What do you think?
Rate this book
Abundance or Collapse: The Fork in the Road for AI, Robotics, and Civilization
ABUNDANCE OR The Fork in the Road for AI, Robotics, and Civilization
We're standing at a civilizational fork in the road. AI, robotics, and energy abundance are converging into a single force that will either deliver unprecedented prosperity or tear societies apart. There is no comfortable middle ground.
After 14 years tracking the companies at the center of this transformation, Farzad Mesbahi lays out a clear-eyed framework for understanding what's coming - and how to position yourself before the window closes.
What you'll
The Convergence: Why AI, robotics, and energy aren't three separate revolutions - they're one interconnected flywheel about to accelerate beyond anything we've seenThe Barbell Effect: Why the top 20% and bottom 20% will thrive while the middle 60% faces brutal disruption without interventionThe 2-5 Year Window: Why the next few years are critical for repositioning - and what happens to those who wait too longThe Investment Framework: How to identify companies positioned to benefit from (and create) this transformationThe Personal Roadmap: Concrete steps to prepare your career, finances, and mindset for the age of abundanceThis isn't optimistic futurism or doom-and-gloom prediction. It's a practical guide to navigating the biggest wealth transfer and societal transformation in human history.
The technology is coming regardless. The only question is whether you navigate consciously or get swept along unconsciously.
14 chapters covering technology, economics, geopolitics, and personal strategyTestable predictions with specific timelinesFramework glossary and position quick referencePrediction tracker for evaluating accuracy over time"Abundance or collapse. That's the choice. That's the fork in the road."
We're standing at a civilizational fork in the road. AI, robotics, and energy abundance are converging into a single force that will either deliver unprecedented prosperity or tear societies apart. There is no comfortable middle ground.
After 14 years tracking the companies at the center of this transformation, Farzad Mesbahi lays out a clear-eyed framework for understanding what's coming - and how to position yourself before the window closes.
What you'll
The Convergence: Why AI, robotics, and energy aren't three separate revolutions - they're one interconnected flywheel about to accelerate beyond anything we've seenThe Barbell Effect: Why the top 20% and bottom 20% will thrive while the middle 60% faces brutal disruption without interventionThe 2-5 Year Window: Why the next few years are critical for repositioning - and what happens to those who wait too longThe Investment Framework: How to identify companies positioned to benefit from (and create) this transformationThe Personal Roadmap: Concrete steps to prepare your career, finances, and mindset for the age of abundanceThis isn't optimistic futurism or doom-and-gloom prediction. It's a practical guide to navigating the biggest wealth transfer and societal transformation in human history.
The technology is coming regardless. The only question is whether you navigate consciously or get swept along unconsciously.
14 chapters covering technology, economics, geopolitics, and personal strategyTestable predictions with specific timelinesFramework glossary and position quick referencePrediction tracker for evaluating accuracy over time"Abundance or collapse. That's the choice. That's the fork in the road."
231 pages, Kindle Edition
Published February 14, 2026
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 14 of 14 reviews
May 4, 2026
The topic is important to know, the book is good but…
I’m going to be very straightforward. The author didn’t write it; the book was made 95% by AI, and I think it is important to highlight that you as a person need to move faster than expected in the AI era. I’ll save you money; the author mentions that AI is moving faster, that Elon and Tesla, xAI, and SpaceX are intended to lead in the AI era by their products, and that people that are not understanding or afraid of it will suffer. It talks about the barrel scene where 20% of the richest people will thrive, 60% of all people will suffer if they don’t understand AI, and the rest, 20%, the very poor will get their lives enhanced. Why am I doing this?Because I hate when it explains that the book was made by an AI agent when I was 70% of the book, and I had a suspicious clue that it was made with AI because a lot of phrases were repeating with no sense. So, at the moment when I read it, I was not able to request my refund; that’s fine if you want to make the book with AI but disclose it at the beginning and let me decide. I’d like to sue the name on the book not for the price of the book, but for the hours that I took to read it. Don’t get me wrong, the topic is hot and good, but there was a little connection over the chapters. See it as an episode of Law & Order that one ep from the next one is connected just for the actor (in this case, AI) but at the end, the story is totally disconnected as a whole.
