What do you think?
Rate this book
Jacqueline Kirby #2
The Murders of Richard III
When attractive American Jacqueline Kirby is invited to an English country mansion for a weekend costume affair, she experts only one mystery. Since the hosts and guests are all fanatic devotees of King Richard III, they hope to clear his name of the 500-year old accusation that he killed the little princess in the Tower of London.
Jacqueline is amused at the group's eccentricities until history begins to repeat itself. A dangerous practical joker recreates famous fifteenth-century murder methods—beheading, poisoning, smothering, and even drowning in a butt of malmsey. As the jokes become more and more macabre, one at last proves fatal.
Jacqueline puts all her observations together for a dazzling solution that will surprise even the most attentive reader.
Jacqueline is amused at the group's eccentricities until history begins to repeat itself. A dangerous practical joker recreates famous fifteenth-century murder methods—beheading, poisoning, smothering, and even drowning in a butt of malmsey. As the jokes become more and more macabre, one at last proves fatal.
Jacqueline puts all her observations together for a dazzling solution that will surprise even the most attentive reader.
230 pages, Mass Market Paperback
First published January 1, 1974
218 people are currently reading
1429 people want to read
About the author
Barbara Mertz
10 books228 followersBarbara Mertz (September 29, 1927 – August 8, 2013) was an American author who wrote under her own name as well as under the pseudonyms Elizabeth Peters and Barbara Michaels.
Barbara G. Mertz studied at the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, receiving an M.A. in 1950 and a Ph.D. in Egyptology in 1952. In 1950 she married Richard Mertz and had two children, Elizabeth and Peter. She was divorced in 1969. A past president of American Crime Writers League, she served on the Editorial Advisory Board of KMT, A Modern Journal of Ancient Egypt. She was also a member of the Egypt Exploration Society and the James Henry Breasted Circle of the Oriental Institute. Under her own name she was the author of Temples, Tombs and Hieroglyphs, A Popular history of Ancient Egypt and Red Land, Black Land, Daily Life in Ancient Egypt. Under her pseudonym as Barbara Michaels she has written twenty nine novels of suspense. As Elizabeth Peters, she has produced thirty seven mystery-suspense novels, many of them set in Egypt and the Middle East.
Dr. Mertz was awarded a D.H.L. from Hood College in 1989. The Mystery Writers of America awarded her the MWA Grandmaster in 1998. She has also received the Lifetime Achievement Award from Malice Domestic and the Grandmaster Award from Bouchercon.
Barbara G. Mertz studied at the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, receiving an M.A. in 1950 and a Ph.D. in Egyptology in 1952. In 1950 she married Richard Mertz and had two children, Elizabeth and Peter. She was divorced in 1969. A past president of American Crime Writers League, she served on the Editorial Advisory Board of KMT, A Modern Journal of Ancient Egypt. She was also a member of the Egypt Exploration Society and the James Henry Breasted Circle of the Oriental Institute. Under her own name she was the author of Temples, Tombs and Hieroglyphs, A Popular history of Ancient Egypt and Red Land, Black Land, Daily Life in Ancient Egypt. Under her pseudonym as Barbara Michaels she has written twenty nine novels of suspense. As Elizabeth Peters, she has produced thirty seven mystery-suspense novels, many of them set in Egypt and the Middle East.
Dr. Mertz was awarded a D.H.L. from Hood College in 1989. The Mystery Writers of America awarded her the MWA Grandmaster in 1998. She has also received the Lifetime Achievement Award from Malice Domestic and the Grandmaster Award from Bouchercon.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 282 reviews
January 13, 2013
Fairly average, predictable and try hard 'English Country House' mystery with a quirky American librarian as the sleuth. The subject matter was not dissimilar to Tey's The Daughter of Time but I'm afraid that's where the comparison ends. However, I did enjoy that this book characterized fanatical Ricardians as complete nutters and I couldn't resist awarding it an extra star for that fact alone ;-).
