What do you think?
Rate this book
Age and Guile Beat Youth,Innocence,and a Bad Haircut; 1970-1995: 25 Years of P. J. O'Rouke
Libro usado en buenas condiciones, por su antiguedad podria contener señales normales de uso
344 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1995
68 people are currently reading
340 people want to read
About the author
P.J. O'Rourke
129 books514 followersPatrick Jake "P. J." O'Rourke is an American political satirist, journalist, writer, and author. O'Rourke is the H. L. Mencken Research Fellow at the Cato Institute and is a regular correspondent for The Atlantic Monthly, The American Spectator, and The Weekly Standard, and frequent panelist on National Public Radio's game show Wait Wait... Don't Tell Me!. Since 2011 O'Rourke has been a columnist at The Daily Beast. In the United Kingdom, he is known as the face of a long-running series of television advertisements for British Airways in the 1990s.
He is the author of 20 books, of which his latest, The Baby Boom: How It Got That Way (And It Wasn’t My Fault) (And I’ll Never Do It Again), was released January 2014. This was preceded on September 21, 2010, by Don't Vote! – It Just Encourages the Bastards, and on September 1, 2009, Driving Like Crazy with a reprint edition published on May 11, 2010. According to a 60 Minutes profile, he is also the most quoted living man in The Penguin Dictionary of Modern Humorous Quotations.
He is the author of 20 books, of which his latest, The Baby Boom: How It Got That Way (And It Wasn’t My Fault) (And I’ll Never Do It Again), was released January 2014. This was preceded on September 21, 2010, by Don't Vote! – It Just Encourages the Bastards, and on September 1, 2009, Driving Like Crazy with a reprint edition published on May 11, 2010. According to a 60 Minutes profile, he is also the most quoted living man in The Penguin Dictionary of Modern Humorous Quotations.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 61 reviews
July 25, 2011
My favourite of his books. The piece "Why I Invaded Cambodia by Richard Milhous Nixon as told to PJ O'Rourke" is one of the funniest things I have ever read.
November 24, 2013
This would be a two star deal if it had been read instead of audiobooked. After years of meaning to dip into O'Rourke, because of a Troy Patterson recommendation and a thinking that his "wit" might provide me with some tidbits to steal and jam into my own conversations I finally took this on after a great experience with Fear and Loathing at Rolling Stone in which HST references P.J. multiple times due to their both being writers for the magazine.
There's a personal bit in the beginning and a piece on his tenure at a socialist alt-weekly that are good, and his surf fishing, woodcock hunting, and golf pieces are interesting enough, but the wordplay didn't live up to my expectations. He's clever sure, but also very tiresome and with the exception of "drink myself blind" my smiles were restrained and always a touch queazy. Maybe his more recent stuff is better, but I didn't know where to start. The articles for Automobile Magazine are probably the low point of the book. I heard an interview on NPR with him awhile ago, and assumed he would be more "on" in the printed form but he was exactly the same so maybe try that out first. Goodness knows I try to avoid The Awl and it's ilk, but at least they and the rest of the internet have raised the benchmark for sharpish writing and deadline wit from where it was when these pieces were earning P.J. decent money.
There's a personal bit in the beginning and a piece on his tenure at a socialist alt-weekly that are good, and his surf fishing, woodcock hunting, and golf pieces are interesting enough, but the wordplay didn't live up to my expectations. He's clever sure, but also very tiresome and with the exception of "drink myself blind" my smiles were restrained and always a touch queazy. Maybe his more recent stuff is better, but I didn't know where to start. The articles for Automobile Magazine are probably the low point of the book. I heard an interview on NPR with him awhile ago, and assumed he would be more "on" in the printed form but he was exactly the same so maybe try that out first. Goodness knows I try to avoid The Awl and it's ilk, but at least they and the rest of the internet have raised the benchmark for sharpish writing and deadline wit from where it was when these pieces were earning P.J. decent money.
August 25, 2011
P.J. O'Rourke is one of the best political satire writers.
Back in the 80's and 90's I'd read some of his musings in magazines and enjoyed his humor. His 'gonzo' style of writing was quite popular in those days. I was going through my library the other day, and grabbed it to read whenever I'm in the bathroom. I shouldn't have, as I now find myself spending far too much time in there.
