julie is one of the newer historical american girls. i believe she was introduced in 2007. the fact that she is historical is a source of some controversy, as her era in 1974. yeah. five years before i was born. it's weird. the idea of little girls in the year 2011 going out & buying a 70s-style doll with a long side braid & a tacky turtleneck & then outfitting her with a lava lamp, an awful rug shaped like a foot, & a basketball set straight out of the harlem globetrotters' locker room is pretty horrifying.
plus, her story isn't that great. while other historical characters are preparing for the revolutionary war or escaping from slavery, julie is bummed out because her parents are getting divorced. apparently julie's dad is a bit of a stick in the mud. he is portrayed as conservative, supportive of nixon, & an airline pilot. julie's mom is more influenced by the hippies: she wears her hair long, she is friends with a grizzled activist veteran in the neighborhood, & she runs a junk shop called gladrags. it's all a little embarrassing.
granted, in 1974, it was a bit unusual to have divorced parents--more unusual than it is today, anyway. but because divorce is so prevalent now, julie's story really pales in comparison to the woes of some of the other characters.
her B-plot is that she likes to play basketball, & her new school offers a basketball team for older kids (fourth, fifth, & sixth graders). julie decides to sign up, but when she stops by the coach's office to do so, he tells her to get lost because no girl is going to be playing on his team. all i could imagine during his scenes was biff from "back to the future". his name is even coach manley. i mean...really?
at first julie is cowed & disappointed, but then she remembers reading something in the newspaper (nine-year-olds read newspapers?) about a new piece of legislation that mandates that girls be allowed to play on boys' teams if their schools don't offer teams specifically for girls. she brings this to coach manley's attention, but he blows her off. again...really? i mean, maybe this is historically accurate but it's really difficult for me to imagine someone engaging in such a blatant act of illegal discrimination. rather than point this out or get an adult to do so, julie takes a page from the book of the activist veteran & writes up a petition. she gets 150 signatures from folks in the neighborhood that support julie's right to play on the boys' team. but when she presents it to the coach, he throws it away. so julie digs through the trash after school, recovers it, & presents it to the principal.
the principal, rather than saying something like, "it is crucial for us to be in compliance with federal law in order to maintain our funding, so yes, you can play on the team & the coach will be severely reprimanded if not fired for this act of egregious discrimination," instead says, "i like basketball too. & i like your moxie, kid. you've got a spot on the team!" it really seemed like he just said yes because he was impressed with julie's determination, as evidenced by the petition, & not because IT'S THE FUCKING LAW. WTF, book? this was weird. a person should not have to earn the right to have the law apply to them.