What do you think?
Rate this book
The Black Monk
A woman haunted by family denial, secrets and a shadowy figure . . .
While her brother Cedric spirals into addiction, Alice Lidell finds herself confronted not only by his decline, but by memories of the past. From their chaotic Auckland childhood to her present day life, Alice is haunted by a mysterious figure she calls the Black Monk.
As Alice tries to hold her family together, the Black Monk appears in various a stranger met in a cemetery, a face on television, a character surfacing in her own writing.
Part psychological thriller, part family saga, this is a daring novel that examines the themes of the shame, addiction, truth and the stories we tell to survive.
While her brother Cedric spirals into addiction, Alice Lidell finds herself confronted not only by his decline, but by memories of the past. From their chaotic Auckland childhood to her present day life, Alice is haunted by a mysterious figure she calls the Black Monk.
As Alice tries to hold her family together, the Black Monk appears in various a stranger met in a cemetery, a face on television, a character surfacing in her own writing.
Part psychological thriller, part family saga, this is a daring novel that examines the themes of the shame, addiction, truth and the stories we tell to survive.
Kindle Edition
Published March 3, 2026
About the author
Charlotte Grimshaw
20 books64 followersCharlotte Grimshaw is the author of a number of critically acclaimed novels and outstanding collections of short stories. She has been a double finalist and prize winner in the Sunday Star-Times short story competition, and in 2006 she won the BNZ Katherine Mansfield Award. In 2007 she won a Book Council Six Pack prize. Her story collection Opportunity was shortlisted for the 2007 Frank O'Connor International Prize, and in 2008 Opportunity won New Zealand's premier Montana Award for Fiction or Poetry. She was also the 2008 Montana Book Reviewer of the Year. Her story collection Singularity was shortlisted for the 2009 Frank O'Connor International Prize and the South East Asia and Pacific section of the Commonwealth Writers' Prize. Grimshaw's fourth novel, The Night Book was shortlisted for the 2011 NZ Post Award. She writes a monthly column in Metro magazine, for which she won a 2009 Qantas Media Award.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 11 of 11 reviews
May 6, 2026
I recommend that readers going into this novel have a level of familiarity with Grimshaw, particularly her recent memoir, The Mirror Book, as well as Chekhov's story The Black Monk. This novel, is highly referential of the Chekhov, and intwined with Grimshaw's memoir, and locating it thus really enhanced my reading experience. There's a lot of obscurity in terms of the relationship between fact and fiction here, and a tolerance for that is also needed to enjoy this reading experience. As a long-term Grimshaw fan, I enjoyed being challenged by this.
March 8, 2026
Knowing that Charlotte Grimshaw’s new novel draws inspiration from the short story of the same name written by Anton Chekhov in 1893, I thought I would read that first in case it provided any insights. Andrey Kovrin, a scholar, is forced to take a break from his studies and stay in the countryside. Here he encounters the ghostly figure of a hooded monk. On their second meeting the monk sits next to him on a garden bench and they have the following conversation:
The back cover of Charlotte Grimshaw’s The Black Monk describes the novel as ‘Part psychological thriller and part family saga.’ I think this is underselling what we have here. My first reaction is that this is ‘meta-fiction’, an invitation to look deeper into layers of meaning and context. The book operates on so many different levels. When the main character in the novel is also writing a book called The Black Monk then we are definitely talking meta fiction.
Sometimes meta fiction will play with the timeline and with The Black Monk I paused after about forty pages to take stock of the way we were jumping about in time to see if I was missing something, or if we were just being disorientated. To begin with Alice Lidell is a kid growing up in Auckland, perhaps in the ‘70s or 80s. Her brother Cedric is picked on by the other boys at school and gets into cannabis when he is 16. He ‘had calmed down since he was young, but he’d been an alcoholic and drug user for decades.’ Lately he’d become obsessed by the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Alice goes to visit him in Wellington in 2022. All this information in a handful of pages as we jump back and forth.
Picking your way across the timeline, there are some events and characters that are significant, and some that you come to realise are just passing names. Alice becomes a writer of children’s fiction, and lives in London with her husband where she makes up stories for her daughter that she turns into books. Within the recent timespan of this novel she starts to write her first adult fiction, also called The Black Monk, which seems to refer to some of the events within her own life. It is at this point that we start to see some events which are really from her life (not forgetting that this is all fiction) and some events which may just be fiction within the fiction.
