Long back, Honore de Balzac wrote. “Behind every great fortune lies a great crime.” In his book ‘Ambani & Sons’, Hamish McDonald weaves an interesting narrative on a fortune built on subversion of various regulatory systems of India. He goes on to describe in detail as to how Dhirubhai Ambani, a man who was born in a lower middle class household on the arid backwaters of Gujarat, went on to become one of the most powerful predatory capitalists of India. The author also weaves the political history of the country during the rise of Ambani and shows how he skillfully used the various loopholes in the ‘License and Permit Raj’ of a controlled economy to build an industrial empire with near monopolistic powers and remained without paying Corporate Income Tax for nearly 40 years by mergers of various companies under his fiefdom. The success of Ambani was also traceable to his personal relations with politicians of varied and opposing ideologies which enabled him to manipulate the system near uninterruptedly. An example of his influence on politicians of Congress and Bharatiya Janata Party is mentioned in pages 375-376. Many readers of the magazines in India may not be unaware of the scandals and scams mentioned in the book. These scams and scandals caught the imagination of the public and were quickly forgotten. The success of the author is that he tries to reconcile the contradictory voices of adulation and criticism of Ambani during various scams and scandals and builds an interesting narrative with a perspective and insight which may not be possible in disbursed articles published in magazines.
The author points out that “the criticisms (about Ambani) were brushed aside by most investors, as well as by many of the journalists. The ‘dark’ side of Dhirubhai was part of his attraction. It was the thumb in the nose at the bureaucrats, the corrupt politicians and an exploitative business elite seen as cornering the wealth of India and wasting it” And the once derided Gujaratis felt that Dhirubhai has taken on and beaten the Parsis, the Marwaris and the Punjabis at their own game. And for a lot of his admirers if he had bent the rules, engineered loopholes, or cleverly avoided tax, Dhirubhai was only doing what any industrialist would do, given the opportunity, or the ability to carry it out. How else would a complete newcomer with no capital or education will get the break?” (Page 81). No wonder, in a country where a vast majority of population does not have faith in either the politicians or Govt. Authorities, Dhriubhai attracted a huge following which is only reserved for film stars or cricket players and had a cult like following among a lot of shareholders in India.
The author also touches upon the ambivalence among Indians about the predatory corporate activities of Dhirubhai. And he shows that the cheer leaders of Dhirubhai were not limited to middle class only. Some of the sharpest minds -senior journalists and intellectuals did not see anything wrong in the methods of Dhirubhai. The author gives the examples of many such shrewd politicians, senior journalists and intellectuals who were taking the side of Ambani, According to journalist Philip Bowring, a respected Hong Kong based-based authority on Asian business , such methods of Dhirubhai are unavoidable to “beat the system (of bureaucratic controls, state interventions, etc.) to get ahead, it was necessary to exploit the human frailties of its power holders. Everyone did it. Ambani did it more effectively.” And Gurcharan Das observed that while India needs entrepreneurs like Mukesh Ambani(elder son of Dhirubhai) it also needs a much stronger state to apply rules against abuse of market power.(P 376) But surprising is the example of Arun Shourie, one of the boldest intellectuals India produced who had the courage to critically analyse the judgments of the Supreme Court of India for its inconsistencies and who lamented about the tendency of Indians for “Worshiping False Gods”. It was his speech in July, 2003 on the first anniversary of Dhirubhai’s Death anniversary which shockingly revealed his 180 degree turn on his assessment of Dhirubhai.(Page 289).
The author gets his interpretation wrong when he touches upon the conduct of “King Yudhishtra” on the battle field of Kurukshetra without understanding the epic Mahabharata. (pages 371-372) King Yudhistra and his brothers complete their part of penance after losing the war of Dice with Duryodhana and seek their share of the kingdom which they lost. It was the arrogance and adamant attitude of Duryodhana which results in the war of Kurukshetra. It was not a war of vengeance but of asserting the rights of persons wronged.
But what cannot be denied is that the author succeeds in laying bare the corruption of the Indian political class and the weaknesses of Indian bureaucracy coupled with the unprincipled stand of some of the senior journalists in suppressing the wrong doings of the Dhirubhai. The following comments by S. Gurumurthy, a crusader against Dhirubhai, are apt in this context. “If the main rule prohibits something, get a sub-rule added which permits it. Business thrives on such rules. Touts make their fortunes, politicians enhance their power and bureaucrats their importance. Rule of law at once becomes sub-rule of law and sub-rule eventually becomes subversive rule” (Perhaps S. Gurumurthy carefully avoids mentioning the provisos subverting the main object of Article 15 and 16 of the Constitution by the never ending exceptions inserted under these Articles by Constitutional amendments). And he continues. “ Truth reveals itself, though often belatedly. This admirably suits the politician in power. The interregnum between truth and its revelation is generally a period of manipulation. In this interregnum alibis and half-truths rule. Finally, unless someone is alert, truth gets confined to the archives. Result: alibis masquerade as truth.” (pages 128-129).
Nobody can deny the role of entrepreneurs in enhancing the economic activities of a country. But, it is necessary that there should be checks on them lest they become predatory. Adulation for Ambani from many exhibit the changed values in the country. Quite aptly, the author mentions the fact that sixty years after ‘freedom at midnight’, the Modh Bania from Saurashtra named Dhirubhai Ambani seemed to portray the spirit of the new India more than the region’s other most famous Modh Bania, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi.(Page 378). Hamish McDonald is to be lauded for bringing out an objective book which brings out the faults of a failed political and bureaucratic system which gives rise to such great fortunes being made at the cost of national resources.