February 14, 2021
Sir Richard Weldon hosts a meeting of fellow devotees of Richard III at his English Country House for purposes of reading of some scholarly papers, a medieval themed banquet and costume ball, and, most importantly, to announce the re-discovery of a letter from Elizabeth of York in which she declares her love for her uncle Richard. That letter had been lost for centuries and the recent unearthing of the letter purportedly contains additional pages clearing Richard III of the murders of her brothers, the Princes in the Tower.
Jacqueline Kirby is among the house guests but not a member of the Ricardian group, having being invited by her love interest, Thomas. She is quick witted and adept at solving mysteries as well as defending herself with a weighty purse which she wields with lethal precision.
The members of the society each assume the identity of people associated with King Richard. Sir Richard himself portrays the king. Others include his cousin who is built like a battleship who is supposed to be Richard’s consumptive wife, Anne Neville. The cousin’s lovely daughter Liz is Elizabeth of York. And if you know your history of this period, you know that there were rumors of an affair between King Richard and his niece Elizabeth. Here, Sir Richard and Liz are mutually attracted.
Someone in the group—or maybe a virulent anti-Ricardian party crasher James Strangeways—decides to play a series of practical jokes on the group by reenacting the murders that have been ascribed to Richard by Shakespeare and some historians. Jacqueline’s friend, Thomas, who is portraying the Duke of Clarence is found hanging upside down in a wine barrel. Are these incidents merely attempts to embarrass the group or might they signal more deadly events in the offing: perhaps an actual murder, in order to facilitate the theft of the letter or for some other motive?
Never fear for Jacqueline solves the mystery and along the way we can laugh at some of the doings of these Richard obsessed people. For instance, at the medieval banquet , Richard’s sister-in-law, the beautiful Elizabeth Woodville, is played by an emaciated woman who cranks out lame poetry idolizing King Richard.
“The sun shone bright, the sky was fair,
The birds did sweetly sing,
Across the green of Bosworth Field,
There rode the brave young king.
Boldly he mounted his great white steed,
He gazed upon the sky,
His slender hands took up the reins
And a tear stood in his eye.”
Call me odd, but I would thoroughly enjoy a party where I can join in a discussion about the Buckingham Rebellion with fellow attendees.
Jacqueline Kirby is among the house guests but not a member of the Ricardian group, having being invited by her love interest, Thomas. She is quick witted and adept at solving mysteries as well as defending herself with a weighty purse which she wields with lethal precision.
The members of the society each assume the identity of people associated with King Richard. Sir Richard himself portrays the king. Others include his cousin who is built like a battleship who is supposed to be Richard’s consumptive wife, Anne Neville. The cousin’s lovely daughter Liz is Elizabeth of York. And if you know your history of this period, you know that there were rumors of an affair between King Richard and his niece Elizabeth. Here, Sir Richard and Liz are mutually attracted.
Someone in the group—or maybe a virulent anti-Ricardian party crasher James Strangeways—decides to play a series of practical jokes on the group by reenacting the murders that have been ascribed to Richard by Shakespeare and some historians. Jacqueline’s friend, Thomas, who is portraying the Duke of Clarence is found hanging upside down in a wine barrel. Are these incidents merely attempts to embarrass the group or might they signal more deadly events in the offing: perhaps an actual murder, in order to facilitate the theft of the letter or for some other motive?
Never fear for Jacqueline solves the mystery and along the way we can laugh at some of the doings of these Richard obsessed people. For instance, at the medieval banquet , Richard’s sister-in-law, the beautiful Elizabeth Woodville, is played by an emaciated woman who cranks out lame poetry idolizing King Richard.
“The sun shone bright, the sky was fair,
The birds did sweetly sing,
Across the green of Bosworth Field,
There rode the brave young king.
Boldly he mounted his great white steed,
He gazed upon the sky,
His slender hands took up the reins
And a tear stood in his eye.”
Call me odd, but I would thoroughly enjoy a party where I can join in a discussion about the Buckingham Rebellion with fellow attendees.
August 31, 2023
This is one of those super clever books that keep you guessing from beginning to end. And then at the end, you go, "Um, DUH! Of course!"
I didn't figure out the WHO or WHY until 3/4 of the way through the book. I did figure out what was going on, but I had a totally different why in mind which absolutely skewed my who.