I’m going to be very straightforward. The author didn’t write it; the book was made 95% by AI, and I think it is important to highlight that you as a person need to move faster than expected in the AI era. I’ll save you money; the author mentions that AI is moving faster, that Elon and Tesla, xAI, and SpaceX are intended to lead in the AI era by their products, and that people that are not understanding or afraid of it will suffer. It talks about the barrel scene where 20% of the richest people will thrive, 60% of all people will suffer if they don’t understand AI, and the rest, 20%, the very poor will get their lives enhanced. Why am I doing this?Because I hate when it explains that the book was made by an AI agent when I was 70% of the book, and I had a suspicious clue that it was made with AI because a lot of phrases were repeating with no sense. So, at the moment when I read it, I was not able to request my refund; that’s fine if you want to make the book with AI but disclose it at the beginning and let me decide. I’d like to sue the name on the book not for the price of the book, but for the hours that I took to read it. Don’t get me wrong, the topic is hot and good, but there was a little connection over the chapters. See it as an episode of Law & Order that one ep from the next one is connected just for the actor (in this case, AI) but at the end, the story is totally disconnected as a whole.
April 15, 2026
Reviewed in seconds by ChatGPT:
In Abundance or Collapse by Farzad Mesbahi, the term “flywheel” is used as a metaphor for reinforcing feedback loops—systems where progress builds on itself and accelerates over time. But your instinct is right: the analogy is a bit strained or “misplaced” if taken literally.
What a real flywheel does
A flywheel (in physics/engineering):
Stores rotational energy
Smooths out fluctuations (keeps motion steady)
Requires initial energy input, then maintains momentum
Doesn’t inherently accelerate itself—it just resists slowing down
So the key idea is inertia and stability, not exponential growth.
How Mesbahi uses “flywheel”
In the book, “flywheel” is used more like:
A self-reinforcing system
Where outputs feed back as inputs
Producing compounding or accelerating effects
Examples (paraphrased from his framing):
Better technology → lower costs → more adoption → more investment → even better technology
Infrastructure → scale → efficiency → more infrastructure
This is actually closer to a positive feedback loop or network effect, not a physical flywheel.
Why the analogy is off
Here’s the mismatch:
Real flywheel Mesbahi’s “flywheel”
Stores energy Generates growth
Stabilizes motion Accelerates change
Passive once spinning Actively self-amplifying
No inherent feedback loop Explicit feedback loop
A true flywheel doesn’t:
Multiply its own energy
Grow faster over time without additional input
Create feedback loops on its own
So calling exponential or compounding systems a “flywheel” is metaphorically loose.
Where the metaphor does kind of work
To be fair, there’s one overlap:
A flywheel is hard to start but powerful once moving
That part aligns with:
Early-stage effort → later-stage momentum
This is likely why the term became popular in business (notably via Jim Collins in Good to Great), where it describes gradual buildup leading to momentum.
Better metaphors (more precise)
What Mesbahi is describing would more accurately be:
Positive feedback loop
Compounding system
Network effects
Reinforcing cycle
These capture the self-amplifying nature that a real flywheel doesn’t inherently have.
Bottom line
The “flywheel” metaphor in Abundance or Collapse is:
Intuitively appealing (momentum, hard-to-stop systems)
But technically inaccurate if you think in physical terms
It conflates inertia (flywheel) with feedback-driven growth (compounding systems).
------------------------------------------------------
In his book "Abundance or Collapse", Farzad Mesbahi repeatedly makes the claim that solar energy is always available for orbiting satellites. What kind of orbits is he talking about?
