I'm a skeptic of nearly all in the leadership genre of books, so was not expecting much from this one. It delivered to my expectations. Mr. Lowney reviews the 45-year history of the Jesuits and tries to draw leadership lessons from that history--especially its first generation.
It has some redeeming qualities and the best of those is the very interesting biographical sketches of many of the early Jesuits. These he wrote well, with real admiration that easily transfers to the reader. Also, his reference to the Jesuits as a "company" is off-putting (and added to my skepticism), but the author ably defends his choice of that wording.
Against those positives is the usual weaknesses of the genre--an author goes into a book with an idea of what traits make up a good leader, then chooses the set of historical / current / reviewed company / or other data to show that, sure enough, what he deems to be good leadership is good leadership. Having read broadly in the genre, it's all quite tiring to me.
This effort gave Lowney a significant opportunity to explore how followers of Jesus become leaders and the link between God's sovereignty and those who emerge to lead His church. He completely whiffed on that opportunity. There is no link whatsoever in the book to God, to Jesus whom the Jesuits serve or really to their faith at all, just the same old tired formulas for creating and growing a massive and successful organization.
As I read through the genre, I've developed the habit of comparing what I'm reading to those very significant people who emerged as leaders in God's kingdom: Abraham who was just hanging around in Ur; Moses who was an 80 year-old outcast; Gideon the reluctant; the timid Saul; David, the youngest of seven who spent his formative years with the flock; Jeremiah, hired by God to be a failure; Amos, the shepherd from Tekoa ("what am I doing here?); all twelve of the apostles, etc., etc. These, who would play very significant roles in the advancement of God's kingdom, never read any books on leadership, went to conferences, or had internships or mentoring by the great and good. Probably none of them would have been anywhere in the top 50% of candidates.
There is, it seems to me, a very significant gap between how we think about developing leaders and how God chooses them; there is a similar gap between the characteristics we look for in leaders and the characteristics God seeks. I'd love to see someone, with no agenda or pre-ordained conclusions, take a deep look from Scripture at how God chooses leaders. We have a lot to learn. Probably the first lesson is stop listening to what the world admires in leaders.