Clever, interesting, a course in mental gymnastics, and all in a very short book!
I didn't figure out the WHO or WHY until 3/4 of the way through the book. I did figure out what was going on, but I had a totally different why in mind which absolutely skewed my who.
Clever, interesting, a course in mental gymnastics, and all in a very short book!
July 29, 2013
I really, really dislike this character Jacqueline the librarian, and am shocked by it, because I enjoy Peters' other two series very much, especially Vicky Bliss. Maybe it's the third person narrative that keeps the reader more an audience than inside the character's head along for the ride. The character has a lot of Amelia Peabody if she were a late 20th-century divorcee with no binding attachments, but it is the binding attachments and a family of characters that allow us to see into the deeper loyalties and emotions of the character that make Amelia Peabody lovable, rather than arrogant and cold. Jacqueline, like Amelia, expresses certainties about her own character that her actions belie, i.e., that she does care about people and their troubles, but she is a woman set loose in mid-life from the duties of motherhood and she is only serving her own whims. I simply can't find the heart of the woman, and her shenanigans verge on the cruel at times. The mystery is an English country-house Agatha Christie set-up. It is okay, but disliking the main character made it hard to pay attention to whether it was a good mystery or not.
April 8, 2016
I thought that this would be an interesting light read because it was written in 1974 and the subject matter was very relevant to the present day. I was keen to know how Richard III was perceived retrospectively. We have just found out so much more about his physical appearance and how he was buried and I wanted to compare that to what we knew forty years ago. The story is very light and if you are interested in a beginner's guide to who was who at the court of King Richard then you will enjoy it. I found all of the characters equally annoying, they were mainly members of a Ricardian society and most of them are obsessed by the subject. They all meet at the home of Herman Weldon for a weekend of make believe and re-enactment, Weldon taking on the role of Richard III at the gathering. The Guests all dress as one of Richard's contemporaries and it is through their constant arguments and theories about Richard that we get the full history lesson of supposed events during his reign. I felt that there was just too much information as the reader is bombarded by different speculations and anyone who knew nothing about the events would, I feel, come out of it knowing even less than they did in the first place. As for the plot of the story, I was disappointed, I was waiting for something to happen but not much does. The denouement is very lengthy and, I think, struggles to tie in all the ends.
June 4, 2009
Murder and mayhem among the Ricardians, c. 1974.
I didn't enjoy this as much as the Amelia Peabody mysteries I've read, by the same author, but it was an enjoyable way to spend an afternoon in bed when I wasn't feeling well.
I didn't enjoy this as much as the Amelia Peabody mysteries I've read, by the same author, but it was an enjoyable way to spend an afternoon in bed when I wasn't feeling well.
September 16, 2025
A fun companion to Josephine Tey’s The Daughter of Time. Both books center around the divisive Richard III and, specifically, his hypothesized hand in the murder of the princes in the tower, and both give adequate historical context for the event. But Peters’s take involves a traditional country house mystery in which colorful guests reenact this period of 15th century England. Naturally, in true Peters style, it’s humorous, lighthearted, and more than a little campy. Is it the best example of a country house mystery? Hardly - but with Elizabeth Peters, I’ve come to expect a good story with memorable characters, and not necessarily a good mystery. (And I generally enjoy her regardless.)
I believe this is an improvement on the first Jacqueline Kirby mystery, which I found predictable and a little bland (not enough Jacqueline!). I listened to the audio and Grace Conlin’s narration is a marvel - great accents and very dynamic, so I’ll check out her other Peters narrations.
I believe this is an improvement on the first Jacqueline Kirby mystery, which I found predictable and a little bland (not enough Jacqueline!). I listened to the audio and Grace Conlin’s narration is a marvel - great accents and very dynamic, so I’ll check out her other Peters narrations.
