A sweet Christmas read. Imperfect, but cozy and romantic anyway.
The stody reveals itself as a (poorly) revised writing exercise that was later picked up for publication. Why do I claim this, you might ask ?? Well, because editing errors seem like little irksome details, and add up until they become glaring.
For example, the story begins the day after the Netherfield ball, when Bingley refuses to leave Hertfordshire and stays to pursue Jane. We are not told that anything else changes from the original story until that pivotal moment. But as the story unfolds, Darcy seems to see Wickham for the first time in years, and to be surprised about it, when in the original timeline Darcy met Wickham earlier after Jane´s stay at Netherfield (before the ball).
The storytelling relies on staple devices (clichés?) too many times for comfort, such as Lydia or someone else interrupting a first kiss between Lizzy and Darcy. The tease is used one too many times across the story. Irritating the reader is not quality writing or "delayed gratification", in my opinion, it´s just a tiresome trope used (and recommended to authors) in the early 2000s about "torturing characters" as much as possible to create tension [ eye roll ].
I did enjoy the story once I decided to overlook the little sins listed above. Not every story is perfect, but this one has potential for further editing and a bit of polishing to make it shine!