This was a shockingly bad book. It didn't work on any level and I'm really appalled that his editors let it go out like this. The story is super weak, it read like bad fanfic, and the level of sexism in this book is simply off the charts.
Look, I admit it didn't start off good for me. This guy is so full of himself, he had me completely irritated before I even started the book. As usual, he went on and on about all of the awards he's won in his acknowledgements and in his bio at the end of the book. The bio is two pages of patting himself on the back because he's "just plain powerful." Robert Silverberg has a Nebula, a couple of Hugos, is a SFWA Grand Master, but he doesn't go on and on about it in every book. Most terrific authors let their work speak for itself, or at least have a sense of humor about listing their accolades. This guy comes off as such a prick (sorry, but he does!) every time that I want to throw the book across the room without reading it. I really almost just returned it unread because he seemed so unlikable. But I honestly put that aside before I started the book because I've liked several of his other books, including his WWW series, which is really quite good. And about a very empowered teenage girl, by the way. So what the heck happened???
The first thing the character does is, "let his eyes rove up and down her body." I get that he's making a point that everyone who can transfers (into perfect android bodies), but really? This sent my eyebrow up, it seemed inappropriate, but I shrugged, it was only the first page. If this was the way the author wanted to set his noir tone, with the rough PI in his office ogling his new client, it seemed very cliché, but OK, I thought. Maybe I was just being little sensitive to this because he mentioned Mike Resnick in his intro and he was at the center of the current SFWA controversy over sexism in that organization. And then on page 15 he was at it again. "What I wanted to see was under that beige suit..." Her husband is missing and she's your client and you're wondering what's under her suit? What a pig. Page 24, both waitresses were topless - why? What did being topless waitresses add to the story except lewdness? Page 102, the minor character's wife answers the door, has been transferred to a new body with big breasts, and wants to test out her, "It's like I'm a virgin again," body. They did acrobatics that put Earth-based p-orn stars to shame with the handles mounted on the ceiling over the bed. Then she disappears from the book after he listens in on a call from her hubby and goes off to intercept him. Because Lomax figured he shouldn't question him in the same place where he just banged his wife. Was this book written by a teenage boy? What was the point of the p-orno sex? Is this book being marketed to teenage boys?
And why would using the word gunsel in the way that Hammett used it in the Maltese Falcon, implying that he's gay, be a terrible insult? This author has no idea how consistently insulting he is in every way when it comes to sexuality.
Then, the absolutely most insulting thing of all, the writer in residence isn't a mousy guy, it's a gorgeous, statuesque woman with flawless chestnut skin, sexy brown eyes, and lovely breasts, of course. So she wasn't "remotely writerly". Seriously?!? Beautiful women aren't "writerly?" What do writers look like? Writers must look like unattractive men to be taken seriously? This is the center of every problem the SFWA controversy was calling attention to. Add this man to the list of men who at his core apparently doesn't think women are real writers. It's right here in black and white. Because he knows what writers look like.
One more example, near the end a woman comes running toward them and her large breasts were bouncing delightfully - how does that add to the moment of anxiety of them being at the mercy of being at gunpoint and not knowing if the people rushing toward them are friend or foe? Were her bouncing breasts really an important part of that scene description?
This is the most sexist writer I've ever encountered, it's like he was trying to illustrate every problem the recent SFWA blow-up was debating. Except he wasn't doing it ironically (and this came out well before the blow-up), he just is that deeply prejudiced and sexist and doesn't even realize it. I am not normally sensitive to these things. I don't go into books looking to see if the women have substantial roles independent from the men or if they're being sexualized, but when it hits me over the head like a ton of bricks over and over again, starting on page one and continuing throughout the book, it's just ridiculous. If the author can't describe any women in the book in any scene without telling me how big her breasts are or if her cleavage is showing them off nicely, there's a problem. That this book could be published by a major author in 2013 and not 1953 is just appalling.
OK, focusing more on the actual story, I really just didn't get the premise. He was trying to do this "noir" mystery in the future on Mars, but he didn't set up any reason for why this old fashioned tone makes sense. This is the future, full of advanced technology on another planet, so why does an old-fashioned guy using old lingo work? You have to have a premise other than implying that it's because the name of the town is New Klondike and this is like a new version of the gold rush. OK, fine, I get your analogy, but the people are still in the future. Was there a reason old slang became popular? He never gave a set-up. The whole tone just felt false, not charming to me. And the story was just haphazard and shallow. It wasn't at all what I expected from him. Usually he has cool ideas that I can grasp onto, really think about. He'll annoy me with his preaching about little things throughout other books, using his platform for little rants about his political positions (many of which I agree with), but only because he doesn't do a good job of working them into the story, they feel more like blogs or op-eds than natural parts of the story. But I admire him for doing it, for having strong points of view and for wanting to get them across. Where was all of that in this book? There wasn't any heart to the story there, must less additional rants or platforms. The idea of self when it comes to the transfers and androids was barely considered, very shallowly handled, and has been covered so extensively by other authors that he didn't add anything at all to the discussion. And that was the only concept that he intended to insert into the book. The sexism issue was clearly unintentional, though I think it's the true legacy of this book.
And what was with tipping his nonexistent hat so many times? Once, twice, three times is cute. Eight times by one-third of the way through the book is affected and obnoxious. Did anyone edit this book for him? Is his just "so powerful" according to his own bio that no one will call him out on anything? Clearly he didn't have any women beta test the book for him, but come on, did no one think that was annoying after the eighth time?
I know you'll think it's because I started out annoyed with him, but I was actually prepared to like the story, I've always liked his books before. I certainly didn't expect the sexism at all. I was impressed that he wrote such a great teenage girl character for his WWW series, I liked Flashforward and don't remember having any concerns about the balance between make and female characters. And not only that, but this book felt quite amateur, like he didn't put any effort into it. It felt like someone copying what Asimov did in Caves of Steel way back in 1954. Timothy Zahn did a great job in his Quadrail series without the gimmicky attempt to be old-fashioned, he makes me feel like the books are set far in the future while maintaining a cool classic noir mystery feel to the tales. Or if you want to read a really great mystery about people transferring minds and that actually got into the implications of it, read Richard Morgan's Altered Carbon. This just felt awkward and lacking depth. It felt like really shallow fanfic, to be honest. Clearly I'm not having a hard time being honest here. But it is hard. I don't give many bad reviews, I don't recall ever giving one this specifically harsh. It's not fun. This isn't one of those snarky reviews where the writer has fun writing and posting it. I'm disappointed. I kept reading the book because I was sure I must be missing something, that he would pull it together for me and that something wound happen that would make it all make more sense. But it didn't. He was very consistent this time out. Unfortunately, it was consistently bad.