Phantom Flight 93

by Victor Thorn, Photos (Illustrator)

Could September 11's Flight 93 be the key to unraveling the entire 9-11 mystery? In Phantom Flight 93 - the first and only book to emerge from the 9-11 truth movement on this subject - you will discover how this event in Shanksville could very well be the smoking gun which exposes the government's falsehoods once and for all. Starting with physical evidence - especially a 10x12 foot crater in an abandoned strip mine - it becomes clear that a passenger jetliner could not have possibly crashed in Shanksville, Pennsylvania where federal officials said it did. Rather, the reality of that fateful morning is much more troublesome, and far more sinister. Also revealed in this book are a plethora of lies concerning the now-infamous cell phone calls purportedly made by individuals such as Todd Beamer, 9-11 passenger list oddities, corrupt officials who have been covering up this matter, and the many inexplicable anomalies surrounding the Sept. 11 attacks on America and the fate of Flight 93. For too long, Flight 93 has been overlooked by researchers and commentators in the alternative media. With the arrival of Phantom Flight 93, the public will finally see that they were deceived not only about the World Trade Center towers and the Pentagon, but also about an unproven crash in southwest PA which became the stuff of legend, but was ultimately nothing more than a poorly executed hoax.

189 pages, Paperback

First published May 1, 2007

About the author

Pseudonym of Scott Robert Makufka, Operator of the website WingTV and writer on conspiracies. Thorn was a Holocaust-denier and blamed Israel and the Jews for the death of Kennedy and 9-11. In his three books against the Clintons he cites proof of Bill Clinton's drug-running and attributes four deaths of her critics to Hillary Clinton. Thorn also published the writings of other anti-Semites and conspiracy theorists.

Thorn died of a gunshot wound, which some sources say was not suicide but the work of either Hillary Clinton or Mossad.

Reviews

[Steven H · Rating 1 out of 5]

A RATHER MEAN-SPIRITED ARGUMENT THAT THE GOVERNMENT SHOT DOWN FLIGHT 93

"Victor Thorn" is a pen name for the author of numerous "conspiracy"-related (and sometimes anti-Zionist, and holocaust denialist) books, such as 'New World Order Assassins,' 'The New World Order Exposed,' etc. He and Lisa Guiliani also worked together on 'Illusion (New World Order Trilogy, Book Two)' and 'Dirty Secrets: Crime, Conspiracy and Cover-up During the 20th Century.'

They discount the phone call from Todd Beamer on Flight 93 to a GTE supervisor: "She doesn't know what Beamer sounds like... So somebody who said he was Todd Beamer talked to Jefferson, who related what was said. Again, you have a disconnect between the wife of the deceased hearing her own husband's voice." (Pg. 17) Later, they refer to such calls as "nothing but spook calls made from inside the Puzzle Palace [NSA]. That's all it was---part of the legend that was created that day." (Pg. 87)

They state, "It's like the 'Jersey Girls' that are supposedly doing everything humanly possible to find the truth, yet at every turn they turn their back on any kind of information that would open the door to expose a cover-up, so there's something fishy going on... they're all turning their backs and saying, we're not really all that interested in the truth." (Pg. 54-55)

They suggest that (by their own calculations, not the "official" calculations, it should be noted) only 22%, 22%, 28% and 13% of the passengers and crew of the four 9/11 planes are found in the privately-owned (NOT the SSA's own database!) Social Security Death Index, and conclude, "Remember human greed? Of the 266 people that we were told died on those jets, only 11 relatives applied for compensation. Can you believe that not a single relative from Flight 93 applied for compensation? I can't." (Pg. 109-110)

Their conclusion is, "Flight 93, or what was purported to be Flight 93, was shot down... the people in control ... didn't want to admit that they had shot it down. So they had three minutes, in which time they sent in another plane and created an 'event' in Shanksville as a diversionary tactic... to keep people away from the real crash site, which was New Baltimore." (Pg. 65-66)

There is some interesting material in the book, but also a lot of rather undocumented speculation; and, despite the book's dedication to the victims of 9/11, this book would certainly prove highly offensive to many families of such victims. Caveat emptor...

[Alex Sarmiento · Rating 1 out of 5]

One of the worst books I’ve had the misfortune of reading. Only thing worse than a poorly thought out conspiracy book is a poorly written and poorly thought out conspiracy book. Another peeve is the arrogance some of these conspiracy theorists have…as if their version of events is so completely obvious that we have to be complete morons to not buy into it he “theory”

I can only shake my head and think “no”

[Mark]

Livia Rokach is not associated with Phantom Flight 93.
Based on an Amazon listing, it was published in 2007 by Victor Thorn and Lisa Guliani.

Rokach died in 1984 in Rome, allegedly a suicide.

[Lisa Chapman · Rating 4 out of 5]

good for thought

I may not agree with it but it is intriguing and well researched worth a quick read if only to understand the truth movement

[John separovich · Rating 5 out of 5]

Sensational and intriguing information

How could so many facts be ignored by so many. Why do we really not want to know the real truth of what happened?

[Scott Larson · Rating 3 out of 5]

Thought provoking with problems

First, this book is quite interesting and presents many of the problems surrounding the government's version of what happened to flight 93. However, the book is poorly written and formatted making it a difficult to read. While the subject material is compelling, the lack of professional editing and formatting casts a shadow of amateurism upon the entire work. I have no doubt as to the validity of the research, it's that the entire work becomes suspect when presented so poorly.

[David Moncoeur · Rating 5 out of 5]

Better than I thought it was going to be, interesting to feel the different responses of the people in the recorded discussion.