Does happiness come from the pursuit of pleasure or moral virtue? A vivid new translation of Cicero’s exploration of a timeless question
“Of course, we all want to be happy.” So wrote the Roman statesman, orator, and philosopher Marcus Tullius Cicero. He and his fellow Greek and Roman philosophers agreed that the secret to happiness—or what they called the “good life”—is pursuing the “greatest good.” The only problem is that they couldn’t agree on what the greatest good is. Cicero addressed this dilemma by composing a set of dialogues, On the Greatest Good and Evil (De finibus bonorum et malorum), in which he pitted advocates of different philosophical approaches to happiness against one another. Notably, these include the Epicureans (who believe that the greatest good is pleasure) and the Stoics (according to whom it is moral virtue). Rather than choosing sides, Cicero considers the pros and cons of the different philosophies, ultimately leaving it to his readers to make up their own minds. In How to Find Happiness, Katharina Volk offers a vivid new translation of selections from Cicero’s work, complete with an introduction. The result is a lively and engaging debate that invites each of us to discover our own path to happiness.
Born 3 January 106 BC, Arpinum, Italy Died 7 December 43 BC (aged 63), Formia, Italy
Marcus Tullius Cicero was a Roman philosopher, statesman, lawyer, political theorist, and Roman constitutionalist. Cicero is widely considered one of Rome's greatest orators and prose stylists.
Note: All editions should have Marcus Tullius Cicero as primary author. Editions with another name on the cover should have that name added as secondary author.
The selection takes out a bit more than I would like, but the original is still very good: books 1 and 3 are arguments for Epicureanism and Stoicism, 2 and 4 are rebuttals. Stoicism is, as I have elsewhere experienced it, frustratingly good. I was not expecting the same from Epicureanism. The solution, of course, is to recognize that [graciously infused] virtue is a means to glorifying and enjoying God, whose gifts are to be received and pursued as he gives them. But Cicero didn’t have that kind of revelation.
A few highlights: 1) Cicero exploiting Epicureanism’s inability to account for friendship. If everything is for pleasure, friends are loved for your sake, not theirs. 2) Cicero pointing out that “according to nature” has to include seeking the goods of the body and/or fortune. Being a rational animal doesn’t mean you aren’t an animal. 3) Cato arguing that the sapiens is in actuality what the many are foolishly seeking to be.
This is an excellent book. I liked it more than I expected, the arguments are very well laid-out and has a very important point in the end: it is best to strive for balance, not to fall into moral extreme. Some of the things written in this book deserve to be made into world-famous quotes. Highly recommended.