رؤية كابوسية من الواقع اليومي لزوجة وأم أمريكية من الطبقة المتوسطة، تغمرها الفوضى المتزايدة في منزلها، مُحاطة بالأوساخ وبقايا الحياة اليومية. في محاولاتها لتنظيم هذه الفوضى تحلم بتنظيف «الكون» بأكمله وترتيبه من «الإنتروبيا الكونية» التي تقود كل شيء نحو الفوضى والتدهور.
داخل هذه المساحة المنزلية، تُقدَّم حياتها كما لو كانت «تجربة علمية». ونجد أنفسنا مدعوين لنكون مشاهدين لمعاناتها الخاصة، وتأمل مصير كلٍّ من الكون وحياتها المنزلية.
قد لا تبدو قصة «الموت الحراري للكون» للوهلة الأولى خيالًا علميًّا على الإطلاق؛ فهي لا تحتوي على وحوش ذات عيون جاحظة، أو رحلات بين الكواكب، أو عوالم ما بعد نهاية العالَم، أو عجائب تكنولوجية، إنها لا تُركِّز على الفضاء «الخارجي» بقدر ما تُركِّز على الفضاء «الداخلي» لبطلة القصة، التي تشعر بـ«الموت الحراري» الخاص بها، حيث تنظر إلى «الفوضى» كدليل على تفكك عالمها وعقلها.
نوع مختلف من القصص ذات بنية «تجريبية»، تتميز بأسلوب سرد مُجَزَّأ وغير خطي، تتداخل المشاهد الواقعية لحياة بطلتها مع تعليقات فلسفية وعلمية عشوائية حول الفلك، والفيزياء، وطبيعة الوجود، وعلى القراء فك رموز كل فقرة وعبارة، بل حتى كل كلمة، لبناء عالَم النص وبالتالي فهمه.
تُعَد هذه القصة رمزًا لـ«موجة الخيال العلمي الجديدة»، التي ركزت على استكشاف العوالم «الداخلية» والتجريب الشكلي في الأساليب السردية.
“35. Sarah Boyle has at times felt a unity with her body, at other times a complete separation. The mind/body duality considered. The time/space duality considered. The male/female duality considered. The matter/ energy duality considered. Sometimes, at extremes, her Body seems to her an animal on a leash, taken for walks in the park by her Mind. […] 36. Housework is never completed, the chaos always lurks ready to encroach on any area left unweeded, a jungle filled with dirty pans and the roaring of giant stuffed toy animals suddenly turned savage. Terrible glass eyes.”
⭐️4 A very engaging read for one of my Master’s classes analysing early examples of feminist science fiction.
Structurally, I found it really interesting, especially the way the domestic sphere is broken up and reframed through scientific terminology. The domestic overpowers the scientific, taking up space literally and narratively. This is all done in a really cohesive way, the integration is thoughtful and effective.
There’s a heavy use of imagery and symbolism throughout. The title itself carries a double meaning - scientific and social - for the female main character. I found the recurring ‘Russian doll’ imagery particularly engaging. It acts as a powerful representation of reproduction, the continuation of oppression, and deep, generational female rage. I also loved the symbol of the ‘glass eyes’ signifying the disconnect between inner and outer realities, and the main character’s (as well as a wider feminine) loss of self.
The short story ends with a chaotic and ambiguous crescendo, but not an unexpected one. We've seen ‘The Heat Death of the Universe’ unravel throughout, building toward this clattering, destructive conclusion. I'm excited to explore this text further in my studies!
So when Ballard did this in 'The Atrocity Exhibition' I was bamboozled, trying to make narrative sense of it. I'm glad that I read that before I read this. Ballard taught me to give up all pre-conceived notions of the novel form, or any other recognisable literary form, which made it easier to read this very clever and interesting short story (although I use that term loosely). A female response to Ballard's intensely male and misogynistic Avant-garde approach? Possibly, but I think it does something more interesting than just write back to the male perspective.
*not adding read dates b/c I don't want a 10 page story clogging up my book goal*
The material in Monster, She Wrote about female pulp horror/sci-fi writers unlocked a hidden memory of this story I read as a teenager in one of my parents' old sci-fi anthologies and I just had to go read it again. As a teen I thought it was pretty weird but kinda cool. As an adult I think it's one of the best short stories ever written.
Quite uncomfortable and difficult to read due to the format. Sort of reads like a screenplay, though not in a positive sense.
"Sarah Boyle is never quite sure how many children she has" (31).
I didn't really enjoy reading it. It might be said that the importance and relevance of the story were lost on me, I don't know. I'm just not all that impressed by the content.
Another one read for my sci-fi class (will these reviews of super short stories ever stop? No, no they won't sorry). Unique story, and story structure. It was thought-provoking, especially the descent into madness by the mother figure. Didn't blow my mind, but still enjoyed it.
This story is part of a curated, scifi-thematic, challenge read that I programmed. https://www.goodreads.com/review/list... Let me know if you take me up on it!