He’s implicitly talking about orbits that avoid Earth’s shadow (the umbra) most or all of the time. In practice, that narrows to a few specific regimes:
1. Geostationary orbit (GEO) — the main one
Geostationary orbit
Altitude: ~35,786 km over the equator
Satellite appears fixed over one longitude
Sunlight:
In full sunlight ~99% of the year
Short eclipse seasons (~45 days around the March and September equinoxes)
During those seasons: up to ~70 minutes/day in shadow
👉 This is probably what Mesbahi has in mind: “almost always solar-powered,” with brief, predictable interruptions handled by batteries.
2. High Earth orbits (HEO) — including Molniya-type
Molniya orbit
Highly elliptical, long dwell time far from Earth
Sunlight:
Spend most time far from Earth → less time in shadow
Still not continuous sunlight
👉 These reduce eclipse time but don’t eliminate it.
3. Sun-synchronous orbit (SSO) (a special low Earth orbit)
Sun-synchronous orbit
Altitude: ~600–800 km
Passes over each location at the same local solar time
Sunlight:
Can be arranged for long daylight passes
But still enter Earth’s shadow every orbit (≈ every 90 minutes)
👉 So not “always available”—just regular and predictable.
4. Beyond Earth orbit (cislunar / Lagrange points)
Lagrange points
Example: Sun–Earth L1 or L2
Sunlight:
Essentially continuous sunlight (with careful positioning)
👉 This is the only regime where “always available” is literally true—but it’s not Earth orbit in the usual sense.
Bottom line
Strictly speaking: No Earth satellite gets perfectly continuous solar energy because of eclipses.
Practically:
GEO satellites come very close → “always available” is a reasonable simplification
Other Earth orbits do not meet that claim
Interpretation of Mesbahi’s claim
He’s using an engineering shorthand, not a literal statement:
“Always available” =
Continuous solar input most of the time
Short gaps bridged by batteries
This assumption is standard in space power system design, especially for GEO communications satellites.
If you want, I can quantify eclipse durations (GEO vs LEO) or show how big the battery needs to be to cover those gaps—that’s where the claim becomes more or less realistic.
In Abundance or Collapse by Farzad Mesbahi, the term “flywheel” is used as a metaphor for reinforcing feedback loops—systems where progress builds on itself and accelerates over time. But your instinct is right: the analogy is a bit strained or “misplaced” if taken literally.
What a real flywheel does
A flywheel (in physics/engineering):
Stores rotational energy
Smooths out fluctuations (keeps motion steady)
Requires initial energy input, then maintains momentum
Doesn’t inherently accelerate itself—it just resists slowing down
So the key idea is inertia and stability, not exponential growth.
How Mesbahi uses “flywheel”
In the book, “flywheel” is used more like:
A self-reinforcing system
Where outputs feed back as inputs
Producing compounding or accelerating effects
Examples (paraphrased from his framing):
Better technology → lower costs → more adoption → more investment → even better technology
Infrastructure → scale → efficiency → more infrastructure
This is actually closer to a positive feedback loop or network effect, not a physical flywheel.
Why the analogy is off
Here’s the mismatch:
Real flywheel Mesbahi’s “flywheel”
Stores energy Generates growth
Stabilizes motion Accelerates change
Passive once spinning Actively self-amplifying
No inherent feedback loop Explicit feedback loop
A true flywheel doesn’t:
Multiply its own energy
Grow faster over time without additional input
Create feedback loops on its own
So calling exponential or compounding systems a “flywheel” is metaphorically loose.
Where the metaphor does kind of work
To be fair, there’s one overlap:
A flywheel is hard to start but powerful once moving
That part aligns with:
Early-stage effort → later-stage momentum
This is likely why the term became popular in business (notably via Jim Collins in Good to Great), where it describes gradual buildup leading to momentum.
