What do you think?
Rate this book
Carbon Stranglehold: A Chronicle of Manufactured Crisis and Ecological Collapse
Carbon Stranglehold
A Chronicle of Manufactured Crisis and Ecological Collapse
What could go wrong with carbon capture and carbon sequestration? Nothing other than the law of unintended consequences ..
Dr. Howard Hawkins reflects on what he considers a pivotal moment in March 2032 when constructive climate debate collapsed. During a broadcast of "Climate Crisis Tonight," host Amanda Sterling .. a former meteorologist turned advocacy journalist .. aggressively interviewed Dr. Michael Torres, a climatologist who questioned the increasingly dire climate predictions that dominate media coverage. Sterling challenges Torres on rising temperatures and Greenland ice sheet melting, framing any hesitation as dangerous denial.
Torres attempts to explain that climate systems require careful study before implementing major interventions, but Sterling cuts him off with emotionally charged rhetoric. She pivots to the camera, invoking flooded Miami, extreme Phoenix heat, and heat-related deaths in Chicago, accusing scientists like Torres of "nitpicking over decimal points" while people die. The scene portrays a clash between measured scientific caution and urgent advocacy journalism, suggesting that nuanced climate discussion has been replaced by moral absolutism and emotional appeals that shut down legitimate scientific discourse.
And that is the beginning of the end ..
A Chronicle of Manufactured Crisis and Ecological Collapse
What could go wrong with carbon capture and carbon sequestration? Nothing other than the law of unintended consequences ..
Dr. Howard Hawkins reflects on what he considers a pivotal moment in March 2032 when constructive climate debate collapsed. During a broadcast of "Climate Crisis Tonight," host Amanda Sterling .. a former meteorologist turned advocacy journalist .. aggressively interviewed Dr. Michael Torres, a climatologist who questioned the increasingly dire climate predictions that dominate media coverage. Sterling challenges Torres on rising temperatures and Greenland ice sheet melting, framing any hesitation as dangerous denial.
Torres attempts to explain that climate systems require careful study before implementing major interventions, but Sterling cuts him off with emotionally charged rhetoric. She pivots to the camera, invoking flooded Miami, extreme Phoenix heat, and heat-related deaths in Chicago, accusing scientists like Torres of "nitpicking over decimal points" while people die. The scene portrays a clash between measured scientific caution and urgent advocacy journalism, suggesting that nuanced climate discussion has been replaced by moral absolutism and emotional appeals that shut down legitimate scientific discourse.
And that is the beginning of the end ..
127 pages, Kindle Edition
Published November 14, 2025
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
No one has reviewed this book yet.