The Black Monk within this story first appears to Alice in Karori cemetery in Wellington:
This is the first appearance of Anton, a German shoe salesman. It seems significant because Alice lends him a scarf to stop his bleeding and when she later looks into the scrunched up bundle, it contains blood, flesh and a tooth. This proof that Anton was ‘real’ takes on greater importance and Alice hides in in her freezer until many years later she slips it into the coffin of her dead mother. At one point, as the millennium changes, she sees Anton again, this time on CNN, where he seems to have become the leader of the Russian nation and is delivering a New Year message to the Russian people.
One quote may, or may not, hold the key to this character. Alice is thinking about Chekhov’s story:
Alice’s parents figure heavily within the narrative. Their relationship with Alice is at best uneasy. Her mother, Rula, is an artist and her step-father is a politician, Thom, later Sir Thom. For those familiar with other novels by Grimshaw, there are plenty of fictional politicians in there too. The Night Book sees David Hallwright as the leader of the National party and in Soon he has become Prime Minister. Starlight Peninsula also contains Hallwright and The Bad Seed is a volume that brings all these stories together and was adapted for TV. In these novels Hallwright’s wife was name Rosa, only one letter different from Rula.
There are several references to other authors and their works, such as Joan Didion and Martin Amis. Catherine Chidgey gets a whole page of description about her ‘found’ novel The Beat of the Pendulum. But towards the end of the book there is reference to ‘the celebrated New Zealand writer J.G. Stein’. This is obviously a thinly disguised reference to the author’s father, C.J. Stead. That brings us to the difficult subject of family in the story, and family for Grimshaw. I haven’t read her 2021 memoir called The Mirror Book, which was shortlisted for the Ockham Book awards, but there was plenty of buzz about what was said about her parents. At one point they even threatened to take her to court over the revelations. Grimshaw found her own parents indifferent or actively hostile to her own pain or problems. She describes ‘a deep-seated commitment to fiction over truth’, and claims that her parents ‘re-wrote their own history’ describing ‘the lovely childhood house full of books’ narrative when it fact the reality was a chaotic, frightening and lawless youth.
Grimshaw, like Alice in the book, also had an older brother. There are many parallels here too. Both the character Cedric and real brother Oliver lived in Wellington, they were music lovers, they both had multiple degrees and both struggled with addition and alcoholism. Beyond that there are probably other similarities locked into the author’s private life and memory. Grimshaw describes long phone conversations with her brother and in the novel Cedric and Alice enjoy the same, both were full of laughter.
And finally let’s not forget, Alice Lidell, with two d’s not one, was the real young girl that Lewis Carroll used as the inspiration for Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland. Just another level of the meta.
‘You’re just a mirage,’ Kovrin murmured. ‘Why are you here, sitting still like that? It doesn’t tally with the legend.’
‘Never mind,’ the monk answered softly after a brief pause, turning his face towards him. ‘The legend, myself, the mirage are all products of your overheated imagination. I’m an apparition…’
‘That means you don’t exist?’ Kovrin asked.
‘Think what you like,’ the monk said with a weak smile. ‘I exist in your imagination, and your imagination is part of nature, so I exist in nature too.’
The back cover of Charlotte Grimshaw’s The Black Monk describes the novel as ‘Part psychological thriller and part family saga.’ I think this is underselling what we have here. My first reaction is that this is ‘meta-fiction’, an invitation to look deeper into layers of meaning and context. The book operates on so many different levels. When the main character in the novel is also writing a book called The Black Monk then we are definitely talking meta fiction.
Sometimes meta fiction will play with the timeline and with The Black Monk I paused after about forty pages to take stock of the way we were jumping about in time to see if I was missing something, or if we were just being disorientated. To begin with Alice Lidell is a kid growing up in Auckland, perhaps in the ‘70s or 80s. Her brother Cedric is picked on by the other boys at school and gets into cannabis when he is 16. He ‘had calmed down since he was young, but he’d been an alcoholic and drug user for decades.’ Lately he’d become obsessed by the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Alice goes to visit him in Wellington in 2022. All this information in a handful of pages as we jump back and forth.