The cover on my book is different, as you can see below. My edition is hardcover.
Back in the 80's and 90's I'd read some of his musings in magazines and enjoyed his humor. His 'gonzo' style of writing was quite popular in those days. I was going through my library the other day, and grabbed it to read whenever I'm in the bathroom. I shouldn't have, as I now find myself spending far too much time in there.
The cover on my book is different, as you can see below. My edition is hardcover.
February 22, 2015
Didn't really enjoy this one. P. J. O'Rourke's early stuff is a little too raw and unbalanced. The later pieces were pretty good.
February 11, 2008
First and foremost: it is worth noting (and it pains an saddens me that this is the case) that the phrase "Youth, Innocence, and a Bad Haircut" is the first time I have seen a three-item list with correct grammar in a book printed in America after World War II.
Second, and not quite so foremost: P. J. O'Rourke is a very, very funny guy. He is completely politically incorrect, in most cases, and is therefore more than happy to pull out the jokes, puns, and other humorous concepts his more liberal colleagues have left to the dust.
Third, and not really far up there on the scale, but still worth mentioning: in most ways, P. J. O'Rourke is a tremendous boon to the right-wing American. He's not afraid to take pot-shots at just about anything, including fellow members of the right (Pat Buchanan is roasted almost as often as Bill Clinton), and he's not afraid to admit his mistakes, such as endorsing Clinton in 1992.
Combine those, and for most of this book you have a tremendously funny read, an almost literary roasting of such things as book tours, drinking, stupid sports, Whitewater, various makes and models of automobile, and the like. Unfortunately, it's the part that falls outside the realm of "most" that keeps this from being one of the finest political collections of the past decade. There are times when O'Rourke, who seems to be sitting right on the Libertarian partyline, veers far off to the left, and if he is to be trusted he was stuck out there in at least one case by the head of the Cato Institute (making me wonder how Libertarian they truly are), and he also has many of the strange and illogical hang-ups that keep me from ever wanting to vote Republican. He also, and he is well aware of it, asks a lot of our indulgence in the book's second section, a collection of short stories published (well, most of them) in the National Lampoon during his tenure as editor in chief there. Anyone who still wonders why I abhor the very idea of self-publishing need only read the section "The Truth About the Sixties and Other Fictions" in this book. It's shameless, awful, contorted, constipated prose, and O'Rourke is fully aware of this, and even says so in a few places.
But if you skip that section, and immediately stop reading any time you find one of those places where conservatives suddenly dismiss anything relating to logic (I have often theorized it's remnants of too many drugs during the sixties), this is most definitely a worthwhile book. Both the automobile and sports sections brought forth guffaws. And if you've ever heard me guffaw, you'll know that's soemthing to stay away from.
Second, and not quite so foremost: P. J. O'Rourke is a very, very funny guy. He is completely politically incorrect, in most cases, and is therefore more than happy to pull out the jokes, puns, and other humorous concepts his more liberal colleagues have left to the dust.
Third, and not really far up there on the scale, but still worth mentioning: in most ways, P. J. O'Rourke is a tremendous boon to the right-wing American. He's not afraid to take pot-shots at just about anything, including fellow members of the right (Pat Buchanan is roasted almost as often as Bill Clinton), and he's not afraid to admit his mistakes, such as endorsing Clinton in 1992.
Combine those, and for most of this book you have a tremendously funny read, an almost literary roasting of such things as book tours, drinking, stupid sports, Whitewater, various makes and models of automobile, and the like. Unfortunately, it's the part that falls outside the realm of "most" that keeps this from being one of the finest political collections of the past decade. There are times when O'Rourke, who seems to be sitting right on the Libertarian partyline, veers far off to the left, and if he is to be trusted he was stuck out there in at least one case by the head of the Cato Institute (making me wonder how Libertarian they truly are), and he also has many of the strange and illogical hang-ups that keep me from ever wanting to vote Republican. He also, and he is well aware of it, asks a lot of our indulgence in the book's second section, a collection of short stories published (well, most of them) in the National Lampoon during his tenure as editor in chief there. Anyone who still wonders why I abhor the very idea of self-publishing need only read the section "The Truth About the Sixties and Other Fictions" in this book. It's shameless, awful, contorted, constipated prose, and O'Rourke is fully aware of this, and even says so in a few places.
