3-1/2 stars
Enjoyed this read for the most part. Loved having a female character who is strong that accepts that while she can protect herself, a man who moves in protection of her is thanked instead of whining about how she didn’t need that, she can take care of herself (which she truly can) and admonishing him for doing so. She was not offended he took protective action on her behalf.
Fools rush in, the thought I had on Basileia’s action during a particular scene. Then later the author failed this character with the same weak woman trope involving the man who absolutely betrayed her. Shame, that.
Parts that did not make sense, is him staying around so that he can ask the stone a question. Why would he need to do that while in her presence? He states he had to tie her up to make sure that she wouldn’t steal the stone back from him? The stone can only be used once, so once he uses it, it does not matter if she stole the stone back. He knew the stone could only be used once. She was unconscious for a period of time, and he’s just standing around? None of it made sense. Later he tried to justify that it would have fallen into the hands of these other two people‘s, and she said that she hated it when he made sense, that was a bunch of ridiculousness. It’s because of him that they became where they were. You cannot say that something made sense when it has no basis. And her continuing to allow him to call her “my illora” should not have been. He tells her he was not going to allow her to push him away like she does with everyone else, after he stole from her, took away the prize that she won and used another prize that she won against her, after DRUGGING her, fully betraying her. And she allows him to walk away after making that statement without reminding him. Convenience writing that they supposedly have to pretend to be intimate because there is a spy behind the walls watching, rather than being the queen she’s pretending to be and catching a spy out. Then makes all kinds of excuses for what was done, followed by essentially letting it go and pretty much getting back with him again with near zero passage of time. Full star loss for that. Why are they capitulating to someone else’s customs anyway? Just because where they are does it does not mean where she comes from it’s done that way, so it made no sense for her to not correct misconceptions or refuse things that are against her customs. Unless you’re one who is a convenience writer. At least them being further intimate to point of no return kept getting interrupted.
The room they are staying in has the ability to be spied on, so why are they openly and freely talking?
They are sent on a quest by their capture, a king who thinks Basilia is her friend family, who is the actual queen, Basilia agrees as she wants to protect said queen and free people that king has enslaved, which involves the self-proclaimed king of thieves going with. He showed her who he was and despite that she dismissed it and was dumb. He played her, AGAIN, and she allowed herself to be deceived AGAIN. Fool me once, shame on you, twice it’s shame on you. Total disappointment. HeHe did not sneak past her defenses, as she ridiculously thinks while admonishing herself for being such a fool, she totally opened the door.
Book one ends after he leaves her immediately after stealing from her AGAIN.
Second book would have to be read to see where things go from here. What I am not interested in, is her getting with him later, so I likely am not going to read further on the series. The book ends with her saying that she was going to hunt him down and kill him. Uh huh. I don’t agree for her to kill him, but definitely get back what he stole and beat him senseless, then that would be the end of her ever being with him. That is the ONLY appropriate outcome. Period.