Somehow this book has become one of the standards for classical mechanics. Unfortunately, it is neither particularly detailed in its explanations nor well-written.
I'm parking this one because it doesn't cover what I need. I'm not rating it because it might be good or bad and I haven't read enough of it to judge. The fact that it assumes what I wanted to learn just means it isn't the book I need.
The first chapter presents a very austere but elegant exposition of the basic principles of Newtonian mechanics. It would probably not suit beginners but this isn't a book for beginners anyway. That's about all I can say.
This book still appears in my nightmares sometimes, and it always involves an impossible-to-read exam. If you love blocks sliding down increasingly complex ramps, this is the one for you.
"The" book that specializes on one of the 5 cornerstone topics that every physicist should learn. this isn't a "easy" book, but it is one of my favorites.
More analytical than geometrical but it still remains the gold standard for classical mechanics. The only improvement I would like is more succinctness.
This is my recommended book (and I am sure that many others will recommend it) for classical mechanics. It would help if you have already got some introduction to lagrangian and hamiltonian mechanics from some other book (I would recommend Classical Mechanics by Doughlas Gregory) but even if that is not the case, I will still say that this book is still one of the best and complete books out there to equip you with the basics and advanced topics of classical mechanics. One of the things that I like about this book is that it does cover the topic of classical field theory and does introduce the concept of lagrangian density. I do remember that I went to this book before I started to learn QFT as I didn't know about the concept of lagrangian density. This book explained that concept to me in a very understandable manner. Another remarkable feature of this text is that it does express special relativity in the formalism of lagrangians. This is a key insight that a student might need in high-level studies. For example, when someone starts to learn about relativistic strings, he/she does need to understand a lagrangian named Nambu Goto lagrangian. However, in order to understand that from where does the motivation to consider the area of a world sheet of the string as the lagrangian comes, one needs to understand the lagrangian of a relativistic point particle. This book does provide that understanding to it's reader. Last but not the least, this book also covers some of the advanced level topics in the application of classical mechanics i.e. the rigid body dynamics and Hamilton Jacobi theory. I won't recommend reading all of this book in one go. Instead, reading parts of this text according to the need will really help the reader to make the most out of this book.
Even though this is the standard mechanics book, its treatment is pretty average. Be careful when doing problems and check the website for corrections because there are a lot of typos. Also, there were a lot of changes between different printings of the same edition as some of the typos were corrected or problems modified, e.g. different potentials given for the same scattering problem. This makes it tough when the professor, grader, and your classmates all have different versions of the same problems.
This is a standard textbook used by Universities and Colleges all around the world for a course in Advanced Undergraduate Classical Mechanics as well as Graduate Courses in the subject. Frankly, it doesn't deserve this appreciation.
As a subject that is built on geometric intuition, this book does a fairly decent job at bringing up the notions, but fails to carry it through, thus making it a terse and boring book of differential equations with a little bit of physical context.
One good thing about this book though, is that despite it's appalingly boring nature, it isn't very difficult to follow and has some great insights to work with. Still, I believe it is subpar for the intended audience.
Best book about intermediate/advanced classical mechanics I've read my share of intermediate/advanced classical mechanics books, and this is definitely the best one. Some books are practically unreadable because they lean towards abstract/formal math lingo. Yes, contrary to other reviews, this book's language is much, MUCH more bearable than some others.(though I won't deny that there were parts that were hard to get through...). Easy Recommendation for bored undergrads.
Aptly called the Canonical Reference of Classical Mechanics. It is hard to find a book that covers topics in such depth or breadth as Goldstein. In some places, the author digresses a bit too much... so, not suitable for a quick read. Took me a while a to get through this, but, definitely worth it.
"For 30 years, this book has been the acknowledged standard in advanced classical mechanics courses." When this edition was published, it should have said, "For 50 years..." Now, it would properly say, "For 70 years..."
I never used it myself, but I graded a class that used it -- an intermediate class with delusions of grandeur.
Poorly Written. Certainly not a good idea for a self learner to read this. It's alright for quick reference to some topic or equation. The sequence of topics chosen by the author is aslo puzzling to me.
Not this edition. Reading the original edition. Smaller.
The book is mostly about transformations. There were many printing errors, but those are very forgivable. He does connect the classical mechanics to the the modern or the electromagnetic, but what was missing was collision theory.
I am not sure how useful transforming form one coordinate system to another will be. He even went through a couple of transformations of the simple harmonic oscillator, and stated that this was a more difficult way of doing it, but look, it has the same answer.
I haven't seen the newer edition, maybe it has more examples, but I doubt if it would be enough to change the book much. The size of the book, 370 reading pages was about right. I would have prefer less transformations and more mechanics.
his style of teaching isnt as for a 2nd year student... its disappointing when it takes ages for you to cover mere one page...:) especially in the beginning of it... I also think that the book lacks some diagrams.. some of the terms that are very impotant in developing your understanding further in the book, will just be introduced briefly and thats no good I believe... but maybe its my fault that am not that used to self study ..:) by the way... Its a good book I should say..
The ordering for the content inside this book is amazing H. Goldstain flows from one topic to another giving a very clear and deep explanation of the topics. The notation is clear and so is the explanation of the conceptual framework for classical mechanics and then builds from the ground up to our modern physics. The only thing I disliked about this book is that some problems are just crazy hard.
A reliable text on classical mechanics for upper undergraduates and beginning graduate students. Unlike Landau and Lifshitz, Goldstein did not spare words in explaining things, though he was at times overly formal. Not sure why the discussion on the opto-mechanical analogy and the links between classical and quantum mechanics was taken out, however.