May 3, 2023
Too many characters to keep track of, complicated by the fact that they’re all role-playing parts from the life of Richard III, so you have to learn both their modern and historical personas. Perhaps if I was more familiar with the history this book would have been more fun - but it missed the opportunity to really delve into and teach that history. The mystery itself was pretty contrived, and the sleuths were just fine. Sorry Elizabeth Peters - give me Josephine Tey or Margery Allingham any day…
March 3, 2021
She's a bit snippy but she's an interesting character. She's constantly underestimated by her companions but she's smart AF.
August 25, 2020
This was a fun story. Jacqueline is more clearly the heroine but still not the main point of view. The story follows the traditional "country house with limited number of suspects" format, but keeps things different with a series of accidents that may or may not be murder attempts!
October 13, 2021
The Murders of Richard III by Elizabeth Peters.
Read for the third time and reviewed November 17, 2020.
-0-0-0-
Jacqueline Kirby is a librarian with a quick wit and a purse that includes just about anything needed in an emergency. She’s visiting London and is invited by Thomas Carter, her love interest and a university professor, to be his guest at a house party being hosted by Sir Richard Weldon, whose chain of department stores has made him a very wealthy man.
Sir Richard, like Thomas, has more than just a passing interest in Richard III, and the house party guests are a group of like-minded Ricardians who some might call eccentric. (I won’t, though, because I can relate to many of them!) Sir Richard, in fact, has taken his interest to the level of more than just buying the latest book on the subject. His Yorkshire home includes a replica of Crosby Hall – inside and out.
The purpose of the gathering, in addition to the usual reading of papers on Ricardian topics, is to produce a letter recently discovered – the one purportedly written by Elizabeth of York in which she declares her love for her Uncle Richard – in the hope of determining its authenticity.
When Jacqueline arrives at the imitation Crosby Hall, she finds the other guests are all in costume, portraying people associated with Richard III. Sir Richard Weldon is King Richard. Mrs. Ponsonby-Jones, a middle-aged matron, dresses as Anne Neville. Her daughter Liz portrays Elizabeth of York, and her obnoxious, overweight son Percy plays Edward V. Other guests portray Edward of Lancaster, George of Clarence, Lord William Hastings, Elizabeth Woodville, and a few more. Not having a character to play, Jacqueline says she’ll portray Richard’s mistress.
What starts out as an unusual but interesting weekend takes a bizarre turn when someone starts playing nasty practical jokes on the guests – reenacting the titular murders of Richard III (as in the different murders attributed to him by Tudor historians and Shakespeare). “Edward of Lancaster” is found on the floor of the cellar, at first thought to be dead but thankfully only unconscious – left for “dead” on a substitute battlefield. “George of Clarence” finds himself trussed up and hanging upside down in an empty wine barrel. And so on.
At first, it’s thought that the culprit is James Strangways, once a member of the Richard III Society who has turned coat and is now very anti-Ricardian, and who has crashed the party. He’d like nothing better than to embarrass the pro-Richard folk. But Strangways has an alibi…or does he? Later, when things take a deadly turn, the question becomes, is the culprit in fact one of the house guests?
I’ve read this book several times 1) because I enjoy anything written by Elizabeth Peters, and 2) because of its Ricardian theme. There’s history and witty repartee, both of which make this book a winner for me. All except Jacqueline’s referring to Richard as “Old Crookback” on a couple of occasions, but in her defense I’ll point out that this book was written long before Richard’s remains were found. On the other hand, she has a good theory as to what happened to Richard's nephews.
Read for the third time and reviewed November 17, 2020.
-0-0-0-
Jacqueline Kirby is a librarian with a quick wit and a purse that includes just about anything needed in an emergency. She’s visiting London and is invited by Thomas Carter, her love interest and a university professor, to be his guest at a house party being hosted by Sir Richard Weldon, whose chain of department stores has made him a very wealthy man.
Sir Richard, like Thomas, has more than just a passing interest in Richard III, and the house party guests are a group of like-minded Ricardians who some might call eccentric. (I won’t, though, because I can relate to many of them!) Sir Richard, in fact, has taken his interest to the level of more than just buying the latest book on the subject. His Yorkshire home includes a replica of Crosby Hall – inside and out.
The purpose of the gathering, in addition to the usual reading of papers on Ricardian topics, is to produce a letter recently discovered – the one purportedly written by Elizabeth of York in which she declares her love for her Uncle Richard – in the hope of determining its authenticity.
