What do you think?
Rate this book


304 pages, Hardcover
First published October 13, 2015


In the Orient, the ways of initiation are mapped out—you know what stage you’re in, you find your guru, you submit to the guru, you do not criticize, you do what he tells you, and he leads you to your own experience. Not so in this European quest. In Parzival, you are to follow your own nature, your own inspiration; following someone else will lead you only to ruin. That is the sense of Parzival’s journey, and that is the sense you get, briefly, here, as the knights set out on the quest for the Holy Grail.The thing about myth is that it is timeless. It is always present in the here and the now: yet it all happened during some period when even time was not born. As Joe says
For in India, whether in its Hindu or its Buddhist teachings, the accent is again on the mystical side. It is not on the importance of historical events that may or may not have taken place, but on the requirement that something should happen, here and now, in one’s mind and will. And this brings me to what is a crucial, if not the crucial problem of this whole subject, namely, that of the radical distinction between the esoteric (mystical) and exoteric (historical) ways of reading mythological symbols: as references, on the one hand, to powers operative in the human heart as agents of transformation, and, on the other, to actual or imagined historical events.The Church, however, froze the myth in historical time – Christ became an actual person, dead and resurrected to atone for historical sins of the forefathers of the human race. Instead of searching for the Kingdom of the Father (which is “spread over the earth”, as the Gnostic Jesus said) within oneself, the spiritual journey becomes simply one of accepting Christ as the role of the redeemer. This enfeebles the whole quest – and it was partially in rebellion to this, that the tale of the Holy Grail was born (which, however, was later appropriated by Christianity).
The Waste Land, then, is the land of people living inauthentic lives, doing what they think they must do to live, not spontaneously in the affirmation of life, but dutifully, obediently, and even grudgingly, because that is the way people are living.This is the graveyard of the spirit – and the Grail here is the philosopher’s stone which will put it back to rights.
The idea of enchantment and disenchantment is that people at a certain time and place are forced to perceive the world in a way that is inadequate or improper to its character. This makes me think of the Gnostic aphorism in the Gospel according to Thomas in which Christ is asked when the Kingdom will come. And Christ says, “It will not come by expectation. It is here now. The Kingdom of the Father is spread over the earth and men do not see it.” Men do not see it because of an enchantment. In these legends the savior who is to disenchant the world is the equivalent of Christ, the Savior who opens men’s eyes.One other persistent motif in the knightly sagas is adulterous love – like that between Guinevere, Arthur’s queen and Lancelot, or that between Tristan and Isolde, his uncle Mark’s wife. This also signifies a rebellion: in an age where marriage was one of convenience and love was frowned upon, adultery was one way of asserting the individuals right. But this adulterous love was not eros (sexual attraction) or agape (platonic love) – rather it was amor, romantic love, where the loved object is loved for her essential nature.
In Oriental love, the woman becomes the vessel of a supernatural power of a transcendent energy, whereas in the European cult she is adored for herself, not as a symbol of anything.This is the essence of the romance of Tristan and Isolde, that of the doomed romantic lovers who however attain the godhead through the depth of their passion (this motif is analysed at length in Campbell’s The Masks of God, Volume 4: Creative Mythology).
...And the emphasis here was not on the generative powers of the earth, the heavens, and the waters beneath the earth, the female principle of nature’s spontaneity as symbolized in the Magna Mater, but on the war craft and shaping power of the male, as represented chiefly by a type of brilliant hero, very much like the Homeric hero, supported by the deities of an emphatically patriarchal, thunder-hurling pantheon. The characteristic myth concerns the conquest of a monster of some kind, usually of a serpentine, dragonlike form, who, in fact, in the earlier mythology had been the son-husband of Mother Earth (as, for instance, Typhon had been of Gaia). The dragon now is interpreted as the negative, binding, sterile aspect of the masculine principle, and the victory of the hero as the release of life (the gold, the maiden) from its hold. Typical in the Greek context were the deeds of Apollo against the great Python of the Delphic Oracle, of Perseus rescuing Andromeda from the sea beast, and of Theseus overcoming the Minotaur.This, probably, is where the knight rescuing the damsel from the dragon comes from.
