I can’t mince words here: this was one of the worst books I’ve ever read. I felt genuinely furious and disgusted reading this careless, unfinished, nonsensical, offensive mess.
Quick premise because I cannot be bothered to write a full blurb: In an alternate universe where the Cold War never ended, four insufferable teenage criminals get enlisted at a military academy, where their unique abilities get them wrapped up in a top-secret CIA mission.
I had to check over and over again that this is supposed to be YA and not Adult. I mean there are two on-page sexual assault scenes (one of which is a main character being held down while her shirt is torn off and another main character gets hard while watching, and the other is a teacher forcibly kissing a student). There’s also an open-door sex scene, a mostly-closed-door oral sex scene, a graphic scene where a character finds a family member who has committed suicide, and a flashback of a character watching someone violently kill an animal. Did Reid get confused and think she was still writing Innamorata?
It’s not like I’m opposed to explicit content being included in YA either. When I was a teenager, I read the Throne of Glass series and even ACOTAR back when it was still shelved as YA and didn’t bat an eye. If anything, providing teenagers a safe outlet for their curiosity is a good thing. But this isn’t how you do it, and it made me so uncomfortable to think this is supposed to be for a young audience. The characters’ vapid obsession with their bodies and their friends’ bodies, the predatory teacher/student relationships, the literal sexual assault scenes. It’s this mess of bizarre sexualization and graphic content just included for shock value, and it’s all completely unnecessary. Given that Reid purposely does not include trigger warnings for her books, the fact this is supposed to be YA is even more appalling.
Even beyond the inappropriate content, the actual meat and potatoes of the story isn’t good either. If you need ANY level of consistency or feasibility in a story, you will not find it here. This reads like a moodboard of completely random ideas smashed together and none of it has any substance. The things that should actually be interesting about the story like the military espionage, the war simulations and student rankings, the Pokemon-ripoff video game tournament - all of it happens off page. We never actually see any of it happen, there are only brief descriptions saying who won and then the social maneuvering surrounding it, but not once are the events shown on page. Later, when the setting changes and the main characters are on their CIA mission, there’s still no action, they just solve Shakespeare-themed riddles as “ingenuity tests.” I wish I was joking. The book is all telling and no showing. The reader is just supposed to watch people talk about the thing without ever seeing the thing.
So what about the genre? Surely there’s something interesting there. Well, the dystopian elements are truly just set dressing. I won't claim to be particularly educated in poli sci, but even I know Reid is just stringing together word salad about political theory and whatnot, and none of it made any sense. So to me, someone relatively uneducated in political science, it sounds like gibberish, and I see people who are educated hating how inaccurate and nonsensical it is, so it just seems like a lose-lose all-around. The furthest any kind of commentary goes is “capitalism bad,” “rich people bad,” and “nationalism bad,” and it never attempts to do anything thought-provoking with those ideas. It’s the big 2026, you think your readers don’t already know this? Every day I log into social media, I see a new horrifying headline that shows me these same concepts; a quick scroll has more substance than anything this book has to offer.
Not to mention the inclusions that are so on-the-nose they’re just cringe-worthy. The “conservative conspiracy theorist webshow host” who’s named Jamie Fox and just goes by “Fox”? Or the character who is undoubtedly supposed to be Elon Musk, specifically mentioning he’s the CEO of a tech company that’s getting too involved with the government, that he’s South African, and that he has a bunch of children with different women to “further a superior bloodline.” And all he does is show up, flirt with one of the teenage protagonists, then disappear. Why? I have no idea! The plot makes no sense!!
And what really riled me is how this book so desperately tries to be progressive while still shoving every character into the most stereotyped box possible. I’ve already seen plenty of reviews talking about how bizarre it is that the book states dozens of times that Klaudia is NOT pretty but does have big boobs, and is constantly sexualized by other characters. What irked me was how another main character, Giselle, was treated. Of course the Appalachian character is a child pageant star whose family lives in a trailer and whose boyfriend gave her a promise ring he bought at Walmart. Of course all of her classmates refer to her as “redneck Barbie” and she is never defended by any other character. Of course the other main characters mentally judge her accent. And even Giselle herself perpetuates this, in a scene where she wants to write a letter home to her mom to tell about the academy and to let her know she’s all right, then decides not to because “Her mother waitressed at a biker bar on the interstate. None of these words were in her vocabulary.” Maybe it’s just me, but I found every attempt to be forward-thinking laughable when Reid is also making every character a caricature full of the worst assumptions you can have about a type of person.
I can’t deny that Reid is a skilled writer on a technical level, but I also can’t help but question her storytelling abilities and what she chooses to include in her books. While I am grateful A Study in Drowning helped me get back into reading, I think I’m officially done reading anything from Ava Reid. Genuinely, I felt so disgusted after finishing this that I put the books I owned by her up for sale. I just can’t reconcile the books I once adored with the author who wrote a book like this. Normally for ARCs I suggest who I think the book will work for, but I can’t in good conscience recommend this book. Maybe if you want a hate-read, this will work for you.
Thank you to NetGalley and HarperCollins Children’s Books for providing me with this ARC in exchange for an honest review.