When Jacqueline arrives at the imitation Crosby Hall, she finds the other guests are all in costume, portraying people associated with Richard III. Sir Richard Weldon is King Richard. Mrs. Ponsonby-Jones, a middle-aged matron, dresses as Anne Neville. Her daughter Liz portrays Elizabeth of York, and her obnoxious, overweight son Percy plays Edward V. Other guests portray Edward of Lancaster, George of Clarence, Lord William Hastings, Elizabeth Woodville, and a few more. Not having a character to play, Jacqueline says she’ll portray Richard’s mistress.
What starts out as an unusual but interesting weekend takes a bizarre turn when someone starts playing nasty practical jokes on the guests – reenacting the titular murders of Richard III (as in the different murders attributed to him by Tudor historians and Shakespeare). “Edward of Lancaster” is found on the floor of the cellar, at first thought to be dead but thankfully only unconscious – left for “dead” on a substitute battlefield. “George of Clarence” finds himself trussed up and hanging upside down in an empty wine barrel. And so on.
At first, it’s thought that the culprit is James Strangways, once a member of the Richard III Society who has turned coat and is now very anti-Ricardian, and who has crashed the party. He’d like nothing better than to embarrass the pro-Richard folk. But Strangways has an alibi…or does he? Later, when things take a deadly turn, the question becomes, is the culprit in fact one of the house guests?
I’ve read this book several times 1) because I enjoy anything written by Elizabeth Peters, and 2) because of its Ricardian theme. There’s history and witty repartee, both of which make this book a winner for me. All except Jacqueline’s referring to Richard as “Old Crookback” on a couple of occasions, but in her defense I’ll point out that this book was written long before Richard’s remains were found. On the other hand, she has a good theory as to what happened to Richard's nephews.
Read
July 30, 2025A country house party, quirky Richard the III Society gathering, and someone has a malicious bag of tricks playing out against all the guests. Elizabeth Peters has a fun blend of cozy mystery and historical element with an enigmatic, clever middle-aged heroine in Jacqueline Kirby.
This is the second book in the Jacqueline Kirby series. Both the first book, The Seventh Sinner and this one, The Murders of Richard III work perfectly fine as standalones.
Jacqueline is on summer holiday from her university librarian job visiting a scholarly friend in England. Thomas is hoping for a light summer fling, but Jacqueline is more interested in the tea cakes and historical sites. He manages to talk her into attending a country house party hosted by one of the members of his Ricardian society. His group are pro- Richard and feel dogmatic about his innocence in killing the princes and any other dastardly deeds the Tudors leveled at him. Jacquline thinks it will be fun even after she meets the quirky group. There are reports, poems, dress-up and the promise of a mysterious document sent to the group that, if authentic, will provide further proof of Richard’s innocence.
Told from Thomas’ point of view, the book takes a bit for the plot to get moving, but then the malicious tricks and pranks start happening. Each member of the society is role-playing and each fall foul of the prankster. Most think the jokes against the society are irritating and brush it off, but not Jacqueline. She thinks its dangerous and there is a malicious secret intent behind it all.
The Murders of Richard the III was one that was entertaining, but didn’t have a big payoff though I did appreciate being surprised by the who and the why. I enjoyed the speculation about Richard III and that historical period, the characters were quirky as a group, and Jacqueline was a background player much of the time until a catalyst was needed to take all the loose pieces and bring them into a cohesive whole. Thomas was a good pick as the level-headed observer who isn’t as clever and sharp as Jacqueline when it comes to the mystery, but he is reliable and manages to see a great deal.
Grace Conlin continues to narrate and I enjoyed her voicing Jacqueline and the variety of cast, particularly the society members.
This has been a fun revisit to the series in audio edition and I look forward to pressing on to the next Jacqueline Kirby series installment. Those who enjoy light, gently-paced cozy historical mysteries should check these out.
My full review will post at The Reading Frenzy 7.23.25.