Picking your way across the timeline, there are some events and characters that are significant, and some that you come to realise are just passing names. Alice becomes a writer of children’s fiction, and lives in London with her husband where she makes up stories for her daughter that she turns into books. Within the recent timespan of this novel she starts to write her first adult fiction, also called The Black Monk, which seems to refer to some of the events within her own life. It is at this point that we start to see some events which are really from her life (not forgetting that this is all fiction) and some events which may just be fiction within the fiction.
The Black Monk within this story first appears to Alice in Karori cemetery in Wellington:
A figure emerged from a clump of trees and came towards her through the graves: the shape of a man in black, cut out of the air.
His gait was awkward. He kept his right arm stiffly by his side and held his other hand to his face. Drawing nearer, he tripped but righted himself.
She saw blood running over the hand he held to his mouth. His shirt was stained with spots of red. He saw her and made as if to veer away, but when she stood up and asked if he was all right, he changed his mind. He reeled, closed his eyes. She could see he was dizzy, concussed maybe.
Alice could recall, as if she was writing a story, what they managed to convey to one another, even though she remembered it only broadly, and his spoken English was very limited.
This is the first appearance of Anton, a German shoe salesman. It seems significant because Alice lends him a scarf to stop his bleeding and when she later looks into the scrunched up bundle, it contains blood, flesh and a tooth. This proof that Anton was ‘real’ takes on greater importance and Alice hides in in her freezer until many years later she slips it into the coffin of her dead mother. At one point, as the millennium changes, she sees Anton again, this time on CNN, where he seems to have become the leader of the Russian nation and is delivering a New Year message to the Russian people.
One quote may, or may not, hold the key to this character. Alice is thinking about Chekhov’s story:
In Chekov’s story, a man starts seeing a black figure in the air, a hallucination. When the monk appears, the man feels insane but happy. When he stops seeing the monk, he’s sane but miserable. What can this mean?
Perhaps it means he needs his madness. His madness is the only thing keeping him sane.
What if, for Alice, the black monk didn’t represent madness but fictionalising? Her black monk was a shapeshifter; he appeared and disappeared, he existed in a no man’s land between fiction and fact. As far as she knew, he never told the truth, he made his own reality. He was the shape of a man cut out of the universe, revealing the blackness beyond.
Alice’s parents figure heavily within the narrative. Their relationship with Alice is at best uneasy. Her mother, Rula, is an artist and her step-father is a politician, Thom, later Sir Thom. For those familiar with other novels by Grimshaw, there are plenty of fictional politicians in there too. The Night Book sees David Hallwright as the leader of the National party and in Soon he has become Prime Minister. Starlight Peninsula also contains Hallwright and The Bad Seed is a volume that brings all these stories together and was adapted for TV. In these novels Hallwright’s wife was name Rosa, only one letter different from Rula.
There are several references to other authors and their works, such as Joan Didion and Martin Amis. Catherine Chidgey gets a whole page of description about her ‘found’ novel The Beat of the Pendulum. But towards the end of the book there is reference to ‘the celebrated New Zealand writer J.G. Stein’. This is obviously a thinly disguised reference to the author’s father, C.J. Stead. That brings us to the difficult subject of family in the story, and family for Grimshaw. I haven’t read her 2021 memoir called The Mirror Book, which was shortlisted for the Ockham Book awards, but there was plenty of buzz about what was said about her parents. At one point they even threatened to take her to court over the revelations. Grimshaw found her own parents indifferent or actively hostile to her own pain or problems. She describes ‘a deep-seated commitment to fiction over truth’, and claims that her parents ‘re-wrote their own history’ describing ‘the lovely childhood house full of books’ narrative when it fact the reality was a chaotic, frightening and lawless youth.
Grimshaw, like Alice in the book, also had an older brother. There are many parallels here too. Both the character Cedric and real brother Oliver lived in Wellington, they were music lovers, they both had multiple degrees and both struggled with addition and alcoholism. Beyond that there are probably other similarities locked into the author’s private life and memory. Grimshaw describes long phone conversations with her brother and in the novel Cedric and Alice enjoy the same, both were full of laughter.
And finally let’s not forget, Alice Lidell, with two d’s not one, was the real young girl that Lewis Carroll used as the inspiration for Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland. Just another level of the meta.
April 4, 2026
4.5 stars - more to come.
