There’s great information buried in here, but I want to grab the editors, shake them and shout, “Get your data in order!”
Why does table 3.5, “Training paces,” (pp.92-93) start with a GOAL MARATHON time in 5 minute increments (e.g. 3:20:00, 3:15:00, etc.) and translates it to PACES (in minutes and seconds per mile) for each workout, but the “Strength workouts” (pp.78-81) start with MARATHON GOAL times that are different and spaced haphazardly (e.g. 3:08:00, 3:12:00, 3:17:00, etc.)? 5 minute increments are Boston/major standards, so why not stick with it? Plus, since your goal pace remains the same at all 4 distances, why do we need 4 tables with the exact same information?
To make matters worse, the “Speed workouts” (pp. 68-74) are all based off your 5k or 10k GOAL TIME (total time, NOT PACE/minutes per mile—and not your MARATHON GOAL time at all). So since I don’t race short distances, I have to take my marathon goal time, find my suggested 5k pace, calculate the total time that race would take me, then find my speed workout time and THEN I still have to try to hit that pace in the workout, which I may not be able to do—how do you spike a 1’37” 400m? Oh, and don’t overrun it!
Then there’s the physiology chapter, that seeks to “take the physiology chapter that we see in all running books and turn it into something that runners can really understand and employ” (p. 21). Fine, it starts with fast- & slow-twitch muscle fibers, but then jumps to VO2max with a discussion of mitochondria. I am a personal trainer with a Ph.D. (in Communication) and this is pretty dense stuff. And then they say, VO2max is the gold standard, but we don’t use it, focusing merely on outcomes (pace). So why did we need all that?
Again, it’s a lot of good information, but hard to get to.