This is the second book in the Jacqueline Kirby series. Both the first book, The Seventh Sinner and this one, The Murders of Richard III work perfectly fine as standalones.
Jacqueline is on summer holiday from her university librarian job visiting a scholarly friend in England. Thomas is hoping for a light summer fling, but Jacqueline is more interested in the tea cakes and historical sites. He manages to talk her into attending a country house party hosted by one of the members of his Ricardian society. His group are pro- Richard and feel dogmatic about his innocence in killing the princes and any other dastardly deeds the Tudors leveled at him. Jacquline thinks it will be fun even after she meets the quirky group. There are reports, poems, dress-up and the promise of a mysterious document sent to the group that, if authentic, will provide further proof of Richard’s innocence.
Told from Thomas’ point of view, the book takes a bit for the plot to get moving, but then the malicious tricks and pranks start happening. Each member of the society is role-playing and each fall foul of the prankster. Most think the jokes against the society are irritating and brush it off, but not Jacqueline. She thinks its dangerous and there is a malicious secret intent behind it all.
The Murders of Richard the III was one that was entertaining, but didn’t have a big payoff though I did appreciate being surprised by the who and the why. I enjoyed the speculation about Richard III and that historical period, the characters were quirky as a group, and Jacqueline was a background player much of the time until a catalyst was needed to take all the loose pieces and bring them into a cohesive whole. Thomas was a good pick as the level-headed observer who isn’t as clever and sharp as Jacqueline when it comes to the mystery, but he is reliable and manages to see a great deal.
Grace Conlin continues to narrate and I enjoyed her voicing Jacqueline and the variety of cast, particularly the society members.
This has been a fun revisit to the series in audio edition and I look forward to pressing on to the next Jacqueline Kirby series installment. Those who enjoy light, gently-paced cozy historical mysteries should check these out.
My full review will post at The Reading Frenzy 7.23.25.
September 18, 2015
I've been a Ricardian sympathizer since I first made my way through Josephine Tey's The Daughter of Time—in high school? college? I can no longer remember. Since then, a lifetime spent studying Europe from the 5th to the 19th centuries has given me a healthy appreciation of the willingness that rulers displayed to dispatch even close relatives who threatened their power, but the case against Richard still strikes me as weak. So I am a perfect audience for this updated, at times hilarious, revisit to the Ricardian controversy, especially from one of my favorite writers.
Jacqueline Kirby, librarian at a small Midwestern college, is on vacation in London when her friend Thomas invites her to attend a meeting of his Ricardian society, funded by a wealthy industrialist who has just acquired a letter proving Richard's innocence. The meeting at first appears to be a collection of harmless if not entirely pleasant crackpots who dress up in medieval costumes to rehash events 500 years in the past. But then mysterious accidents affect one guest after another, and it becomes clear that someone has decided to replicate the murders attributed to Richard III. The society members insist these incidents are mere pranks, but Jacqueline is not convinced....
Like Die for Love, by the same author and featuring the same amateur detective, this book is charming, intelligent, creative, and funny. Peters does a better job than Tey of infusing her mystery with the pros and cons of Ricardian argument, although the novel does at times veer into information dump. And again like Die for Love, this book ends with a long explanation by Kirby, without which readers could not solve the mystery (although all the necessary pieces are present). But it's still a good read, especially given the recent discovery in Leicester of Richard III's skeleton.
Jacqueline Kirby, librarian at a small Midwestern college, is on vacation in London when her friend Thomas invites her to attend a meeting of his Ricardian society, funded by a wealthy industrialist who has just acquired a letter proving Richard's innocence. The meeting at first appears to be a collection of harmless if not entirely pleasant crackpots who dress up in medieval costumes to rehash events 500 years in the past. But then mysterious accidents affect one guest after another, and it becomes clear that someone has decided to replicate the murders attributed to Richard III. The society members insist these incidents are mere pranks, but Jacqueline is not convinced....
Like Die for Love, by the same author and featuring the same amateur detective, this book is charming, intelligent, creative, and funny. Peters does a better job than Tey of infusing her mystery with the pros and cons of Ricardian argument, although the novel does at times veer into information dump. And again like Die for Love, this book ends with a long explanation by Kirby, without which readers could not solve the mystery (although all the necessary pieces are present). But it's still a good read, especially given the recent discovery in Leicester of Richard III's skeleton.
