Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Reading the Book of Nature: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science

Rate this book
This is an introductory survey to the philosophy of science suitable for beginners and nonspecialists. Its point of departure is the question: why should we believe what science tells us about the world? In this attempt to justify the claims of science the book treats such topics as observation data, confirmation of theories, and the explanation of phenomena. The writing is clear and concrete with detailed examples drawn from contemporary science: solar neutrinos, the gravitational bending of light, and the creation/evolution debate, for example. What emerges is a view of science in which observation relies on theory to give it meaning and credibility, while theory relies on observation for its motivation and validation. It is shown that this reciprocal support is not circular since the theory used to support a particular observation is independent of the theory for which the observation serves as evidence.

212 pages, Paperback

First published July 28, 1992

5 people are currently reading
43 people want to read

About the author

Peter Kosso

10 books3 followers

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
7 (16%)
4 stars
14 (33%)
3 stars
11 (26%)
2 stars
9 (21%)
1 star
1 (2%)
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews
Profile Image for Anja.
22 reviews2 followers
August 10, 2023
This could have been a 10 pages brochure. But you get an additional 210 pages of pompous and lengthy nothingness.
Profile Image for isabelle.
219 reviews
December 11, 2025
theory of knowledge core
makes me want to play heaven's vault again. unfortunately that game is just as boring as this book :P (not horrific by philosophy standards, but very long winded and repetitive)
Profile Image for Lara.
185 reviews10 followers
January 21, 2019
This book was far too long, and as Thomas wrote, really should have been a short pamphlet. The professors teaching the course admitted to not liking the text, which is also alarming. The philosophy of science is important and should be integrated with some historical background, not just lofty examples. I am interested in the subjects the book covered, but only felt less informed by the end of the book.
Profile Image for Jeff.
67 reviews10 followers
November 4, 2025
I have to say, out of the half-dozen or so books on philosophy of science that I've read, this is the best so far. Kosso, who teaches philosophy at Northern Arizona University, has written an outstanding introduction to POS which is different from most others on the subject. He takes a non-traditional approach to the subject (for traditional approaches, see three others as examples: Theory & Reality, by Peter Godfrey-Smith; Philosophy of Science, by Geoffrey Graham; and Philosophy of Science: A Very Short Introduction, by S. Okasha). I really like the way Kosso describes and explains in clear and understandable terms exactly what philosophy of science is. This is one book I highly recommend to everyone.
Profile Image for Thomas Haaland.
134 reviews2 followers
February 2, 2016
Some useful perspectives, but waaay to wordy. Could and should have been a 20 page pamphlet.
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.