3.5 /
what i liked
writing style: marisa franco is a powerful storyteller and distiller of psychological concepts. she does it all with charm, empathy, humor, and a singular conversational style.
pov: one of marisa’s greatest strengths is the manner in which she shares her perspectives. especially when it comes to naming finely tuned, meaningful nuance— where the simplest added detail or lens tilt brings about profound internal paradigm shifts. she did this again and again in ‘platonic’ and it’s present here as well.
her theory of worth: it’s likely that for many, this piece will be a life-changing paradigm shift. the insights that create the framework may seem obvious and deceptively simple. but bringing it all together into a coherent form that really hits and is validated in science is the magic. it’s the section i highlighted most.
why this wasn’t a 5 star for me like ‘platonic’ was
in a line: it didn’t seem to present brand new, groundbreaking science or a truly fresh reframing, so i felt a bit bait-and-switched by the subtitle.
her theory of worth: though i benefited from marisa’s articulations here, this wasn’t a new concept for me. i just happened to recently read a book from 2008 (almost 20 years old) called ‘loneliness: human nature and the need for social connection’ by john t. cacioppo. surprisingly, it presented loneliness not just as an emotional/situational state but a psychological and behavioral orientation. the framework was deeply reorienting for me. i bring it up because the descriptions and implications of that framework are ideologically very, very similar to marisa’s theory of worth. they feel significantly correlated to the point that for me as a layperson, they feel *almost* (but not completely) interchangeable. in the end, they hold indiscernible functional value for me. put another way, i already experienced the mic drop of a similar theory from john, so when marisa revealed hers, i was like, “oh. this is the new science?” i still highlighted many passages, though, because her distillations and articulations are always on point. cacioppo provides more nerdy and very fascinating detail for anyone curious. it was a surprisingly approachable report on his scientific studies.
the interventions in the second half: as someone who has been deep on a personal development journey for 15 years, i was familiar with most of them. they’ve all been around for awhile and again, are not new. relatedly, though the memory reconsolidation framework is interesting, it just felt like a new wrapper or reframing of existing concepts that have a similar functional value for me (i.e neuroplasticity). detailing the underlying mechanism behind something like EMDR that has been around for 40 years didn’t really do anything for me. for anyone who has who experienced it, the first thing you learn is that “you can change your brain’s relationship to your memories.” add to that that memory reconsolidation has been a topic in neuroscience for about 20 years already, the central intervention framework of the book doesn’t feel cutting-edge. but again, thanks to how she presents ideas, she did make me more curious about psychedelic interventions than i previously have been.
i promise i’m not trying to be a hater. i still love marisa. i just think the whole “new science” thing was a pretty big oversell for someone like me. but to be fair, probably like 3 people read cacioppo. so as i said, i think her theory of worth will be brand new and life changing for the more mainstream market she’ll hopefully reach. possibly same for the curated set of interventions she shared. EMDR is having a moment for lots of folks right now.
i received an advanced copy from netgalley in exchange for an honest review.