What do you think?
Rate this book
Dimensional Rendering Theory: An Ontological Framework for Reality and Consciousness
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 review
August 31, 2026
He had AI write this based on my work and didn't cite me and I can prove it. https://innomen.substack.com/p/the-re...
I'm lucky that he doesn't understand my work and broke it in the appropriation.
My amazon review:
Brandon S.
1.0 out of 5 stars Bad Prompt. An unattributed remix of Experiential Empiricism/Sourcery. (legal, but rude)
Reviewed in the United States on February 16, 2026
Format: Paperback
I was his first sale, because i was also his first subscriber. Very strange situation. We could have been friends. Still can be. All i want is attribution.
I would have helped him make this book better.
He's not breaking any rules. He's not trying to steal credit academically. He took my public scholarly idea, changed it enough that it's "original," and then printed it for sale and clicks. But in changing it, it no longer works as a theory. (He reintroduced unprovable externalism.)
But even then the book is just bad because it's extremely long winded/padded and 100% AI. Again, the AI itself is a not a problem. In the future we'll call this badly prompted. Garbage in garbage out.
For full documentation search "The Refactoring Pattern: When Frameworks Are Copied Without Understanding Their Foundations I wish he'd just attribute me. Innomen Feb 01, 2026."
See also _my_ book, "Sourcery: The Domain of Inquiry Underlying The Entirety of Meaning and The Axiomatic Foundation of Both Science and Philosophy"
Customer image
I'm lucky that he doesn't understand my work and broke it in the appropriation.
My amazon review:
Brandon S.
1.0 out of 5 stars Bad Prompt. An unattributed remix of Experiential Empiricism/Sourcery. (legal, but rude)
Reviewed in the United States on February 16, 2026
Format: Paperback
I was his first sale, because i was also his first subscriber. Very strange situation. We could have been friends. Still can be. All i want is attribution.
I would have helped him make this book better.
He's not breaking any rules. He's not trying to steal credit academically. He took my public scholarly idea, changed it enough that it's "original," and then printed it for sale and clicks. But in changing it, it no longer works as a theory. (He reintroduced unprovable externalism.)
But even then the book is just bad because it's extremely long winded/padded and 100% AI. Again, the AI itself is a not a problem. In the future we'll call this badly prompted. Garbage in garbage out.
For full documentation search "The Refactoring Pattern: When Frameworks Are Copied Without Understanding Their Foundations I wish he'd just attribute me. Innomen Feb 01, 2026."
See also _my_ book, "Sourcery: The Domain of Inquiry Underlying The Entirety of Meaning and The Axiomatic Foundation of Both Science and Philosophy"
Customer image
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 review