This review keeps my original review of the book, August 2014, though it now pertains to this gorgeous oversized hardcover edition. I'll just add that I realize Kindt can be hard work. Some hate his sketchy art, some hate his dialogue, some hate his fragmented, disjointed storytelling, interweaving all these different story threads, but for all these things, I like him. He's using this visual medium of comics to tell the story with as few words as possible. He loves mysteries, classic mysteries, and in a sort of postmodern way deconstructs the very idea of a mystery to help us break down what are the key elements in mystery tales. He loves them and is a student of them.
Kindt interweaves several stories independent of chronology or linear narrative. The stories include a Greek cup's journey through history (this is the image that we follow throughout the book, a thing that ties all of the stories together), a female pirate, and a woman in London during WWI sending money back to her sister--that eventually (after a long and potentially confusing time, maybe) intersect. The ending is surprising and as with all mysteries, surprises abound. Whodunit prevails. Wth is going on prevails. That's mystery. This is more fragmented than most mysteries, it's not Holmes or Agatha Christie, but it still is mystery they would applaud. And I do. I had to read it more than once to get it.
My original August 2014 review:
I read this through twice today and I love it. This is a large volume, but page after page it thrillingly (and okay, sometimes initially confusingly) uses as few words as possible to illustrate how comics can effectively tell a crime story across times and places. Who are the classic spy thriller writers? Take someone like John LeCarre, who uses the English language with subtlety and grace and whose selection of detail is carefully planned. When you read Sir Arthur Conan Doyle or Dashiell Hammett the plots are often intertwined, complicated. As a reader of the genre you learn to pay attention, to be patient and hold all these threads in your head, content that an author will make them, however implausibly, come together for an inevitable but surprising (Poe) conclusion.
Many readers of Matt Kindt on Goodreads seem to struggle with coherence; they get confused, they even give up. If I were Kindt I would pay attention to that, though he seems to keep doing what he does, making these serpentine plots. He seems to acknowledge that he is going to lose some people in the process. But do people give up on LeCarre? Doyle? Hammett? I don't think so! Maybe with Kindt it is because he is pushing the medium, forcing himself to use visual images primarily to tell his tale. He teaches us how to pay attention to visual detail. And I admit I am every time I read a Kindt story a little lost at first; I have to reread to get the links. But I like these kinds of stories that challenge me. And with many great stories I am a little lost at first.
The stories here include a Greek cup's journey through history, a female pirate, and a woman in London during WWII sending money back to her sister, and the three stories eventually intersect, though in ways that surprised me. The cup makes its way through all places and times and stories, and that is interesting, though it's just an image that ties things together, finally. The central story is of two sisters, one of them who gets involved in spying. . . I can't say much more, it's a mystery!
The title makes you think this is for YA: Super Spy! But it's not, it's just calling forth images of noir thrillers, telling us we are about to read an entertaining tale. … but it makes you work harder than most spy stories or pirate tales, so I would say it ain't kid stuff. But I swear the parts do come together to make the engine purr. Not everyone agrees, I get that. Not everyone is convinced that you can tell complicated spy thrillers with very few words, depending for your interpretation on almost exclusively images, but I say if you pay attention to the images and don't just skip ahead (as most readers do with description) to the dialogue, you'll see, he's teaching you how to read images and giving you clues toward coherence.
Some people hate Kindt's sketchy art, but that is as I see it consistent with the storytelling, it is minimalist, using as little as possible to tell the story. I think it's amazingly good, though I will admit that his art-making seems to be improving in (the decade later series I am following) Mind Mgmt, getting sharper and more clearly defined. I think that Kindt's art represents the intersection of crime comics and art comics, actually. He's that good.