Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Web Writing: Why and How for Liberal Arts Teaching and Learning

Rate this book
The essays in "Web Writing" respond to contemporary debates over the proper role of the Internet in higher education, steering a middle course between polarized attitudes that often dominate the conversation. The authors argue for the wise integration of web tools into what the liberal arts does best: writing across the curriculum. All academic disciplines value clear and compelling prose, whether that prose comes in the shape of a persuasive essay, scientific report, or creative expression. The act of writing visually demonstrates how we think in original and critical ways and in ways that are deeper than those that can be taught or assessed by a computer. Furthermore, learning to write well requires engaged readers who encourage and challenge us to revise our muddled first drafts and craft more distinctive and informed points of view. Indeed, a new generation of web-based tools for authoring, annotating, editing, and publishing can dramatically enrich the writing process, but doing so requires liberal arts educators to rethink why and how we teach this skill, and to question those who blindly call for embracing or rejecting technology.

280 pages, Paperback

First published March 28, 2015

7 people are currently reading
15 people want to read

About the author

Jack Dougherty

7 books1 follower

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
1 (33%)
4 stars
1 (33%)
3 stars
1 (33%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Araminta Matthews.
Author 18 books57 followers
October 1, 2015
I bookmarked at least 25% of the chapters in this book as new, innovative, or revealing concepts in the world of web-writing and rhetoric. I was deeply impressed with some of the ways pedagogues used Wikipedia as both an authoring tool and a social-construction tool for exposing the under-representation of minorities in the Wikiverse (largely as a result of their insistence on all sources being popular citations, which is a reflexive exercise of the popular-reinforcing-the-popular, or perhaps, of history books reprinting history books instead of researching new history books). There were some interesting approaches in here.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.