But if you skip that section, and immediately stop reading any time you find one of those places where conservatives suddenly dismiss anything relating to logic (I have often theorized it's remnants of too many drugs during the sixties), this is most definitely a worthwhile book. Both the automobile and sports sections brought forth guffaws. And if you've ever heard me guffaw, you'll know that's soemthing to stay away from.
January 5, 2008
Political humorist P.J. O'Rourke was once a knee jerk, card-carrying, pot smoking, hippie liberal. Now he's more of a libertarian, but he re-lives those former days in this book. Some of the book is a little unpalatable, like all of those (often sexually explicit) excerpts from his fictional writings produced in those liberal days. But some of the book is funny, particularly his commentary on those very writings. The articles selected from numerous automobile magazines, however, grew a little dull for me, even if they are occasionally interspersed with some clever, cutting humor. Overall it's a pretty good work because O'Rourke is a very good writer, but it doesn't hold a candle to his other books, and in that respect, Age and Guile is a disappointment. I will say, however, that his spoof of modern poetry (or what might possibly be his serious past attempts at it) is absolutely hilarious. I especially enjoyed his "poem on nothing at all."
April 14, 2022
The career of one of great American boomer humorists from hippie to conservative. I suspect that both hippie and conservative were protective coloration he took on to survive as a writer in a changing world. California hippies I knew back in the day wouldn't recognized him as brother, and Arizona conservatives these days would find him too liberal. Either way he managed to get paid to write funny stuff that was often insightful. And honest in a way that you can't be if you're being "serious." I especially value his essays about Mexico.
August 24, 2018
It took me forever to finish this book. Why? I love the work of humorists. O’Rourke is funny. He is both self-deprecating and satirical. But, there was a dark undertone that kept bothering me in this compilation of essays, mostly from the 1990’s. About half way through the collection, I figured out what was bugging me. The first few essays could be summarized as, “I drank a lot. I smoked a lot of weed. I woke up with my head in a toilet.” Fine. He had fun(?) in the 60’s and 70’s. The book went on to include some hilariously written car reviews and adventures related to evaluating cars under extreme circumstances. Then, on to the politics of the 1990’s. The essays quit making me laugh. I certainly do not agree with O’Rourke’s libertarian views, which seem to lean to the extreme. He explicitly denounces the concept of the common good. Yeah, he lost me right there.
This book cracked open a mystery that has confounded me. How does a free-wheeling hippie from the 1960’s turn into the grumpy, Fox News watching curmudgeon of the 2010’s? I could ascertain that on one level a counter-culture lifestyle of drugs, alcohol and promiscuous sex was the ultimate middle-finger to authority. O’Rourke took that same attitude and polished it into a more respectable, though somewhat heartless, disregard for governmental authority under the guise of libertarianism. A less polished communicator becomes the crazy old uncle screaming for government to keep its hands off his Medicare.
But, O’Rourke is funny. His use of similes is phenomenal. I’ll probably read more of his work. But, probably it will be when I want to argue with someone in my head.
This book cracked open a mystery that has confounded me. How does a free-wheeling hippie from the 1960’s turn into the grumpy, Fox News watching curmudgeon of the 2010’s? I could ascertain that on one level a counter-culture lifestyle of drugs, alcohol and promiscuous sex was the ultimate middle-finger to authority. O’Rourke took that same attitude and polished it into a more respectable, though somewhat heartless, disregard for governmental authority under the guise of libertarianism. A less polished communicator becomes the crazy old uncle screaming for government to keep its hands off his Medicare.
But, O’Rourke is funny. His use of similes is phenomenal. I’ll probably read more of his work. But, probably it will be when I want to argue with someone in my head.
May 16, 2009
Rather than have some muck-raker dig up dirt from his liberal past, conservative political humorist P.J. O'Rourke, beat them to the punch by publishing many of his early pieces, going all the way back to the sparodically published newspaper called Harvey. (He says they only published when they needed more money for marijuanna.)
The result is a fun view of his life throughout the years, with a few surprises tossed in, such as a relatively tender foreword written for the anniversary publication of Emily Post's book on etiquette. Also included is a drop dead funny piece on however you look at it--conservative, or liberal--adding flouride to the water will drive your kids to communism, and a bit on 100 Reasons Why Jimmy Carter was a Better President than Bill Clinton.
