The purpose [of the Tyndale Bible] was "that men may know what they pray, also with words lest things (that are) special good and principal, being enwrapped in ignorance of the words, should not perfectly come to the mind and to the intelligence of men." Once understanding replaced ignorance, the battle was on for the minds as well as the hearts of Englishmen.
This book looked very useful when planning: "Let's create a 'History of Christianity in the British Isles,' but let's have different respected historians and theologians each take up a chapter." And so they divvy up the chronology and hand out chapter assignments. Then, for some very odd reason, the authors fail to convey any of the "history." They skip the details in a truly confusing manner, citing acts or events without any attempt at defining or describing them. It's as if they truly believe we should already be accomplished scholars on the "History of Christianity in the British Isles." Seriously. So each chapter is often one of the authors riffing on a personal point, making some obscure stand on some nebulous cause.
Rather, this book should have been titled "Ruminations on the History of Christianity in the British Isles." Then readers, like myself, would have expected that they never intended to provide any actual history, but are here simply to chat about history. I've seen this tendency in Rowan Williams before; he's no different here. But he's not alone--the tendency to rant and pontificate rather than explain or delineate is rampant.
There are much better books on this subject out there, trust me. Pick this up ONLY if your school deems this travesty a required text.
When Laud died, his pet tortoise lived on at Lambeth Palace for another 108 years, until it was killed accidentally by a gardener.
Milton's prose works were therefore kept in print primarily by eager heterodox figures who could claim him as an exemplar, men like John Toland and Richard Baron: this was more of a handicap than a help. Despite the efforts of such figures, English republicanism and English Arianism equally failed. Milton was doubly a loser.