1. I was unaware up until this book that our intrepid CSIs had anything approaching "rank." Mr. Preisler, I am unamused with your fact-checking.
2. What is this mysterious flood that keeps being referenced? I keep feeling that there should have been some sort of episode lead-in, like they do on the show - you know, rain, thunder, lightning, the body being washed down the mountain...Instead, zip, nada, nothing. I even googled to see if Las Vegas had been flooded any time in the past two years or so, beyond the typical flash floods (which are normal, Mr. New Yorker).
3. I am rather put out by the fact that the plot spent so much time with a unnamed, perhaps-crazy man and his woman (women?) that left this reader struggling to untangle the pronouns (and author's motivation). I was especially peeved since this directorial choice seemed to have been made at the expense of a main character - Nick Stokes, who appeared for exactly 5 pages out of 289. I've concluded in the past that tie-in novels are perhaps not the best way to get more of your favorite characters, unless they are Truly Main Characters, but five pages? Cripes.
4. Oh, lol, Sara calling people 'whippersnappers.' Haha, *headdesk*
5. Wow, another case hinging partly on a suspect's homosexuality. Color me unimpressed.
6. Very odd, sudden change in narrative style on page 270 - Mr. Preisler, here are a few verbs. No need to thank me.