May 8, 2012
An amusing mystery story about a group of Ricardians with an attractive lady 'detective' given to a dose of sarcasm.
You don't have to be a Ricardian to enjoy the story, but being a bit of one myself, this was my main motivation for reading this - and it made me think I should probably take up the old study (last endulged something like ten years ago now) again.
The book was written in the 1970s, and it shows. In a positive way in the brevity of the book - ah, the good old times, when bestsellers were around 320 pages... - in a more negative way in the general shock this bright, outspoken woman creates among the males of the book.
The reason it's only three stars for me: the author is rather fond of ten-dollar words, which she uses all over the place - excuse me, which she employs abundantly ;) - perhaps in the hopes of sounding elegant, but it's a bit hit-and-miss. Also, the interaction between the characters often seemed haphazard to me: quarrels break out for no reason, frowns and smiles show equally without motivation.
Still, in spite of these it was a quick and amusing read.
You don't have to be a Ricardian to enjoy the story, but being a bit of one myself, this was my main motivation for reading this - and it made me think I should probably take up the old study (last endulged something like ten years ago now) again.
The book was written in the 1970s, and it shows. In a positive way in the brevity of the book - ah, the good old times, when bestsellers were around 320 pages... - in a more negative way in the general shock this bright, outspoken woman creates among the males of the book.
The reason it's only three stars for me: the author is rather fond of ten-dollar words, which she uses all over the place - excuse me, which she employs abundantly ;) - perhaps in the hopes of sounding elegant, but it's a bit hit-and-miss. Also, the interaction between the characters often seemed haphazard to me: quarrels break out for no reason, frowns and smiles show equally without motivation.
Still, in spite of these it was a quick and amusing read.
October 12, 2018
Oct 2018: a bit messy on audio and the fat-shaming is really appalling, perhaps just because I was mildly irritated by reader Grace Conlin and majorly irritated by Jacqueline Kirby’s smugness. I wish that as a know-it-all librarian she would be a bit more kind. Not adjusting the stars but this time I’d not give it more than three.
Aug 2013: Five stars for being a good Jacqueline Kirby, but perhaps I like it because it is so Vicky Blissish? I have a soft spot for historical reenactment crazies and they're all here.
Aug 2013: Five stars for being a good Jacqueline Kirby, but perhaps I like it because it is so Vicky Blissish? I have a soft spot for historical reenactment crazies and they're all here.
August 29, 2020
Thomas is narrating this book. He invites Jacqueline Kirby to a weekend of semi-scholars who are supporting the idea that Richard III did not murder his nephews. (NOTE: this topic was investigated in Josephine Tey's "Daughter of Time.") The party takes place in an English Country house where someone is playing a dangerous game. A each member of the party dresses up the role of one of the major historical characters with the host playing Richard. The mystery is OK. The humor between Thomas and Jacqueline charming.
August 11, 2007
This is a Jacqueline Kirby mystery, and I like her even if she is a too-perfect Mary Sue. The book is fun, a drawing room mystery where all the suspects are within one social group, gathered in one house. The group in question are re-enacting the history of Richard III, so the history and theories about the late king are a bonus. This is a quick, easy read.
March 10, 2019
This was a hard book to read. I appreciate scholarly aspects added to a mystery but this was just too much. I had to look up information about Richard III and the Wars of the Roses and about historical dress to understand what was going on. I was relieved that the book did not involve as many murders as the historical time did. Other Jacqueline Kirby books are much better than this one.
May 12, 2023
Ein Alltime Favorite. Lese ich immer wieder gerne. :) Unterhaltsamer als Elizabeth Peter's Krimis wird es einfach nicht.
[Edit: Das Fatshaming ist jedoch unnötig und ziemlich grässlich. Das hätte man einfach weglassen können.]
[Edit: Das Fatshaming ist jedoch unnötig und ziemlich grässlich. Das hätte man einfach weglassen können.]