Better metaphors (more precise)
What Mesbahi is describing would more accurately be:
Positive feedback loop
Compounding system
Network effects
Reinforcing cycle
These capture the self-amplifying nature that a real flywheel doesn’t inherently have.
Bottom line
The “flywheel” metaphor in Abundance or Collapse is:
Intuitively appealing (momentum, hard-to-stop systems)
But technically inaccurate if you think in physical terms
It conflates inertia (flywheel) with feedback-driven growth (compounding systems).
------------------------------------------------------
In his book "Abundance or Collapse", Farzad Mesbahi repeatedly makes the claim that solar energy is always available for orbiting satellites. What kind of orbits is he talking about?
He’s implicitly talking about orbits that avoid Earth’s shadow (the umbra) most or all of the time. In practice, that narrows to a few specific regimes:
1. Geostationary orbit (GEO) — the main one
Geostationary orbit
Altitude: ~35,786 km over the equator
Satellite appears fixed over one longitude
Sunlight:
In full sunlight ~99% of the year
Short eclipse seasons (~45 days around the March and September equinoxes)
During those seasons: up to ~70 minutes/day in shadow
👉 This is probably what Mesbahi has in mind: “almost always solar-powered,” with brief, predictable interruptions handled by batteries.
2. High Earth orbits (HEO) — including Molniya-type
Molniya orbit
Highly elliptical, long dwell time far from Earth
Sunlight:
Spend most time far from Earth → less time in shadow
Still not continuous sunlight
👉 These reduce eclipse time but don’t eliminate it.
3. Sun-synchronous orbit (SSO) (a special low Earth orbit)
Sun-synchronous orbit
Altitude: ~600–800 km
Passes over each location at the same local solar time
Sunlight:
Can be arranged for long daylight passes
But still enter Earth’s shadow every orbit (≈ every 90 minutes)
👉 So not “always available”—just regular and predictable.
4. Beyond Earth orbit (cislunar / Lagrange points)
Lagrange points
Example: Sun–Earth L1 or L2
Sunlight:
Essentially continuous sunlight (with careful positioning)
👉 This is the only regime where “always available” is literally true—but it’s not Earth orbit in the usual sense.
Bottom line
Strictly speaking: No Earth satellite gets perfectly continuous solar energy because of eclipses.
Practically:
GEO satellites come very close → “always available” is a reasonable simplification
Other Earth orbits do not meet that claim
Interpretation of Mesbahi’s claim
He’s using an engineering shorthand, not a literal statement:
“Always available” =
Continuous solar input most of the time
Short gaps bridged by batteries
This assumption is standard in space power system design, especially for GEO communications satellites.
If you want, I can quantify eclipse durations (GEO vs LEO) or show how big the battery needs to be to cover those gaps—that’s where the claim becomes more or less realistic.
March 1, 2026
The author admits that 95% of this book was written by an AI agent, he provided the inspiration and was more of the editor. This is not to detract from the value of this effort or the validity and importance of the book. I found it insightful, thoughtful, impactful, balanced and comprehensive. His background as a technologist with Tesla and connection with E Musk (I won't hold that against him in this sphere), as well as his extensive youTube videos on the topics covered provides him with ample credibility and bona fides.
His views are very much in line with much of what I've been reading and watching over the years regarding the pace and impact of AI at this point in human/technological development. I created and taught a course entitled, The Cultural Impact of Information Technology, during the first decade of this century at a suburban Boston area college. A part of that course involved a discussion of Ray Kurzweil's take on the coming technological Singularity. Here we are some twenty years later discussing something very much in that vein. Only now, I'm convinced that we're about to experience the real thing.
Mr. Mesbahi (or his AI agent) does a great job in surveying not only the companies but, more importantly, the actual specific technologies that are gathering momentum in this headlong race to Full Self Driving vehicles, intelligent robotic systems, space-based data centers, but, most importantly, ultra sophisticated intelligent software that will profoundly impact the very social and economic fabric of the world of the working (and out-of-work) humanity.
