognizione di causa.
Prima di parlare di Remigrazione e di “integrazione”, è indispensabile leggere questo scritto per poter commentare e, al limite, criticare con cognizione di causa.
August 16, 2024
Excellent book. This was my first attempt at reading a whole book in German after years of studying the language and I couldn't have picked a better choice. As Martin so eloquently states in the novel "whether it was by chance or destiny this book found it's way into the hands of this reader." I cannot recommend this book enough. It outlines the exact policy Europe and the United States need to implement in order to save our nations and people.
October 19, 2025
Ein sehr schönes Buch, sehr empfehlenswert! War positiv überrascht.
May 26, 2026
En barco o en avión
La propuesta está muy bien, pero ya estamos en un punto de no retorno, estamos luchando contra gigantes ,no seremos capaces de preservar nuestra tierra, nuestras creencias, nuestra raza, nuestras costumbres si el medio necesario para ello está controlado por las élites globalistas.
Divide vencerás , se lo saben al dedillo.
La propuesta está muy bien, pero ya estamos en un punto de no retorno, estamos luchando contra gigantes ,no seremos capaces de preservar nuestra tierra, nuestras creencias, nuestra raza, nuestras costumbres si el medio necesario para ello está controlado por las élites globalistas.
Divide vencerás , se lo saben al dedillo.
March 14, 2025
Joa, ne, aber kann man lesen
Displaying 1 - 9 of 9 reviews