An attempt at depth that simply didn’t work. This will be a long review, so in short: if you’re hoping for something deep and insightful in this book, don’t waste your time.
I honestly don’t understand what point the author was trying to make here, but whatever she was trying to say, she said it wrong. Both main characters, the victim and the predator, are portrayed terribly, and that makes this book not just bad, but dangerous.
Let’s start with Mr. Korgy, a 40-year-old creative writing teacher. I’ve read several books that deal with this topic, and usually child predators are portrayed as what they actually are: terrifying. Pathetic, yes, but also manipulative, calculating, abusive, and careful. They groom, create dependency, and that’s what makes them horrifying. Mr. Korgy is not horrifying. He’s portrayed as a sad, unfulfilled loser who’s unhappy in his marriage (which, btw, includes a wife and a child). The biggest problem with his character is that he’s barely portrayed as a predator at all. He doesn’t groom Waldo. He doesn’t manipulate her. He doesn’t build trust or slowly blur boundaries. Instead, Waldo initiates everything. He resists a bit, then just goes with the flow.
And what’s worse, later in the book it might feel like Mr. Korgy actually cares about Waldo, taking her on dates, risking his marriage, eventually admitting his “love.” The author presents him as a lost, pathetic man, rather than what he actually is.
But that’s not how it works in real life. Predators don’t “love.” They lust. They desire control, getting off by the power imbalance. By portraying Mr. Korgy the wrong way, the author turns a predator into a tragic romantic figure. I am afraid, a vulnerable teenage girl could read this book and walk away thinking that older men can truly love younger girls, that they’re not just there to use them. That alone makes this book dangerous.
Now let’s talk about Waldo. She’s 17, lives with her mother, no father in the picture. Of course. Her mother is immature, got pregnant as a teenager, and is still desperate for male validation. She’s emotionally absent, always disappearing on dates, forcing Waldo to grow up too fast and basically parent her own parent. That part actually makes sense. The author does a decent job portraying a broken family dynamic and how neglect affects a child.
My first issue with Waldo is that she’s too self-aware. Her inner monologues are far too mature. Yes, teenagers can be thoughtful and deep, but a lot of her thoughts feel like the author speaking through her, trying to sound profound. It completely broke the illusion of a real 17-year-old for me. Waldo lacks the confusion and messiness that actual teenagers have.
Waldo is also numb, empty, unfulfilled, seeks approval and struggles with daddy issues (which also makes sense). So here she sees Mr. Korgy and convinces herself that he is the answer to all of that. I could accept that if it came after manipulation, grooming, and emotional dependency. But no, the first time Waldo sees her teacher, she thinks, “my vagina pulsed.” She masturbates to his pictures. Fantasizes about him. She is completely obsessed.
And let me be clear, I stand by the thought that a minor is always a victim. Always. No matter what they do.
But there is a moment in the book where Waldo straddles her teacher, dry-humps him, sucks his fingers, and demands to fuck her while he’s begging her to stop. I am not excusing the teacher here, he is a grown ass man and could (must have) physically push her away.
And I see what the author (probably) was trying to do here. To portray a victim who doesn’t feel like a victim. A victim who is bold, lusting and pushing. So I don’t mind Waldo being disturbing or hypersexual. But written this way, the book feeds a disgusting idea: that teenage girls are freaks who just want to sleep with older men. A sick reader could easily use this book to justify that belief.
This story could have worked if the author just added a small detail. For example: if Waldo had been sexually assaulted at a younger age by one of her mother’s boyfriends. That single detail would change everything. It would point out that some victims of SA can struggle with hypersexuality. It would add depth to the story. Then Mr. Korgy could have been written as an actual predator, someone who learns about Waldo's past, positions himself as her savior, builds trust, and exploits her vulnerability. That would show how predators really operate. And the ending could have focused on how the relationship with an older man affected Waldo by actually exploring her victimhood.
But the author didn’t want to do all that. By the second half of the book, I couldn’t even tell what the author was trying to say. Is this about neglect? Love addiction? Teenagers not knowing what they want? That Waldo just loved the chase and got bored once she got what she wanted? And if that’s the case, why make the age gap? Purely for shock value? To make the book seem edgy and deep, without actually engaging with the reality of abuse, power imbalance, or victimhood?
The author tried to explore too many things and ended up exploring nothing. Just played with provocative words and called it literature. Not every book needs a deep meaning. But if you choose to write about such a sensitive topic, do some research first. You don’t just throw in graphic scenes for shock and call it “bold” and thought-provoking.