The result is a fun view of his life throughout the years, with a few surprises tossed in, such as a relatively tender foreword written for the anniversary publication of Emily Post's book on etiquette. Also included is a drop dead funny piece on however you look at it--conservative, or liberal--adding flouride to the water will drive your kids to communism, and a bit on 100 Reasons Why Jimmy Carter was a Better President than Bill Clinton.
February 3, 2009
I was hoping to find out how he went from a silly hippie to a silly libertarian, but every autobiographical piece in here was so filthy I gave up reading it. There were two very good pieces in there, one was about why liberal education is so cool (written for Esquire or GQ or something). And the other was a foreward to an edition of Emily Post of all things. Both were wonderfully written and I still think about them and wish I hadn't had to wade through the Stephen King-like nastiness of poor P.J.'s life.
July 11, 2017
I like his style of writing and the stories he wrote on this book.
Favorite quote:
"People said they were a perfect couple. Perhaps they were. They were a little too vivid, like all perfect things, and like all perfect things they were destined for destruction. (And it is invariably satisfying to note that all perfect things are destined for destruction. Unfortunately, all imperfect things are destined for destruction also.)"
Favorite quote:
"People said they were a perfect couple. Perhaps they were. They were a little too vivid, like all perfect things, and like all perfect things they were destined for destruction. (And it is invariably satisfying to note that all perfect things are destined for destruction. Unfortunately, all imperfect things are destined for destruction also.)"
August 14, 2009
P.J.'s story of his own political transformation from a long-haired, leftist liberal with penchant for indulging in "recreational drugs" and young women, into a cynical, world-wise conservative with an affinity for fast cars, alcohol, cigars, and young women; as told with his typical insight coupled with laugh-out-loud humor.
June 29, 2013
P J In confessional mode circumscribes his ascent (Descent? Whatever) from spaced out space cadet with an attitude to raving red meat Republican / Libertarian. Delivered with his customary bludgeon like wit, it's a classic for those of us who always thought there was something screwy with the world.
September 21, 2018
While I did greatly enjoy P.J.'s style and general turn of phrase, I found his dismissive tone and constant use of poorly constructed logical strawmen (humorous as they may have been) to ridicule opinions that differed from his (self-admittedly) poorly informed opinions to be disastrously distracting once past the halfway mark. It essentially ruined the book for me.
September 15, 2009
I liked him better with the bad hair cut before he got too conservative to find anything nice to say. If you don't have anything nice to say...vote Republican, I guess. Still, the man can string some words together nicely.
April 9, 2009
Not PJ's best book, but great essays from his past. It's funny to read through his essays and watch his transformation from a dirty unwashed hippy left winger into a clean cut yuppy right winger throughout the course of his years.
May 11, 2010
This is one of my favorite books of all time. It's just a wonderful look into this very funny satirist's perspective of himself growing up. You see how he's lived as a lot of things, and how it's shaped him into who he is today.
Love this book. Can't say it enough.
Love this book. Can't say it enough.
March 30, 2007
It's amazing watching O'Rourke's transition from super leftwing hippie liberal to conservative republican through these essays.
June 29, 2007
Included some early attempts of O'Rourke to write fiction.
September 21, 2007
"...and best of all, we had a case of dynamite".
January 24, 2008
i loved this book. it had everything from his early stuff to his late stuff, and everything in between. true, there were some repeats, but that was fine with me.
July 15, 2008
Before ego, cigar, still pompous.
July 16, 2008
has one truly hysterical essay
January 11, 2009
I haven't read any PJ O'Rourke in a long time. I wonder if he has anything new out.
February 10, 2009
A lot of filler, but a few suitably rip-roaring moment nevertheless.
January 15, 2018
Fun to read the transformation, though I almost didn't make it through the early years.
November 25, 2009
If you don't like P.J. O'Rourke, I don't know if we can be friends.
September 26, 2011
The stuff about cars and politics I could take or leave, but the essays about his lazy days as a hard drinking, dope smoking hippie are hysterical and worth the price of admission.
March 19, 2012
O'Rourke is a very funny writer, and most of his books are worth reading. I enjoyed parts of this book, but it is not his best work
Displaying 1 - 30 of 61 reviews