*ARC provided by Harlequin Trade Publishing and Netgalley*
I'm typically not a harsh reviewer when it comes to ARCs because reading is subjective and I never want to harm an author's career, but this was truly so bad that I started taking notes.
Setting aside my issues with the pacing, plot, relationships, dialogue, and basically everything about this book, I want to start with the most concerning aspect of this book. I'm white, so obviously I'm not the most qualified person to dictate whether or not something is racist, but the characterization of the only Black character in this entire book (other than 2 side characters that are each mentioned once and basically get no dialogue) really bothered me. Noah, who is the best friend of Logan (the love interest) is introduced in a concerning way, which was basically the tall large threatening black friend of a male villain love interest, who isn't even given a name for a good amount of the time he's in this book. On the main character's first impression of him, without him even saying anything or moving, she says he's built like a linebacker (this takes place in America but none of these witches/warlocks do sports!!!!! or even partake in any sort of human culture like football why would this be the first descriptor that comes to mind?) A direct quote in her first encounter with him is "there was a coiled energy about him that told me if needed, he could turn from neutral to deadly in a heartbeat." Mind you he's literally just standing there and being tall and Black - seems like someone is stereotyping idk. Noah gets absolutely no character development, has no personality traits other than being the friend (more like bodyguard the way he's written) to Logan. You could have replaced his character with some sort of protecting familiar and there would have been very little change he has so little dialogue. This wouldn't have necessarily bothered me if it didn't feel like the shittiest excuse for diversity I've ever seen. It's not a move for inclusivity if you're just writing a poorly written stereotype of a Black man whose only purpose is to stand next to the love interest. There were some other quotes that made me side eye both the main character and the author. One that stood out to me was, "Your master left. Hope you're not on a choke chain." This was said to Noah by Paisley, the main character. Genuinely disturbing and there's no way the author didn't recognize that this was NOT the way to phrase the sentiment she was attempting to convey. Another one that bothered me was, "Noah stood three feet away, dressed in all black, because that wasn't creepy. 'We need to get a fucking bell on you,' I said with as much snarl as I could manage." These quotes wouldn't bother me if Noah was white, but the author made a conscious decision to write a Black character then had her main character say things that, to a Black man, come off as racially motivated. It's worth noting that there are no other non-white characters (unless you want to count the Paisley's best friend, Belle, whose mother is from India? She lives in India, but I'm not sure if it's stated that she's Indian though I guess it's implied. But all of Paisley's physical descriptions are about her being a redhead, which doesn't immediately make her fully white but still felt like a really poor attempt at inclusivity, almost like the author last minute decided to make her mom live in India).
Next, this was incredibly poorly written, and I can only compare it to the 2010s paranormal romance-ish book you read in middle school that was soooo tropey in every way. The setting, the characters, their mannerisms, the relationship, etc. This was not a compelling novel at any point, and I really wanted to DNF it in the first 10 chapters but decided to stick it out and see if it got better. The pacing was genuinely awful and I was so bored half the time. So many scenes felt unnecessary and were like a chore to read. The worldbuilding was incredibly clunky and just shoved at you through dialogue. The first half of this book at least has some things happening, but I cannot point out a single thing that happens in the second half other than like 2 sex scenes. There was essentially no 3rd act conflict and the ending was the definition of unsatisfying and anticlimactic, giving the reader absolutely no reason to continue this series. The romance is bland, the plot is all over the place ad barely there, there are no stakes and no cliffhangers, the questions that need to be answered aren't clearly defined enough to be intriguing, and none of the characters are likable!!! Why would I torture myself with the second book?
One thing about this book that so clearly stood out was the absolutely terrible dialogue, characterization, and relationships in this book. First off, Paisley is the youngest of five children, who all go to this super prestigious school (which really didn't seem that prestigious to me because there's only like 5 schools but anyway) and all of them are walking clichés with no personality traits, just very clearly defined walking tropes. Also, this author is definitely an only child because no siblings would ever interact this way?? They're constantly calling each other baby sis or big bro, and I'm pretty sure no sibling has ever used this term seriously. They tease each other, but in a really gentle and nice way, which was just entirely unrealistic. Like they were always happy and content with each other and never fighting...sorry have you ever interacted with five siblings all within 4 years of age? They also kind of felt like that parody movie of the Brady Bunch, where there's like a weird almost sexual undercurrent at times? They talked about sex entirely too much for my comfort (I can confidently say I've never bragged about my boobs to my brother!) None of the relationships, family or otherwise, are even slightly realistic. Everyone, especially Paisley, who is supposed to be 22, acts WAYYYY younger than they are, and the college treats them like they're high school students and not literal adults. It felt like the oldest sibling was about 17, when the youngest is actually 22! I genuinely have a theory that this started as a YA novel set in a private high school (thus the literal uniforms like they're at Hogwarts or something) but at the last minute the author decided she wanted to write smut so she just ctrl + f'd every character to be 22 instead of 16. Everything would make so much more sense if they were 16. The dialogue is so clunky and unrealistic, I genuinely questioned if it was written by AI because I cannot imagine a human thinking the dialogue is realistic. It was jarring to go from a sentence nobody would ever say or think in real to life to modern day slang like "situationships". (NOT accusing this author of using AI in her book by the way)
Logan and Paisley. You'd think that since this is a "romantasy" (it's not, in my opinion as a professional romantasy reader) there would be some frequent appearances from the love interest, but no. He really doesn't show up much, and Paisley for the most part doesn't interact with him. Obviously there are some moments of tension or like insulting each other, as well as 2 smut scenes, but other than that he's pretty absent. He has no development whatsoever, and no actual personality, just kind of staring there stoically and giving nothing away on his face, but sometimes threatening her family or her. When he is there, he's honestly pretty annoying and insufferable, which I personally don't find attractive at all. I also cringed HARD at their first kiss, which is never a good sign. One of them says, "fuck it" and then kisses the other, which is such a cliché that it reminded me of when I was in middle school, and my friend brought me on her first date with her boyfriend, and I had to hide behind a bush with our other friend while they had their first kiss, and he (a 13 year old boy) said "fuck it" and kind of kissed her. That was my mental image. There was no banter at all, very little tension, and pretty much nothing that makes a good romance.
Some of my smaller issues that just bothered me
- Her name is PAISLEY. no offense to the Paisley's of the world but I'm pretty sure she's supposed to be super badass and Paisley is just not giving me that vibe. If she was super feminine and nice and sweet and soft then was also a badass, I'd love that, but that was the not the vibe here.
- Again with the names, I'm not viewing a guy named LOGAN as a super powerful scary villainous wizard guy. He just seems like he's going to spike my drink
- I immediately clocked that this author was not American, because the way America was mentioned was so weird? Like Paisley is from Spokane, Washington and this college is in a rural area of New York, but it's in "the wilds of New York state". And the school system was referred to as primary and secondary school, which is not at all what American schools are referred to as. Even some of the phrases used were just not fitting for America. I don't really know why this author wanted to set their book in America when it could have easily been in any other country. Not a big deal it just bugged me
- there was a weird random love traingle introduced that had a very obvious outcome, and didn't really amount to anything, so that was just weird. This felt like yet another thing that was reminiscent of 2010s paranormal fantasy/romance except it's missing the things that made those so good (like the tension, banter, compelling plot, romance, etc)
Truly hated this, would not recommend it, and have no interest in reading the second book.