One point of his tome involves a numerical triplet 20%-60%-20%. The top 20% are the people who understand and have 'skin in' the technology or who understand the framework of the new world order. The bottom 20% are those who today are at the bottom of the economic scale. The 60% are the majority of the work-a-day folks who put in 35+ hours of work every day, pay taxes and consume whatever they can afford. I like his proposal for a Guaranteed Annual Income for the lower 20% along with the benefits of healthcare and education. The big 'but' involves what happens with the 60% who are the heart and soul of the workforce. As their jobs are assumed by much cheaper and in many ways, more productive, AI agents. How we handle this historically essential group is something that must be deal with. This marks the difference between other technological revolutions and this one. Where previous revolutions replaced muscle, this one replaces minds.
Okay, what disturbed me? His antagonism toward regulations that don't suit the growth of AI. Farzad, is your home close to a windmill, a solar cell complex? Do you enjoy watching wide open spaces or mountain views? Environmental concerns are not to be tossed aside because the technology requires an extensive network of data farms. I do like the idea of solar powered units in orbit around the earth - take that path.
Taken in total this is a book that deserves attention and I recommend it to anyone trying to understand the real issues that will determine humanity's future as regards technology and society at large.
His views are very much in line with much of what I've been reading and watching over the years regarding the pace and impact of AI at this point in human/technological development. I created and taught a course entitled, The Cultural Impact of Information Technology, during the first decade of this century at a suburban Boston area college. A part of that course involved a discussion of Ray Kurzweil's take on the coming technological Singularity. Here we are some twenty years later discussing something very much in that vein. Only now, I'm convinced that we're about to experience the real thing.
Mr. Mesbahi (or his AI agent) does a great job in surveying not only the companies but, more importantly, the actual specific technologies that are gathering momentum in this headlong race to Full Self Driving vehicles, intelligent robotic systems, space-based data centers, but, most importantly, ultra sophisticated intelligent software that will profoundly impact the very social and economic fabric of the world of the working (and out-of-work) humanity.
One point of his tome involves a numerical triplet 20%-60%-20%. The top 20% are the people who understand and have 'skin in' the technology or who understand the framework of the new world order. The bottom 20% are those who today are at the bottom of the economic scale. The 60% are the majority of the work-a-day folks who put in 35+ hours of work every day, pay taxes and consume whatever they can afford. I like his proposal for a Guaranteed Annual Income for the lower 20% along with the benefits of healthcare and education. The big 'but' involves what happens with the 60% who are the heart and soul of the workforce. As their jobs are assumed by much cheaper and in many ways, more productive, AI agents. How we handle this historically essential group is something that must be deal with. This marks the difference between other technological revolutions and this one. Where previous revolutions replaced muscle, this one replaces minds.
Okay, what disturbed me? His antagonism toward regulations that don't suit the growth of AI. Farzad, is your home close to a windmill, a solar cell complex? Do you enjoy watching wide open spaces or mountain views? Environmental concerns are not to be tossed aside because the technology requires an extensive network of data farms. I do like the idea of solar powered units in orbit around the earth - take that path.
Taken in total this is a book that deserves attention and I recommend it to anyone trying to understand the real issues that will determine humanity's future as regards technology and society at large.
June 22, 2026
Seemingly, all books these days are about AI and every author feels compelled to opine on the potentials and dangers of AI. This book, which contains material on both sides of the AI debate, is rather unusual from the very beginning. On the cover, the author is identified as "Farzad." There's no copyright page, and no publisher is listed. On the back cover, the author is described as a "content creator and investor focused on the convergence of AI, robotics, and energy," providing no academic background. On LinkedIn, Mesbahi (@farzyness on X) introduces himself as Ex-Tesla Program Manager and full-time creator, with a 2009 bachelor's degree in mathematics from Penn State.
