i can't remember a book that i've been more frustrated with. i mean, i'm sure there have been some, i'm just not thinking of them. and i know that there are even books out there that i've liked LESS than this, but those really just instilled me with a vague "that-wasn't-very-good" feeling. this book.....ooooh, THIS book....i'm in a tizzy about.
it starts off slow. incredibly slow. nothing really even remotely scary or supernatural happens for roughly the first third of the book. at first, this was a complaint, but then when the ghostly goings-on actually started, i was almost okay with it. the time spent on the main character, jack stone, and the time spent fleshing him out, made the spooky stuff that much spookier. there are a couple of passages around this point that were downright chilling. i got excited about the book and curious as to where it was going to go.
then, cut to about 20 pages later, and the scary stuff is gone. completely gone. instead, we're treated to a lurid, frustrating tale of revenge that's being re-enacted on our protagonist, and, much like i'm sure was intended, the reader is forced to just about shout out loud with the frustration of the character making decisions that we know are bad for him.
the thing is, where i'm sure that the author intended one thing with that, my reaction was, and generally is, that i get so frustrated at such situations that i lose any sense of enjoyment. therein lies the first of a series of disappointments that ruin whatever goodwill the book had built-up with its (in hindsight, painfully brief) ghost-tale interludes.
and then comes the twist. oh, dear lord, the twist. the book even says, on the front cover, in a quote from the Times of London, that there is "a mind-boggling twist." however, never, in my wildest dreams, could i have imaginged the twist that author mark morris actually takes. it is only "mind-boggling" in the sense that you find your mind being boggled at the prospect of anyone actually thinking that it was a good idea. had it not been there, had the book gone in a different direction, it would have almost made the other missteps of the book forgivable. not entirely, but i don't think i'd be quite as angry at the book.
as it is, the end effectively killed the book for me. the only reason this is getting a 2 out of 5 is an extra point for those one or two scenes that worked, and because of how well they worked.
maybe, like has been done to certain movies online, someone should take the 30 or so good pages from this book and condense them into a short story that's actually good.