Great read! Came into it skeptical because all sin is sin, but chapter 1 spoke what I was thinking in regards to classifying sins in the categories of venial and mortal, ““This ranking of sin obscured the fact that all sin, small or great, is rebellion. At its essence, sin is the declaration that something other than God is more to be desired than God. Thus, all sin is deadly because it is worthy of infinite judgment. Secondly, the mortal/venial distinction severed the relationship between root and fruit, disconnecting patterns of sinful behavior from the core idolatries of the heart. Thus, Aquinas’s distinction weakened the diagnostic usefulness of the seven-sin taxonomy. Nevertheless, his distinction between venial and mortal sin has remained the doctrine of the Roman church to the present time.” Then shortly after, ““contemporary Protestants probably make more mention of the seven deadly sins than many of their forebears.9 This kind of categorization still threatens to encourage the idea that some sins are more or less serious, and may cause some to hold lightly or even dismiss certain other sins. As a diagnostic, though, the system holds great value, creating questions and categories that help us see and defeat our darkest inclinations.”
Reading the rest of the book acknowledging these as diagnostics instead of THE 7 sins (that if I’m avoiding them I’m doing just fine), but as a scope into how sin does kill our joy when we chose our way over God’s way! Short read but super applicable if you happen to be a sinner… (spoiler alert: you are…)