Also on the back cover, we read: "We're standing at a civilization fork in the road. The path we take over the next decade leads to one of two destinations--abundance or collapse. There is no comfortable middle ground. The book is about which path we take. And more importantly, how you can position yourself to thrive regardless of which way the wind blows." The blurb goes on to describe AI, robotics, and energy, not as three separate revolutions, but as pieces of an interconnected system, with each piece amplifying the other two in ways that we've not seen in human history.
The book's 12 chapters are structured in three parts.
Part I: What's Coming (the convergence, self-driving cars, Optimus, energy abundance)
Part II: The Stakes (the barbell, innovator's dilemma, US vs China, government's role, the transition)
Part III: What to Do (investment framework, data moat principle, your roadmap)
In the book's epilogue, which the author characterizes as "the honest summary of everything in the book," we are warned that our current enthusiasm for AI & robotics may prove to be wishful thinking. Nuclear energy was supposed to make energy too cheap to meter. The Internet was supposed to eliminate all middlemen (instead, it created Amazon & Google, the biggest middlemen in history). The author then goes on to assert that the age of abundance is coming. "The people who thrive in abundance will be the ones who have cultivated interests and purpose that do not depend on paychecks. The people who build because they want to, not because they have to. The people who find meaning in creation rather than consumption." [p. 207]
I always tell my students that they cannot write about science & technology without using figures, charts, and/or tables. Nothing with any technical or logical depth can be conveyed without illustrations or data. This book has none of these elements.
Also on the back cover, we read: "We're standing at a civilization fork in the road. The path we take over the next decade leads to one of two destinations--abundance or collapse. There is no comfortable middle ground. The book is about which path we take. And more importantly, how you can position yourself to thrive regardless of which way the wind blows." The blurb goes on to describe AI, robotics, and energy, not as three separate revolutions, but as pieces of an interconnected system, with each piece amplifying the other two in ways that we've not seen in human history.
The book's 12 chapters are structured in three parts.
Part I: What's Coming (the convergence, self-driving cars, Optimus, energy abundance)
Part II: The Stakes (the barbell, innovator's dilemma, US vs China, government's role, the transition)
Part III: What to Do (investment framework, data moat principle, your roadmap)
In the book's epilogue, which the author characterizes as "the honest summary of everything in the book," we are warned that our current enthusiasm for AI & robotics may prove to be wishful thinking. Nuclear energy was supposed to make energy too cheap to meter. The Internet was supposed to eliminate all middlemen (instead, it created Amazon & Google, the biggest middlemen in history). The author then goes on to assert that the age of abundance is coming. "The people who thrive in abundance will be the ones who have cultivated interests and purpose that do not depend on paychecks. The people who build because they want to, not because they have to. The people who find meaning in creation rather than consumption." [p. 207]
I always tell my students that they cannot write about science & technology without using figures, charts, and/or tables. Nothing with any technical or logical depth can be conveyed without illustrations or data. This book has none of these elements.
April 19, 2026
Abundance or Collapse by Farzad Mesbahi is a must-read wake-up call.
We're at a fork: AI, robotics, and energy convergence can bring massive abundance for humanity — or collapse. This book shows why we all need to actively participate in building the abundant future.
The barbell effect chapter hits hard for middle-class people and companies. Staying in the stagnant middle with old, inefficient routines is dangerous. By learning AI, upskilling, and leveling up efficiency, individuals and businesses can create more value, outpace competitors, deliver better goods and services, and move toward prosperity instead of being squeezed.
Whether you're a regular worker or running a company, this book gives the knowledge and roadmap to upgrade yourself and help push humanity toward abundance.
Read it now — the time to act is today.
We're at a fork: AI, robotics, and energy convergence can bring massive abundance for humanity — or collapse. This book shows why we all need to actively participate in building the abundant future.
The barbell effect chapter hits hard for middle-class people and companies. Staying in the stagnant middle with old, inefficient routines is dangerous. By learning AI, upskilling, and leveling up efficiency, individuals and businesses can create more value, outpace competitors, deliver better goods and services, and move toward prosperity instead of being squeezed.
