It's good, but I didn't get the feeling Supervert actually has erotomania or is sadistic like De Sade was. De Sade is the supreme onanist, being that his head represents philosophy and his penis fucking, and together in the act of self-sucking, he charges himself into a fiery armadillo and runs down anything in his way. Philosophy leads to fucking, and fucking leads to philosophy, a looping cycle I can respect.
However, I think Supervert has carried the torch here, while retaining his distance from actual sadism. Premise of the story is, a doctor, Dr. Malenkov, in an unnamed hospitable, dwelling in the S&M R&D lab, falls into a psychosis and vlogs about the post-depraved future. What is post-depravity, you ask? Here's an undesirable tip: "To molest a girl, as Dr Malenkov asserts, is to transform her future into your past." One engages in acts of sex-death using current medical and technological means in order to anticipate the future. Of course, the line gets blurred between what is being anticipated and what is being brought about, people fall for Dr. Malenkov's neosadism, patients at the hospital begin dying gruesomely, etc.
If anything, being one of my critiques, not enough people die however. The few murders contained here can fit in a cupboard, hardly enough to stink up the torture basement. Instead, we have some curious medical procedures undertaken for sexual sadism, but I never got overwhelmed by evil here like I did with De Sade. Sure, the ideas of cloning yourself to fuck it to death or having a hand transplant with your sister's hand for an incestuous solo session is depraved, but I felt very little for the victims here, unlike when I read Justine. De Sade's universe is full of bodies that need to be destroyed, yet he can also get into the victim's mindset and portray Justine as one of the faithful who blindly believes in order to survive against the hostile order of reality. De Sade is an expert at surrounding the victim with evil and enjoys seeing if or when the victim breaks. I didn't get this sense here in Post-Depravity. We do see the continuity of evil in the end of the book, but it takes place in a small medical room. The author is relying on the anonymity of the medical institution to disguise evil within. This is the logical place to extend horror in modernity; we are no longer in the individualistic Enlightenment era of thinking. We are dependent upon vast institutions whereupon we've ceded our individual moral limits for the sake of efficiency and quantitative results.
Yet, the nunnery where you might get a dildo shoved up your ass should be the same, at least in terms of how we think of institutional power, as a medical hospital. Maybe it wasn't as potent for me here because the story primarily revolved around three characters: Kat, Ben Said, and Murasaki, and Justine had a strong narrative element of her against the vicious world, while in Post-Depravity (spoilers) they all die. Which I didn't find too surprising. I got the sense from how Supervert was portraying the architecture and anonymity of the hospital, it made sense to me that evil would nonetheless continue after the main characters gave themselves up to oblivion. The whole medical field would get corrupted by post-depravity, but we really don't get a sense of that here. Things are just starting to get post-depraved, or it may die out entirely in this one hospital, or others where the vlogs begin. That's why I wasn't horrified by anything in this book; the evil of post-depravity never becomes a universal certainty, like sadism is in De Sade.
Still, a good read for interesting tortures and is tight narratively. However, post-depravity still remains an uncertain future in my mind, I didn't get the sense that it would take over the world. In this sense, it remains purely satire, so on those grounds it's pretty good.