April 11, 2026
Unsettling, confusing, switching of time, what is reality and what is fiction? Autobiographical elements, especially in the characters. I wanted more of the reality of the family, and more plot rather than the imaginary, dreamlike stuff of Alice’s novel writing. My least favourite Grimshaw offering.
March 30, 2026
I think the book flowed well with its language and sentences. The plot was a bit scattered, but this was explained sufficiently so ultimately I didn’t mind. I sometimes forgot who characters were as they went away and then popped up again a lot later in the book. Plot points were rehashed often.
It’s difficult to describe autobiographical fiction. I have a tendency to believe it’s self indulgent and while Grimshaw describes the autobiographical elements throughout the book, it veers on the side of both the self indulgent but also observable universal interest. I believe she achieved this from sometimes gothic, sometimes dreamy prose, which became more than just the words on the page.
The book sort of evolved as it progressed and possibly transcended into something other than its beginning. I would recommend it to fans of more abstract literary fiction.
It’s difficult to describe autobiographical fiction. I have a tendency to believe it’s self indulgent and while Grimshaw describes the autobiographical elements throughout the book, it veers on the side of both the self indulgent but also observable universal interest. I believe she achieved this from sometimes gothic, sometimes dreamy prose, which became more than just the words on the page.
The book sort of evolved as it progressed and possibly transcended into something other than its beginning. I would recommend it to fans of more abstract literary fiction.
April 22, 2026
You know a book is bad when your book club all collectively hate it!
Honestly, I thought I was just not smart enough to understand what was going on in this book. Turns out none of us did! There are elements of this book that are good - the description of alcoholism and how it impacts families was very well done, the book was very easy to read, and initially I was very intrigued by the concept of the black monk. But whatever she was trying to do really flopped. Random characters would pop up willy nilly and have no impact on the story and never seen again, the various timelines were difficult to follow, and in the end I couldn’t actually tell you what this book is about. Someone aptly described this as a book she has written as a form of self therapy, a stream of conscious style book, it might make sense to her but it doesn’t to anyone else.
There are some good bones in this book - the black monk concept was intriguing in the start but ultimately didn’t develop into anything of interest. Disappointing.
Honestly, I thought I was just not smart enough to understand what was going on in this book. Turns out none of us did! There are elements of this book that are good - the description of alcoholism and how it impacts families was very well done, the book was very easy to read, and initially I was very intrigued by the concept of the black monk. But whatever she was trying to do really flopped. Random characters would pop up willy nilly and have no impact on the story and never seen again, the various timelines were difficult to follow, and in the end I couldn’t actually tell you what this book is about. Someone aptly described this as a book she has written as a form of self therapy, a stream of conscious style book, it might make sense to her but it doesn’t to anyone else.
There are some good bones in this book - the black monk concept was intriguing in the start but ultimately didn’t develop into anything of interest. Disappointing.
April 22, 2026
I tried to get invested in this novel, dutifully listening to the opinions of readers who saw merit in what was attempted, but all this Jungian shadow stuff is not for me. It's fiction, yet it seems like a thinly veiled autobiography. I struggled with what was "real" and what "imagined", why I should care about the disappearing / reappearing bracelet, the momentous mementoes and a bloody tooth in a freezer.
Maybe it would have helped to be familiar with either The Mirror Book or Chekov's Black Monk short story - I don't know, but even worse, I don't care.
Maybe it would have helped to be familiar with either The Mirror Book or Chekov's Black Monk short story - I don't know, but even worse, I don't care.
April 6, 2026
Reading this I constantly thought back to Charlotte Grimshaw's memoir 'The Mirror Book.' Her family are everywhere in this book, not just herself, but also her mother and her brother in particular. We are presumably expected to see a link between fiction and biography as the main character is called Alice Lidell, a reference to the Alice in Wonderland, where the Alice in the book was drawn from the real life Alice Liddell. I was often confused while I read; there is no linear plot, timelines move, there is no certainty, reality is blurred. Everything is ambiguous and unsettling. It is not for everyone, but I really enjoyed it.
March 28, 2026
there was too much repetition for my liking. perhaps hindered by the fact that i read this in three sittings so the details were fresh in my mind
April 1, 2026
Spiralling, messy, repetitive, obviously disguised characters for her family. Some sentences cliched.
April 3, 2026
Confusing, repetitive and disjointed. I kept hoping that it might eventually make sense but sadly not
Displaying 1 - 11 of 11 reviews