Whether you're a regular worker or running a company, this book gives the knowledge and roadmap to upgrade yourself and help push humanity toward abundance.
Read it now — the time to act is today.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
June 14, 2026
Farzad explains the upcoming Convergence of AI, robotics and energy with clarity and advice on how to navigate one of the most transformational events that will happen in human history. He tries to be balanced in his predictions between collapse and abundance. He explains what disruptions will occur in society and politics because ultimately we have to beat China if America is to survive this.
Overall I liked the book, I think he is accurate that this convergence will and is already happening. However it’s a very simplified outlook. I’d like more thoughts on how our economy will change, how our communities will change in regard to the change in economics. Most of all I want to know how mineral resources and lack of, will affect the growth of this new technology.
Overall I liked the book, I think he is accurate that this convergence will and is already happening. However it’s a very simplified outlook. I’d like more thoughts on how our economy will change, how our communities will change in regard to the change in economics. Most of all I want to know how mineral resources and lack of, will affect the growth of this new technology.
March 7, 2026
Keep your hype filters on
Book deals overall with the massive effect AI will have on each part of the world’s population - the top 20% the middle 60% The outcome for each group will be different He discusses a different strategy for each group. And even though he’s a Tesla executive and stockholder I think much of what of what he says has good chance of happening. Well worth reading.
Book deals overall with the massive effect AI will have on each part of the world’s population - the top 20% the middle 60% The outcome for each group will be different He discusses a different strategy for each group. And even though he’s a Tesla executive and stockholder I think much of what of what he says has good chance of happening. Well worth reading.
May 13, 2026
A friend recommended this. I don’t think he had read it. I did. You don’t have to.
The subject deserves serious treatment. This is not that.
What you get instead is a collection of power frameworks - flywheels, barbell economy, convergence - deployed with the confidence of a Tesla bro who has been there since day one. Musk’s ventures appear less as evidence and more as scripture.
The writing doesn’t go anywhere. Chapters gesture at insight without arriving at one. Go for a walk instead.
The subject deserves serious treatment. This is not that.
What you get instead is a collection of power frameworks - flywheels, barbell economy, convergence - deployed with the confidence of a Tesla bro who has been there since day one. Musk’s ventures appear less as evidence and more as scripture.
The writing doesn’t go anywhere. Chapters gesture at insight without arriving at one. Go for a walk instead.
April 21, 2026
this foretells the near future
I plan to buy this and give it to the president of Asbury University. It is the must read book of the year. Massive changes are happening and will happen in our immediate future. You’ve got to read this.
I plan to buy this and give it to the president of Asbury University. It is the must read book of the year. Massive changes are happening and will happen in our immediate future. You’ve got to read this.
July 9, 2026
Terrific Big Picture Overview
Excellent discussion of the critical components underlying one of the greatest revolutions in technology and society. The final bit of the book felt light in substance but overall worth it just for the first two sections.
Excellent discussion of the critical components underlying one of the greatest revolutions in technology and society. The final bit of the book felt light in substance but overall worth it just for the first two sections.
February 24, 2026
Informative, prospective, and educative.
Great addition to the future world view that’s being developed for the times to come.
Gained vision and great advice to work on.
Great addition to the future world view that’s being developed for the times to come.
Gained vision and great advice to work on.
March 30, 2026
Wow! Everyone needs to read this…NOW!
May 2, 2026
excellent
Very informative
I highly recommend it
I am a professor in business and will suggest everyone I interact with read it
Very informative
I highly recommend it
I am a professor in business and will suggest everyone I interact with read it
June 7, 2026
In 5 or 10 years, I'll probably change my rating to one star. Likely, either the author will have been wrong, or it won't be worth reading anymore
Displaying 1 - 14 of 14 reviews