This book was recommended to me by Word on Fire’s Brandon Vogt, whom I very much admire, but unfortunately I found it seriously shallow.
It’s a book that would work well if it was directed only at the clergy. But the fact that it’s written for everyone makes it ridiculously bad.
Summary: “All of you have to give away ALL your possessions tomorrow to the poor, except for the 2 or 3 things you need to avoid being “seriously destitute and dirty”, and everything should be held as common goods, for everybody.”
Cool! Ok. Not in the least what the fathers of the Church have been saying for 2,000 years, when reflecting upon the gospel, but let’s pretend he’s right and let’s follow along.
Also: let’s ignore the many canonized saints who were, in fact, very wealthy during their lives, until their death, like St. Thomas More, St. Katharine Drexel, St. Louis IX, etc.
But let’s pretend for a moment.
Ok! Given all away. Done.
Now that we have all done this, let’s take a look around: what economic system do we have in the country at this point? A sort of communism, right? Should we remind Fr. Dubay how spectacularly well communism works as a form of government?
His only small excuse is that he hadn’t seen some of the consequences of those regimes, as he wrote this book in 1981.
Honestly, I looked frantically for at least one sentence in the book where the author stated that you should not always give away all the possessions you have that you don’t very strictly need, but I couldn’t find it.
Here’s what will happen if you follow the author’s advice:
1). you will cause serious harm to yourself, by not being able to cover your healthcare and education costs, especially in the US.
2). you will cause serious harm to your family, by not being able to cover healthcare and education costs for your children, especially in the US.
3). you will cause serious damage to the economy, and you probably won’t have a paid job anymore. Of course, this is applicable on an exponential level, when thousands or millions of people lose their marbles after reading this book and pretend they are S. Francis. Because:
a) in this crazy utopia described by Fr. Dubay, no one would be able to HIRE you anymore, because they would lack the capital to invest in a business. They would have given that capital away, to the poor. Sorry. No capital, no investment. No investment, no entrepreneurship, no business. No business, no job for you. Have fun working for the KGB equivalent or picking blueberries in a commune.
b). the consumer economy, the same one that has lifted millions of people from extreme poverty (See the UN’s Millennium Goals) needs the consumer. A responsible, charitable and judicious consumer is what the gospel is asking for. Jesus is asking us to become saints, but is he also asking us all to become priests? I don’t think that would make sense. The difference in the economic management of your life is immense, it’s drastic.
4). Every adult person in America would need to work for USPS. At some point, the poor wouldn’t be poor anymore, and they would need to send back to you the things that you gave them when they were poor and that they don’t ‘strictly’ need. But now you have stuff that you don’t need again, so you need to ship them back again to them. And so on, ad infinitum.
When addressed by the rich young man, Jesus tells him to give away all his possessions only after he sees the man struggling within his soul and with his own spiritual journey: all that he was doing was not enough for him, and he was too attached to his wealth. He wanted to be perfect. Ok. But every deep biblical scholar that I’ve read does not interpret that new testament passage as a blanket call to radical poverty for all humanity. That would mean stripping away from humanity immense God’s gifts: art (paintings, architecture, cinema), entrepreneurship and global cooperation that have been made possible throughout history only by capital. Everyone poor = no capital = none of those things are possible. No industrial revolution, either. Think about the consequences of that.
Also, every serious biblical scholar I’ve read, including Brandon’s boss, Bishop Barron, is careful to interpret “poverty” in the gospel as lack of money, yes, but also as a broader concept than lack of money. It could be lack of privileges. It could be lack of good looks. It’s something earthly, material, that you have less than others. That makes a lot of sense. And that’s why the more articulated beatitude is found in Matthew (“blessed are the poor in spirit”), which is often interpreted close to something like humility, while it comes through dangerously simplified in Luke (“blessed are the poor”).
But wait, there is more bad: a tone of needless aggression towards lay people runs throughout the book, and I wonder if we should be seeing a very prideful man behind the sanctimonious paragraphs. Yes, there can be pride in giving things away, too. And a certain sadistic pleasure in writing with the tone of a zealous policeman.
Most likely, though, Fr. Dubay’s fault was not pride. It was simply ignorance. Heart in the right place.
Rest in peace.
What stays with me is that same spark that prompted me to ask for suggestions for books that talk about poverty. I know there is always more that I can do to be more open and generous, and I will keep working on it.