Duikers book provides solid explanations, but misses A LOOOT of events (usually ones like genocides or mass killings, rape etc that are „tabooed” for some reason… which i believe to be the triumph of a discourse of the majority unfortunately).
Its pretty detailed and provides text that makes the reader have a deeper understanding of the present, yet at the same time fails to go deeper into certain subjects.
I learned so much, but still im disappointed with a lack of certain mentions.
Ofc we cant expect a guy (who has a certain non objective viewpoint, as everybody) to create and write history with every single narrative included, full intersectionality and descriptions of how each event shapes memory and identity… but this book just lacked ones that i consider to be important in narrating history.
Also wth i mean why shouldn’t we expect that from historians!?!
Duiker, get your game up-this certainly was a good story tell, but not the most reliable one for many.