The thesis of this book is that the Reformation didn't go far enough. Luther basically proposed that anyone who believed in Jesus was saved, regardless of baptism or any ecclesiastical affiliation, and thus the hierarchy in the church could only be a matter of organization and it all had to be for edification--for making people more like Jesus. So far, so good. Ogden thinks that by defining the church as the place where the word is rightly preached and the sacraments rightly administrated essentially defined the Church as the clergy. The two or three believers meeting and praying together are just as much "church" as any assembly of saints on Sunday.
I think the basic thesis is right.
This book was powerful in many ways, powerful in its denunciation of the current ecclesiastical setup and even powerful at moments in some of the solutions that it proposed. Still it has one flaw.
This book proves quite well that pastors used to be seen as kind of life caretakers: they oversaw people at major points in their life: birth, marriage, death. They had a very specific civic role, and that role is going away. Right now we are sliding into a dependency model in which the pastor functions as a superman, counselling and discipling everybody in the church. People think that attention from the pastor is special, but always mediocre when it comes from a fellow parishioner. No wonder we make pastors think they're holier than us and that so many get too big for their boots. They are superheroes and we expect them, and possibly the elders to do it all.
Ogden strikes me as a very wise man, and a very well read pastor, very much like Paul Miller. He writes in a highly accessible style that most people should be able to read, and the content really is on fire. Probably his best positive practical idea is that pastors should basically be equippers and trainers of leaders. This seems very Biblical (remember that the Apostles said they did not want to wait on tables, and counselling just isn't in the Bible). This still kind of keeps things top-down, but Ogden persuasively argues that there is a way to de-institutionalize the church and make organization organic. Perhaps we need to spend less time fighting over Presbyteries and engaging in work that saves souls. This for me is the biggest reason this book sells it's negative critique: Paul seems very concerned with telling people about Jesus and with telling people how to avoid sin, love their families, and do their work quietly. He seems less concerned with admin and denominations.
There is one big thing lacking though in his analysis, and it empties his proposals of some of their umpf for me: first, he is very positive about the way Evangelicalism is much more bottom-up grassroots movement. He labels his movement the New Reformation, but he doesn't ask the question, as far as I remember, about why Church is becoming this way. For my Roman Catholic grandparents, not attending Church was a mortal sin; now I feel like going to any ol' church is optional. Why has this happened? Well, it has to do with a lot of factors related to industrialism, technology, and increased mobility. The gist of the result is that civil society and the commons have broken down. Families are separated from their parents, and so inter-generational ties are weakened. People spend time on the couch watching TV or surfing the internet, rather than going out to town to have fun and spend time with people. This affects everything, and it means that the consumption model of church-shopping has hit Evangelicals hard, and so people are sometimes looking for "community" from churches in a way they haven't before.
Now, Ogden's proposed alternative is that pastors should train leaders and leaders should be part of small groups where they basically give people accountability and focused attention. The problem is I have experienced those things: they are called Bible studies, and believe me though they do a lot of good, they have a lot of problems. First, Bible studies and small groups working through devotional material often end up very pious and squelching any kind of mutual interest activities. The problem is that's how you make friendship. You can perhaps get around that by having meals together and having a chat about life, and that's wonderful, but the Bible study part doesn't really make people friends organically. Second, people are not going to bring their problems to the Bible studies. Indeed, they absolutely should not, since a lot of the stuff that we as humans need help with is private, sensitive, and not something a group should be working on. I'll be specific: if we're talking about a man who struggles with porn or a woman who struggles with loneliness or parents that struggle with childrearing and seniors who struggle with midlife or late-life crises are not going to get good help or discipleship in a group setting. People want to talk piously in these settings, so let's not pretend that people can make small groups Alcoholics Anyonymous.
Often Ogden raises very poignant problems; we really do need to focus less on the red tape and more on helping our neighbors in front of us. Church really does need to be organic and people out there have serious problems and megachurches are a very real problem. People are hurting, and we can do way more than we are currently doing. I know that I opened a can of worms and that I am way beyond Ogden. Since that's the case, I want to offer some of my thoughts on what constructive alternatives would be:
* Outreach: instead of looking to local churches to be your community, try to do things with nonbelievers. See what needs are out there. Are there people in trailer parks? Those people might be rather open to the gospel. Try going door to door. If there's activities in your life that involve unbelievers, pray for them and look for opportunities to invite them to church.
* Friendship: find out what you are interested in that is worthwhile (books, sports, or what have you) and seek out people who share that interest with you and prioritize your time with them.
* Counselling: we need to have more professionally trained Christian counselors, and if people are suffering from severe needs (sexual trauma, lack of self-control, relational disfunction, etc.), then they need to get help. More people than we think are in this category and you never know until they explode.
* Finally, a lot of people need life advice. Young men and women need help with vocations and relationships. Parents need encouragement and guidance about parenting. Seniors need to have people visiting them. Family is important here and it's probably the best remedy for all these problems, but as we all know Christians should be doing their part so the whole burden doesn't fall on the family; it really does take a village to raise a child. What we need are wise Christian mentors, and right now the field is ripe to harvest but the laborers are few.
Churches need to train people to be proactive in seeking out friendships, help, mentorship, and participating in society. People won't do this unless it's a social expectation, and the church can explicitly tell people to want these things. It's great to have congregational fellowship meals (they are a great way to make friends and to encourage each other). But fundamentally churches need to remind people about the gospel, about practical Christian living, about true spirituality, about the basics of the Biblical story, and the basic doctrines of the faith. Pastors should not be getting overly involved in the specifics of people's lives, though he should definitely observe and note false principles at work in our minds. Paul said that he wanted his children to be mature: the best thing about this book is the reminder that the Christian church needs to grow up. In a time where extended adolescence is more culturally normative then ever, Ogden's call to maturity is a breath of fresh air.