February 18, 2020
I've always been interested in Richard III and I really enjoyed the debate in the book--did he or did he not kill the young princes? The character of Thomas kind of annoyed me, though. In general, it was a decent mystery.
September 4, 2008
The most fun of all the Jacqueline Kirby mysteries by Elizabeth Peters.
November 19, 2021
Twisty historic controversy twisted further until it curls. Absolutely wonderful.
May 17, 2025
I just feel like Elizabeth Peters is not an author for me. I shouldn't be re-writing a description of a portrait in my head because I don't like what I'm reading (or think I could do better).
There's also something insidious about the men in her books (this one and one under the name Barbara Michaels) where these men are just so annoying, entitled, arrogant, and demanding and so ready and willing to Well-Actually the FMC that leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Like, I can at least understand the appeal of the alpha man with a heart of gold or whatever in a lot of romances, I can understand the appeal of the rugged, guff man with a tragic past in others. I can understand the fantasy with those, and tend to be more lenient more often than not because of that.
But these books where these mainly academia-based men that are so deeply unpleasant are pushed forward time and again as the love interest for women that they clearly cannot handle or control... It's just gross and gives me the ick.
So no, this author and her stuff is Not For Me.
There's also something insidious about the men in her books (this one and one under the name Barbara Michaels) where these men are just so annoying, entitled, arrogant, and demanding and so ready and willing to Well-Actually the FMC that leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Like, I can at least understand the appeal of the alpha man with a heart of gold or whatever in a lot of romances, I can understand the appeal of the rugged, guff man with a tragic past in others. I can understand the fantasy with those, and tend to be more lenient more often than not because of that.
But these books where these mainly academia-based men that are so deeply unpleasant are pushed forward time and again as the love interest for women that they clearly cannot handle or control... It's just gross and gives me the ick.
So no, this author and her stuff is Not For Me.
December 23, 2020
Reading the Jacqueline Kirby series has been fun because it's like an origin story for Elizabeth Peters and her Amelia Peabody series. I can see hints of what made Amelia Peabody great, but not all the pieces are there yet.
I enjoyed the setting and quirky cast in this novel (Elizabeth Peters must have hated some kid named Percy, because here he is, annoying as can be AND there's another horrible Percy in the Amelia Peabody series) although for the second book in a row I've noticed that there is no kindness for fat people, which is something I haven't noticed in Elizabeth Peters books before, but I find distasteful.
Some of the pacing wasn't quite right and it's a bit of a curious take on a murder mystery, so that and the fat phobia docked it down a bit for me.
I enjoyed the setting and quirky cast in this novel (Elizabeth Peters must have hated some kid named Percy, because here he is, annoying as can be AND there's another horrible Percy in the Amelia Peabody series) although for the second book in a row I've noticed that there is no kindness for fat people, which is something I haven't noticed in Elizabeth Peters books before, but I find distasteful.
Some of the pacing wasn't quite right and it's a bit of a curious take on a murder mystery, so that and the fat phobia docked it down a bit for me.
February 5, 2020
Elizabeth Peters was one of my favorite authors in my teenage years. I’m in the minority as I disliked Amelia Peabody, except for the first book, and loved her Vicky Bliss and Jaqueline Kirby series’ as well as her stand alones.
If I read this when I was younger, I don’t remember it. I like Jaqueline Kirby as a character and think she’s aged well. The problem with this book is that I really don’t care about Richard III or his history and the whole book revolves around it.
If I read this when I was younger, I don’t remember it. I like Jaqueline Kirby as a character and think she’s aged well. The problem with this book is that I really don’t care about Richard III or his history and the whole book revolves around it.
January 3, 2022
Just phenomenal. Only thing - I would have edited out a teensy-weensy bit of the more arcane information.
abandoned
January 18, 2022Sadly, I just cannot connect with Jacqueline Kirby...
dnf
January 28, 2022Feels like I’m reading a textbook more than a fictional mystery. Just can’t get invested.
February 10, 2025
Wow I’m not having good luck with my reading so far this year
October 29, 2024
Oh, dear. Pretty average.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 282 reviews